Sponsor study identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Study Start
March 19, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Case-based teaching will be applied to second year midwifery undergraduate students. The intervention group (case-based teaching implementation group) and the control group each consist of 35 students.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 14, 2024
Actual (reported)March 19, 2024
Actual (reported)March 20, 2024
Actual (reported)April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Determination of Critical Thinking Motivation
The Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS) consists of 19 items and is rated on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6. It has two main sub-dimensions as "expectancy" and "value". Consisting of 4 items, the main sub-dimension "expectation" aims to measure individuals' perceptions of the possibility of accomplishing the tasks. The second main sub-dimension, "value", has 15 items. The main sub-dimension "Value" consists of "achievement" (4 items), "usefulness" (4 items), "intrinsic value/interest value" (4 items) and "compensation" (3 items) The first sub-dimension of the main sub-dimension "Value", "achievement", measures the importance of doing a task well; "intrinsic value" measures the pleasure derived from doing a task; "usefulness" refers to how a task fits with one's future plans; "cost" refers to the constraint that engaging in an activity places on other activities, the evaluation of how much effort is required to complete the activity, and the emotional cost of doing so.
At the first interview, the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determination of Critical Thinking Motivation
The Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS) consists of 19 items and is rated on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6. It has two main sub-dimensions as "expectancy" and "value". Consisting of 4 items, the main sub-dimension "expectation" aims to measure individuals' perceptions of the possibility of accomplishing the tasks. The second main sub-dimension, "value", has 15 items. The main sub-dimension "Value" consists of "achievement" (4 items), "usefulness" (4 items), "intrinsic value/interest value" (4 items) and "compensation" (3 items) The first sub-dimension of the main sub-dimension "Value", "achievement", measures the importance of doing a task well; "intrinsic value" measures the pleasure derived from doing a task; "usefulness" refers to how a task fits with one's future plans; "cost" refers to the constraint that engaging in an activity places on other activities, the evaluation of how much effort is required to complete the activity, and the emotional cost of doing so.
Determining the level of Academic Motivation
At the first interview, the Academic motivation scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determining the level of Academic Motivation
Four weeks after the first interview, the Academic motivation scale is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Determining the status of access to information
At the first interview, the information assessment form was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Determining the status of access to information
Four weeks after the first interview, the information assessment form is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Evaluation of satisfaction with the training methods used and the effect of training methods on perceptions of competence during clinical practice
At the first interview, the Visual Comparison Scale was applied to all students in both groups as a pre-test
Case-based teaching will be provided to second-year students who take the risky pregnancy and care course for the first time, who are included in the case-based teaching group by randomization method.
The control group is the group in which no intervention was made.
Case-based instruction will be applied to the students in the intervention group. "Student Information Form", "Critical Thinking Motivation Scale", "Academic Motivation Scale" and "Knowledge Assessment Form" will be . All students will receive classical in-class theoretical education about such as hemorrhages, hyperemesis gravidarum, oligohydramnios and urinary system diseases. In the intervention group, after the theoretical teaching of each subject within the scope of the Risky Pregnancy and Care course, cases prepared on the basis of the subject taught to the students will be applied. "Student Information Form (13th and 14th questions)", "Critical Thinking Motivation Scale", "Academic Motivation Scale", "Knowledge Assessment Form" and "Visual Comparison Scale" will be applied to all students as post-test data after case-based teaching of four topics.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Kahramanmaraş, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey (Türkiye)
Gholami M, Changaee F, Karami K, Shahsavaripour Z, Veiskaramian A, Birjandi M. Effects of multiepisode case-based learning (CBL) on problem-solving ability and learning motivation of nursing students in an emergency care course. J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Esra KARATAŞ OKYAY, PhD
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
72 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 14, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2024
Study Start
March 19, 2024
Actual (reported)Four weeks after the first interview, the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale is administered as a pre-test to all students in both groups.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
we don't share individual participant data with other researchers
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: