Working Memory Functioning in Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia
MEMTRAV-COG
Efficacy of Working Memory Maintenance Mechanisms in Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia
1 other identifier
observational
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to investigate potential cognitive mechanisms contributing to working memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. The investigators consider a new hypothesis suggesting that difficulties in mobilizing maintenance strategies of information could explain this working memory deficit. More specifically, the investigators assume that patient groups will have difficulties in employing both refreshing and elaborative strategies during a working memory task (i.e., complex span task), as compared to a control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 20, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.4 years
February 5, 2024
March 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Memory performance in the Working memory task
Percentage of correct immediate recall, computed with strict serial recall criterion (item identity + correct position) and computed with item recall criterion (item identity only).
15 minutes
Processing performance in the Working memory task
Percentage of correct response in the spatial part of working memory task
15 minutes
Reaction time
Reaction time for each distractor (in ms) in the spatial part of working memory task
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
15 minutes
Digit span forward WAIS IV (digit number)
5 minutes
Digit span forward WAIS IV (standard note)
5 minutes
Digit span backward WAIS IV (digit number)
5 minutes
Digit span backward WAIS IV (standard note)
5 minutes
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Alzheimer disease
Alzheimer's disease is define on the basis of the medical diagnostic. As part of routine care, they undergo a standardized clinical neuropsychological assessment that evaluates several cognitive functions. For the study and during the day of medical consultations, each patient will perform a working memory task, lasting approximately 30 minutes. If the patient is accompanied by a family member, the investigators ask the latter to complete a questionnaire on patient's daily executive functioning (French version of the Behavior rating inventory of executive function \[BRIEF-A\]).
Vascular dementia
Vascular dementia is define on the basis of the medical diagnostic. As part of routine care, they undergo a standardized clinical neuropsychological assessment that evaluates several cognitive functions. For the study and during the day of medical consultations, each patient will perform a working memory task, lasting approximately 30 minutes. If the patient is accompanied by a family member, the investigators ask the latter to complete a questionnaire on patient's daily executive functioning (French version of the Behavior rating inventory of executive function \[BRIEF-A\]).
Mixed dementia
Mixed dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia) is define on the basis of the medical diagnostic. As part of routine care, they undergo a standardized clinical neuropsychological assessment that evaluates several cognitive functions . For the study and during the day of medical consultations, each patient will perform a working memory task, lasting approximately 30 minutes. If the patient is accompanied by a family member, the investigators ask the latter to complete a questionnaire on patient's daily executive functioning (French version of the Behavior rating inventory of executive function \[BRIEF-A\]).
Control group
Control group includes healthy older adults (without cognitive impairment). As patient group, control group will perform the working memory task. However, control group does not undergo the clinical neuropsychological assessment.
Interventions
The intervention consists in a computerized working memory task. This task follows the design of a complex span task, involving alternation between memorization and processing steps. For each trial, participants have to memorize French words. These words are sequentially displayed on the screen. Between each word, participants perform a processing task consisting in a spatial location task: They have to determine if a shape is at the top or at the bottom of the screen. After each processing episode, participants have a free time (i.e., available time to maintain information in WM). At the end of each trial, participants perform an orally immediate recall. This experimental task involves several conditions in order to manipulate the opportunities for the spontaneous use of refreshing and elaborative strategies.
As part of routine care, participants in the patient group undergo a standardized clinical neuropsychological assessment that evaluates several cognitive functions. The investigators hypothesize correlations between working memory performance during the experimental task and the results of neuropsychological tests. Thus, the investigators consider the results to several French versions of neuropsychological tests: * MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) * "Digit Span Backward" subtest (WAIS-IV) * Stroop Test * Trail Making Test (TMT) * Rappel Libre - Rappel Indicé à 16 items or GERIA-12 * Category fluences * Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and ADL .
Participants in the control group undergo 2 tests clinical that evaluate cognitive functioning. The investigators consider the results to French versions of these neuropsychological tests: * MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination; ) * "Digit Span Backward" subtest (WAIS-IV)
Eligibility Criteria
The population of this study will consist of patients performing a neuropsychological assessment at Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital. These patients consult because of cognitive disorders. The patients are dividied into these three subgroups according to their medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia (diagnostic criteria : Dubois et al. (2021) for Alzheimer's disease; VASCOG diagnostic criteria : Sachdev et al., 2015 for vascular dementia; and diagnostic criteria : DSM-V (APA, 2013) for mixed dementia due to Alzheimer and vascular etiology). The population of this study will also include healthy participants (carers/visitors of patients at the Gerontology centre or volunteers at Gerontology centre).
You may qualify if:
- For patient and control groups: Adults ≥ 65 years of age
- For patient and control groups: Native French speaker
- For patient and control groups: Vision for easy reading
- For patient and control groups: Hearing for easy instruction understanding
- For patient and control groups: Back span ≥ 3 during the "Digit Span Backward" subtest (WAIS-IV)
- For patient and control groups: Formulation of the non-opposition to participate in this study
- For patient group only: Consultation in Grenoble University Hospital (Centre de Gérontologie Sud - Gerontology center) for clinical neuropsychological assessment due to suspected cognitive impairment
- For patient group only: Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia)
- For patient group only: Have undergone a neuropsychological assessment at the day clinic, less than 6 months old.
- For patient group only: Have obtained a medical opinion stating that there is no contraindication to participate in this study and no concurrent pathology that could impair the patient's cognitive abilities.
