Normal Saline Flushing With And Without Heparin Lock In Maintaining Small Bore Intercostal Chest Catheter (ICC) Patency
SENSHIP
Safety And Efficacy Of 8 Hourly Normal Saline Flushing With And Without Heparin Lock In Maintaining Small Bore Intercostal Chest Catheter (ICC) Patency ; A Prospective Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pleural diseases are among the most common clinical problems encountered in healthcare settings in Malaysia and even worldwide. Most patients presented in a hospital setting with pleural diseases will need pleural aspirations or thoracentesis and chest drains for a variety of reasons. Healthcare providers will often be exposed to patients requiring pleural drainage hence it is important to be aware of safe techniques and procedures of insertion and also maintaining the pleural drainage systems to yield beneficial results. Most often, smaller catheters were deemed to be less effective in view of slower drainage rates and associated with high risk of blockage. However presently , in tertiary hospital settings small bore intercostal chest catheters (SBICC) have become an alternative to large bore intercostal catheters (LBICC). SBICC has been found to be equally effective, less painful and easily tolerated by patients. Hence, proper maintenance of SBICC should be undertaken to reduce rates of occlusion and to yield most benefits from the pleural aspirations procedures. British Thoracic Society in their latest guidelines recommends the use of small bore intercostal chest drain as the first choice in draining pleural effusions. The success of draining pleural effusions with a SBICC has shown variable rates of success among different studies conducted. Most common issues faced are drain blockage and drain dislodgement. There is limited data comparing the use of normal saline flushing versus fibrinolytic drug lock in maintaining patency of small bore intercostal chest drains in draining pleural effusions. This has lead us in conducting this research to compare the rates of partial or complete occlusions among normal saline flush with and without heparin saline lock in maintaining the patency of small bore intercostal chest catheter among patients with pleural diseases in Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, UKM requiring chest drains insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
November 19, 2025
November 1, 2025
3 years
February 18, 2024
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the rate (in percentage) of occlusions of intercostal chest catheter in participants underwent normal saline flushing with and without heparin lock
Participants who underwent intercostal chest catheter insertion who received normal saline flushing with and without heparin lock.
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
Secondary Outcomes (5)
To determine the onset of intercostal chest catheter occlusions (in hours)
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
To determine the change of hemoglobin (in g/dL) post ICC insertion
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
To determine the change of platelet (in 10 9/L) post ICC insertion
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
To determine the adverse effects of heparin saline lock
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
To assess the number of fenestrations occluded (in numbers from 0-5) with fibrin or blood clots
From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain
Study Arms (2)
Participants who underwent ICC with normal saline flushing and heparin lock
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who underwent intercostal chest catheter with normal saline flushing with heparin lock. Instillation done with 20 mls of Normal Saline flush followed by heparin saline lock, every 6 hours by a three way stopcock.
Participants who underwent ICC with normal saline flushing without heparin lock
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who underwent intercostal chest catheter with normal saline flushing without heparin lock. Instillation done with 20 mls of Normal Saline flush , every 6 hours by a three way stopcock.
Interventions
Participants with intercostal chest catheter who underwent normal saline flushing with heparin saline lock
Participants with intercostal chest catheter who underwent normal saline flushing without heparin saline lock
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients admitted in medical wards for pleural effusion who had small bore intercostal catheters inserted.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with hydropneumothorax with small bore intercostal catheters
- Patients with septated effusion planned for intrapleural fibrinolysis
- Patients with severe coagulopathy
- INR ≥ 1.5
- PT \> 37s
- aPTT \> 100s
- Patients with thrombocytopenia of less than 50 x 109/L
- Patients who has not consented to be involved in the study
- Patients with indwelling pleural catheters
- Unconscious patients will be excluded from this study
- Patients with poor GCS score will be excluded from this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National University of Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 53300, Malaysia
Related Publications (11)
Horsley A, Jones L, White J, Henry M. Efficacy and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1857-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1857.
PMID: 17167009RESULTMaskell N; British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline Group. British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guidelines--2010 update. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65(8):667-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.140236. No abstract available.
PMID: 20685739RESULTKeeling AN, Leong S, Logan PM, Lee MJ. Empyema and effusion: outcome of image-guided small-bore catheter drainage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9197-0. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
PMID: 17943347RESULTDavies HE, Merchant S, McGown A. A study of the complications of small bore 'Seldinger' intercostal chest drains. Respirology. 2008 Jun;13(4):603-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01296.x. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
PMID: 18422864RESULTPorcel JM, Azzopardi M, Koegelenberg CF, Maldonado F, Rahman NM, Lee YC. The diagnosis of pleural effusions. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2015;9(6):801-15. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2015.1098535. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
PMID: 26449328RESULTParulekar W, Di Primio G, Matzinger F, Dennie C, Bociek G. Use of small-bore vs large-bore chest tubes for treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):19-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.19.
PMID: 11451810RESULTMehra S, Heraganahally S, Sajkov D, Morton S, Bowden J. The effectiveness of small-bore intercostal catheters versus large-bore chest tubes in the management of pleural disease with the systematic review of literature. Lung India. 2020 May-Jun;37(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_229_19.
PMID: 32367840RESULTCollop NA, Kim S, Sahn SA. Analysis of tube thoracostomy performed by pulmonologists at a teaching hospital. Chest. 1997 Sep;112(3):709-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.709.
PMID: 9315804RESULTHooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis A, Clive AO, Morley A, White P, Medford AR, Harvey JE, Darby M, Zahan-Evans N, Maskell NA. Pleural irrigation trial (PIT): a randomised controlled trial of pleural irrigation with normal saline versus standard care in patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):456-63. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00147214. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26022948RESULTGoossens GA. Flushing and Locking of Venous Catheters: Available Evidence and Evidence Deficit. Nurs Res Pract. 2015;2015:985686. doi: 10.1155/2015/985686. Epub 2015 May 14.
PMID: 26075094RESULTShaikh N. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Jan;4(1):97-102. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.76843.
PMID: 21633576RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid, MBBS (IIUM)
National University of Malaysia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2024
First Posted
March 18, 2024
Study Start
March 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share