The Effect Of Vertical Releasing Incision On Implant Procedures
Vertikal
Examination Of The Effect Of Vertical Releasing Incision On Implant Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Split-Mouth Study
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluated the clinical and biochemical aspects of flap design in dental implant applications regarding implantation success and patient comfort. In this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial, a vertical releasing incision was made at the distal end of the crestal incision on the test side, and the control side received a crestal incision alone. Sixty-eight implants were placed in 17 patients. Peri-implant groove fluid was collected on postsurgical days 3, 7, 30, and 90; OPG and RANKL levels were assessed to determine bone formation and resorption around the implants. Cortisol levels were assessed in peri-implant groove fluid at postsurgical days 3, 7, and 14. Visual analog scale (VAS), and swelling measurements were taken postoperatively. Panoramic and periapical X-rays were obtained immediately post-surgery and at 3 months. No significant marginal bone loss difference was observed between the test and control sides at 3 months. The RANKL/OPG ratio, cortisol levels, VAS scores, and swelling scores were higher in the test vs. control sides. Overall, while the use of a vertical incision has advantages, such as increasing the visual field of the surgeon and improving the ease of the operation, this approach should be used only when necessary, given the disadvantages of increased bone resorption mediators in the peri-implant tissue and reduced postoperative patient comfort.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedMarch 21, 2024
March 1, 2024
2.2 years
March 12, 2024
March 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bone loss
The degree of marginal bone loss (MBL) at the end of the 3rd month was determined and compared to the initial value. The following data were used to determine MBL: radiological marginal bone loss (RMBL), radiological implant length (RDİL), and real implant length (RİL).
İnitial to 3rt mounth
Other Outcomes (3)
OPG/RANKL
days 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90
visual analog scale (VAS)
days 3, 7, and 14
cortisol levels
days 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90
Study Arms (2)
test side
EXPERIMENTALA mid-crestal incision was made on the test side with a no. 12 scalpel and a sulcular incision was made around the first natural tooth and a 5-mm vertical incision was made disto-obliquely to the distal crestal incision
control side
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnly a mid-crestal incision was made on the control side with a no. 12 scalpel and a sulcular incision was made around the first natural tooth
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with bilateral tooth deficiency in the lower jaw posterior region who received 2 dental implants on the right and left sides were recruited from the Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Periodontology between December 2018 and January 2020
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded if they had any systemic disease, demonstrated bone structure unsuitable for a 3.7 × 10 mm dental implant, were pregnant, had previously received radiotherapy or chemotherapy, had a tooth extracted from the implant area within 6 months, had active periodontal disease, required antibiotic prophylaxis, had inadequate keratinized gingiva, or demonstrated a tissue phenotype \>2 mm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry
Melikgazi, Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Duygu Kılıç, Dr
Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2024
First Posted
March 21, 2024
Study Start
August 5, 2018
Primary Completion
October 2, 2020
Study Completion
October 2, 2020
Last Updated
March 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share