- For patient group only: Absence of praxis and language disorders thath might prevent the carrying out of the experimental task.
- For patient group only: MMSE score between 18 and 25 included
- For control group only: External visitor/carer of a patient/resident of Grenoble University Hospital or volunteers at Grenoble University Hospital.
- For control group only: MMSE score ≥ 26
You may not qualify if:
- For patient and control groups: People under guardianship or deprived of their freedom
- For patient and control groups: Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorders
- For patient and control groups: Suspicion of pathologies related to alcohol dependence
- For patient and control groups: No French social security coverage
- For patient and control groups: Refusal to voluntarily participate in this study
- For patient and control groups: People covered by articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code
- For patient group only: Suspicion of another neurodegenerative disease, such as fronto-temporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body disease.
- For patient group only: Clinical neuropsychological assessment did not reveal any cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoblelead
- University Grenoble Alpscollaborator
- Université Savoie Mont Blanccollaborator
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Francecollaborator
- Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognitioncollaborator
Related Publications (27)
Bartsch LM, Singmann H, Oberauer K. The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation. Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):796-808. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0805-9.
PMID: 29557069BACKGROUNDBelleville S, Chertkow H, Gauthier S. Working memory and control of attention in persons with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2007 Jul;21(4):458-69. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.4.458.
PMID: 17605579BACKGROUNDCamos V, Johnson M, Loaiza V, Portrat S, Souza A, Vergauwe E. What is attentional refreshing in working memory? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):19-32. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13616. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
PMID: 29542133BACKGROUNDConway AR, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Hambrick DZ, Wilhelm O, Engle RW. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03196772.
PMID: 16523997BACKGROUNDInasaridze K, Foley JA, Logie RH, Sala SD. Dual task impairments in vascular dementia. Behav Neurol. 2010;22(1-2):45-52. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2009-0252.
PMID: 20543458BACKGROUNDZheng C, Zhang RS, Wan T, Zhao JS. Topological Alterations of Working Memory Impairment in Aged Patients With Vascular Dementia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Oct 4;13:741445. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.741445. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34675799BACKGROUNDBaddeley AD, Baddeley HA, Bucks RS, Wilcock GK. Attentional control in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1492-508. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1492.
PMID: 11459742BACKGROUNDBelleville S, Peretz I, Malenfant D. Examination of the working memory components in normal aging and in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Mar;34(3):195-207. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00097-6.
PMID: 8868277BACKGROUNDFoley JA, Cocchini G, Logie RH, Della Sala S. No dual-task practice effect in Alzheimer's disease. Memory. 2015;23(4):518-28. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.908922. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
PMID: 24787541BACKGROUNDFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1202204BACKGROUNDGagnon LG, Belleville S. Working memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: contribution of forgetting and predictive value of complex span tasks. Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):226-36. doi: 10.1037/a0020919.
PMID: 21090897BACKGROUNDJahn H. Memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013 Dec;15(4):445-54. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.4/hjahn.
PMID: 24459411BACKGROUNDJellinger KA, Attems J. Prevalence and pathology of vascular dementia in the oldest-old. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(4):1283-93. doi: 10.3233/jad-2010-100603.
PMID: 21504129BACKGROUNDKATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW, JACKSON BA, JAFFE MW. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. No abstract available.
PMID: 14044222BACKGROUNDKorczyn AD, Vakhapova V, Grinberg LT. Vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov 15;322(1-2):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 May 8.
PMID: 22575403BACKGROUNDLawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
PMID: 5349366BACKGROUNDMcGuinness B, Barrett SL, Craig D, Lawson J, Passmore AP. Executive functioning in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;25(6):562-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2375.
PMID: 19810010BACKGROUNDO'Brien JT, Thomas A. Vascular dementia. Lancet. 2015 Oct 24;386(10004):1698-706. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00463-8.
PMID: 26595643BACKGROUNDRaoux N, Le Goff M, Auriacombe S, Dartigues JF, Amieva H. [Semantic and letter fluency tasks: normative data in an elderly population of 70 years old and over from the PAQUID cohort]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2010 Jun-Jul;166(6-7):594-605. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Mar 16. French.
PMID: 20236672BACKGROUNDTombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar;19(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8.
PMID: 15010086BACKGROUNDVandenberghe M, Michiels J, Vanderaspoilden V, Claes T, Fery P. [Creation and normalisation of a verbal episodic memory task in elderly adults: "GERIA-12"]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2015 Dec;171(12):853-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Nov 10. French.
PMID: 26563664BACKGROUNDVergauwe E, Ricker TJ, Langerock N, Cowan N. What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):779-794. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000625. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
PMID: 30024250BACKGROUNDRoy, A., Fournet, N., Le Gall, D., Roulin, J. L. BRIEF. Inventaire d'évaluation comportementale des fonctions exécutive - Adaptation française. Hogrèfe France Editions (2014).
BACKGROUNDLogie, R., Camos, V., & Cowan, N. Working memory: State of the science. Oxford University Press. (2020).
BACKGROUNDGrober E., & Buschke H. . Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Developmental Neuropsychology,(1987) 5, 13-36.
BACKGROUNDCraik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology (1975). General, 104, 268-294.
BACKGROUNDBayard, S., Erkes, J., & Moroni, C. (2009). Test du Stroop Victoria-Adaptation Francophone. CPCN-LR, Gignac.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Benoit Lemaire
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition
- STUDY CHAIR
Sophie Portrat
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share