ACT-GLOBAL THROMBOLYSIS (ACT-WHEN-001) Domain Within the ACT-GLOBAL Adaptive Platform Trial-NCT06352632
ACT-WHEN
A Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Blinded-endpoint Trial to Optimize the Use of Intravenous Tenecteplase in Participants With Acute Ischemic Stroke (ACT-GLOBAL THROMBOLYSIS (ACT WHEN-001) Within A Multi-faCtorial, mulTi-arm, Multi-staGe, Randomised, gLOBal Adaptive pLatform Trial for Stroke (ACT-GLOBAL) NCT06352632
1 other identifier
interventional
4,000
2 countries
24
Brief Summary
This domain has a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) design. Up to 4,000 patients with presumed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) will be followed for 90 days (or until death, if prior to 90 days). The end of the trial is defined as the date that all participants have completed their Day 90 assessment. This domain aim is to efficiently, reliably, and simultaneously, determine the comparative effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight), vs. low-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg body weight) in all patients who present to hospital with acute ischemic stroke and are considered for intravenous thrombolysis. In addition, this domain also seeks to study standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight), vs. low-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg body weight) vs. no TNK upfront with rescue IA TNK if necessary (in those eligible for emergency EVT) and no TNK upfront in those who have taken DOACs during the preceding 48 hours. This domain therefore seeks to generate more robust randomized evidence to guide clinicians in their decisions over the balance of risks and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase wherever such evidence is currently insufficient. This domain will currently evaluate four research questions in relation to the use of IVT with tenecteplase:
- 1.In patients with recent (48 hours) intake of a standard-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), how should IVT be used? - Use standard-dose (0.25 mg/kg body weight) or low-dose tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg) or not at all.
- 2.In patients planned to be treated with endovascular thrombectomy, how should tenecteplase be used? -Treat with IV tenecteplase (standard- or low-dose) or not at all.
- 3.In any patient receiving IVT, what is the optimal dose of tenecteplase? - use standard-dose (0.25 mg/kg body weight) or low-dose tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg).
- 4.To what extent is the treatment effect of standard- vs. low-dose tenecteplase modified by key patient characteristics, such as diabetes, prior antiplatelet therapy, renal failure, or frailty, old age or having a heavy burden of cerebral small vessel disease on brain imaging.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2024
Longer than P75 for phase_3
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2030
September 17, 2025
September 1, 2024
6 years
February 5, 2024
September 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A reduction of functional dependence analyzed across the whole distribution of outcomes assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS),
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) -which scores of 0 to 1 indicate a favourable outcome without or with symptoms but no disability, scores of 2 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
From enrollment to the Day 90 assessment - Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner
Secondary Outcomes (14)
90-day mortality
From enrollment to the Day 90 assessment.
Proportion of participants with a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 at Day 90.
Completed by telephone at the Day 90 assessment (Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner)
Proportion of participants with a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 at Day 90.
Completed by telephone at the Day 90 assessment (Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner)
Health-related quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L at Day 90.
Completed by telephone at the Day 90 assessment (Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner)
The frequencies of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) from enrollment up to Day 4
From enrollment ( randomization) to the Day 4
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight)
NO INTERVENTIONThe intervention group will receive intravenous tenecteplase as a single bolus as per the standard manufacturers' instructions for use. The dose administered will be 0.25 mg/kg body weight (maximum dose 25 mg) over 10-20 seconds as soon as possible after randomization.
2) IVT with tenecteplase at low-dose: 0.18 mg/kg
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention group will receive intravenous tenecteplase as a single bolus as per the standard manufacturers' instructions for use. The dose administered will be 0.18 mg/kg body weight (maximum dose 18 mg) over 10-20 seconds as soon as possible after randomization.
3) No IV thrombolysis [(only in those undergoing EVT or those on DOACs)
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo intravenous tenecteplase only applied to subjects on DOACs over the last 24 hours or those planned for emergency EVT
Interventions
Thrombolytic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with disabling AIS presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset or last known well who may benefit from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase. Patients potentially eligible for IVT with conditions described as relative contraindications in national guidelines where physician discretion is recommended are eligible. Patients who received a DOAC, and those planned for emergency EVT are eligible.
- Consent process completed as per national laws and regulation and the applicable ethics committee requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Any absolute contraindication for IV thrombolysis per current national guidelines. Examples include those who are actively bleeding, had recent intracranial surgery, head trauma, intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage, or a bleeding diathesis.
- Minor stroke patients with non-disabling symptoms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (24)
The George Institute for Global Health
Sydney, Barangaroo, NSW 2000, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Monash University (Box Hill)
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
Medicine Hat Regional Hospital
Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada
Red Deer Regional Hospital
Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, A, Canada
Kelowna Regional Hospital
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Brandon Regional Hospital
Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
University of Manitoba - Winnipeg Health Science Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center (Halifax)
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Health Sciences North Horizon Sante-Nord
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
McMaster University Hamilton Health Sciences Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Lawson Health Research Institute- London
London, Ontario, Canada
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Queen Elizabeth Hospital (PEI)
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS Fleurimont Hôpital (Sherbrooke)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bijoy K Menon, MD
University of Calgary
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Anderson, MD
The George Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The trial will have allocation concealment and blinded endpoint assessment, but open-label treatment. Given the time sensitive nature of acute stroke treatment, blinding the enrolling personnel to treatment assignment is not practical. Clinical site staff, including the Principal Investigator (PI), sub-investigators, clinic site staff, and the Sponsor will not be blinded to treatment allocated or received. In the event of an emergency the PI will be already unblinded. The trial will have blinded endpoint assessment on Day 90, with central blinded assessors contacting the participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2024
Study Start
September 26, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Domain information and tabular trial results will be posted on the National Institutes of Health's website www.clinicaltrials.gov within one year of domain completion.