Reinsertion Achilles Tendon VS Zadek Osteotomy in Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
42
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to Compare functional outcome and the recovery time of reinsertion of achilles tendon VS zadek osteotomy in insertional achilles tendinopathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
February 1, 2025
Same day
March 7, 2024
February 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the time needed to return to normal daily activities (functional outcome) assessed by foot and ankle outcome score.
foot and ankle outcome score is a tool to measure the symptoms, stiffness, pain, function, daily living, sports and recreational activities of foot and ankle problems. It is based on 100 questions and ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms or limitations.
up to1 year post baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain assessed by the visual analogue scale.
up to1 year post baseline
Rate of complications
up to1 year post baseline
Study Arms (2)
Reinsertion achilles tendon
ACTIVE COMPARATORReinsertion Achilles tendon by 2-4 anchors.
Zadek osteotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORA calcaneal osteotomy was then performed, two Kirschner wires, were then inserted from the posterior aspect of the calcaneus, over which cannulated screws were used for fixation of the osteotomy.
Interventions
Prone position, tourniquet over the thigh, direct midline incision, 2.0 cm proximal the insertion of the Achilles tendon up to 4.0 cm prolonged distal to the insertion is recommended. This is followed by a totally disinsertion of TA. At least a debridement of inflammatory or necrotic tissue as well as the removal of bony tissue is performed. tendon is re-inserted by 2-4 anchors.
lateral position, under spinal anesthesia, tourniquet over the thigh, oblique lateral heel incision starting just anterior to the Achilles tendon, at a 45 angle to the long axis of the calcaneus posterior to the course of the sural nerve. A calcaneal osteotomy was then performed, two Kirschner wires, were then inserted from the posterior aspect of the calcaneus, over which cannulated screws were used for fixation of the osteotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range 18 - 65
- Insertional Achilles tendinopathy without steroid injection, infection, tendon rupture and ankle fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years, \> 65
- General medical contraindications to surgical interventions
- Calcaneal Fracture, subtalar fusion
- infection.
- Pathological tendon rupture
- History of steroid injection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Scott A, Huisman E, Khan K. Conservative treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy. CMAJ. 2011 Jul 12;183(10):1159-65. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101680. Epub 2011 Jun 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 21670110BACKGROUNDRees JD, Maffulli N, Cook J. Management of tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):1855-67. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324283. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
PMID: 19188560BACKGROUNDKleinman M, Gross AE. Achilles tendon rupture following steroid injection. Report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Dec;65(9):1345-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 6197416BACKGROUNDScholten PE, van Dijk CN. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006 Jun;11(2):439-46, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2006.02.004.
PMID: 16798522BACKGROUNDMcAlister JE, Hyer CF. Safety of achilles detachment and reattachment using a standard midline approach to insertional enthesophytes. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;54(2):214-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
PMID: 25619811BACKGROUNDRigby RB, Cottom JM, Vora A. Early weightbearing using Achilles suture bridge technique for insertional Achilles tendinosis: a review of 43 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):575-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.11.004. Epub 2013 May 11.
PMID: 23669005BACKGROUNDI. Zadek An operation for the cure of achillobursitis Am J Surg, 43 (1939), pp. 542-546
BACKGROUNDSanaei-Zadeh H, Emamhadi M, Farajidana H, Zamani N, Amirfarhangi A. Electrocardiographic manifestations in acute methanol poisoning cannot predict mortality. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2013 Jun;64(2):79-85. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2285.
PMID: 23819935BACKGROUNDGeorgiannos D, Kitridis D, Bisbinas I. Dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy for the treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A technical tip to optimize its results and reduce complications. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Apr;24(2):115-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
PMID: 29409230BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wael Y El-adly, professor
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amr AF Mohammed, lecturer
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident in Orthopedic department at Assiut university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2024
First Posted
March 21, 2024
Study Start
February 16, 2025
Primary Completion
February 16, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share