The Effect of Case-based Teaching on Midwifery Undergraduate Students
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Case-based teaching will be applied to second year midwifery undergraduate students. The intervention group (case-based teaching implementation group) and the control group each consist of 35 students.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2024
CompletedJuly 9, 2024
July 1, 2024
1 month
March 14, 2024
July 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Determination of Critical Thinking Motivation
The Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS) consists of 19 items and is rated on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6. It has two main sub-dimensions as "expectancy" and "value". Consisting of 4 items, the main sub-dimension "expectation" aims to measure individuals' perceptions of the possibility of accomplishing the tasks. The second main sub-dimension, "value", has 15 items. The main sub-dimension "Value" consists of "achievement" (4 items), "usefulness" (4 items), "intrinsic value/interest value" (4 items) and "compensation" (3 items) The first sub-dimension of the main sub-dimension "Value", "achievement", measures the importance of doing a task well; "intrinsic value" measures the pleasure derived from doing a task; "usefulness" refers to how a task fits with one's future plans; "cost" refers to the constraint that engaging in an activity places on other activities, the evaluation of how much effort is required to complete the activity, and the emotional cost of doing so.
At the first interview, the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determination of Critical Thinking Motivation
The Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS) consists of 19 items and is rated on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6. It has two main sub-dimensions as "expectancy" and "value". Consisting of 4 items, the main sub-dimension "expectation" aims to measure individuals' perceptions of the possibility of accomplishing the tasks. The second main sub-dimension, "value", has 15 items. The main sub-dimension "Value" consists of "achievement" (4 items), "usefulness" (4 items), "intrinsic value/interest value" (4 items) and "compensation" (3 items) The first sub-dimension of the main sub-dimension "Value", "achievement", measures the importance of doing a task well; "intrinsic value" measures the pleasure derived from doing a task; "usefulness" refers to how a task fits with one's future plans; "cost" refers to the constraint that engaging in an activity places on other activities, the evaluation of how much effort is required to complete the activity, and the emotional cost of doing so.
Four weeks after the first interview, the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Determining the level of Academic Motivation
At the first interview, the Academic motivation scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determining the level of Academic Motivation
Four weeks after the first interview, the Academic motivation scale is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Determining the status of access to information
At the first interview, the information assessment form was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determining the status of access to information
Four weeks after the first interview, the information assessment form is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Evaluation of satisfaction with the training methods used and the effect of training methods on perceptions of competence during clinical practice
At the first interview, the Visual Comparison Scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group (Case-based instruction group)
EXPERIMENTALCase-based teaching will be provided to second-year students who take the risky pregnancy and care course for the first time, who are included in the case-based teaching group by randomization method.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group is the group in which no intervention was made.
Interventions
Case-based instruction will be applied to the students in the intervention group. "Student Information Form", "Critical Thinking Motivation Scale", "Academic Motivation Scale" and "Knowledge Assessment Form" will be . All students will receive classical in-class theoretical education about such as hemorrhages, hyperemesis gravidarum, oligohydramnios and urinary system diseases. In the intervention group, after the theoretical teaching of each subject within the scope of the Risky Pregnancy and Care course, cases prepared on the basis of the subject taught to the students will be applied. "Student Information Form (13th and 14th questions)", "Critical Thinking Motivation Scale", "Academic Motivation Scale", "Knowledge Assessment Form" and "Visual Comparison Scale" will be applied to all students as post-test data after case-based teaching of four topics.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Who agreed to participate in the research,
- nd year midwifery student taking the "Risky Pregnancy and Care" course,
- No clinical experience in hemorrhages, hyperemesis gravidarum, oligohydramnios and urinary system diseases (Health Vocational High School Graduate etc.).
You may not qualify if:
- Incomplete completion of data collection forms,
- Not participating in all case-based teaching phases,
- Who want to leave the study,
- Working as a midwife in any health institution,
- Who have taken this course before.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Kahramanmaraş, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Gholami M, Changaee F, Karami K, Shahsavaripour Z, Veiskaramian A, Birjandi M. Effects of multiepisode case-based learning (CBL) on problem-solving ability and learning motivation of nursing students in an emergency care course. J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
PMID: 34016321BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Esra KARATAŞ OKYAY, PhD
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2024
Study Start
March 19, 2024
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Last Updated
July 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
we don't share individual participant data with other researchers