Acupuncture for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare acupuncture plus a prescribed home exercise program versus a prescribed home exercise program alone to determine which has better outcomes at improving pain relief and physical function in adult patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The investigators want to compare a combination of two standard of care treatments (acupuncture plus a prescribed home exercise program) versus a single standard of care treatment (a prescribed home exercise program) to determine which has better outcomes with improving pain relief and physical function in patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a significant improvement in pain and functional outcomes, both acutely and over time, in the acupuncture plus a prescribed home exercise program group versus the group performing a prescribed home exercise program alone. The investigators will measure Achilles pain relief and physical function immediately prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the initial treatment at day 1, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A). After 3 months, patients with continuing pain in the non-acupuncture arm will be given the option to crossover to the acupuncture arm of the study for an additional 12 weeks of treatment with the subject's concurrence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 16, 2021
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
2.1 years
November 14, 2018
September 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain over time as measured by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A)
Change in pain over time as measured by the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A). The VISA-A is measured as a score out of 100, where a lower score indicates a worse outcome.
the first visit, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Acupuncture and Home Exercise
EXPERIMENTALAcupuncture and home exercise.
Home Exercise Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe prescribed home exercise program alone.
Interventions
Acupuncture (needles will be placed at BL 60, BL 61, KI 3, KI 4 with needles directed into the Achilles tendon. Needles inserted until a firm catch of the needle entering the tendon was appreciated. Energy (a small electrical current) is placed from KI 3(-) KI 4(+) and BL 61 (-) BL 60(+) at 30 Hz for 15min) plus the prescribed home exercise program
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female DoD beneficiaries, age 18 years or older
- diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy OR patients meeting criteria of pain 2cm or less from the insertion to the Achilles tendon on the calcaneus.
- Patients must have had pain for greater than 8 weeks and a VISA-A score less than 60.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Active cellulitis over the area of needle insertion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
96th Medical Group
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, 32542, United States
Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center
Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 89191, United States
Related Publications (9)
Li HY, Hua YH. Achilles Tendinopathy: Current Concepts about the Basic Science and Clinical Treatments. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6492597. doi: 10.1155/2016/6492597. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 27885357BACKGROUNDRobinson JM, Cook JL, Purdam C, Visentini PJ, Ross J, Maffulli N, Taunton JE, Khan KM; Victorian Institute Of Sport Tendon Study Group. The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Oct;35(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.335.
PMID: 11579069BACKGROUNDIversen JV, Bartels EM, Langberg H. The victorian institute of sports assessment - achilles questionnaire (visa-a) - a reliable tool for measuring achilles tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;7(1):76-84.
PMID: 22319681BACKGROUNDChildress MA, Beutler A. Management of chronic tendon injuries. Am Fam Physician. 2013 Apr 1;87(7):486-90.
PMID: 23547590BACKGROUNDRowe V, Hemmings S, Barton C, Malliaras P, Maffulli N, Morrissey D. Conservative management of midportion Achilles tendinopathy: a mixed methods study, integrating systematic review and clinical reasoning. Sports Med. 2012 Nov 1;42(11):941-67. doi: 10.1007/BF03262305.
PMID: 23006143BACKGROUNDArnold MJ, Moody AL. Common Running Injuries: Evaluation and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Apr 15;97(8):510-516.
PMID: 29671490BACKGROUNDHawks MK. Successful Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy with Electroacupuncture: Two Cases. Med Acupunct. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):163-165. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1232.
PMID: 28736593BACKGROUNDBreivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000 Mar;16(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005.
PMID: 10741815BACKGROUNDLudington E, Dexter F. Statistical analysis of total labor pain using the visual analog scale and application to studies of analgesic effectiveness during childbirth. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):723-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00045. No abstract available.
PMID: 9728862BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Hawks, MD
Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2018
First Posted
November 20, 2018
Study Start
December 12, 2018
Primary Completion
January 4, 2021
Study Completion
March 16, 2021
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share