Enhancing Functional Hand Recovery Through Nerve Reconstruction in Total Brachial Plexus Birth Injury
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interpreting the published outcomes of hand function in total BPBI is confounded by a lack of clear documentation regarding detailed surgical findings and management strategies. Investigators have followed a well-defined protocol for surgical reconstruction with the primary objective being reinnervation of the lower trunk using the best available root. In this paper, Investigators outline the details of the strategy and provide a comprehensive analysis of the nerve reconstruction techniques and the resulting functional outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2025
CompletedMarch 15, 2024
March 1, 2024
1 year
March 2, 2024
March 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Active Movement Scale (AMS)
All patients included in the study were evaluated using the Active Movement Scale (AMS), which grades upper extremity movements from 0 to 7. Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered successful in demonstrating functionally useful movement; this is a 50% and full range of movement against gravity, respectively.Attention was focused on sex movements primarily involving hand function including wrist, finger, and thumb flexion and extension.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Al-Qattan pronation/Supination score
1 year
Raimondi hand score
1 year
Interventions
In the adopted strategy, anatomical reconstruction was always performed when feasible and the lower trunk was considered the primary reinnervation target. Anatomical reconstruction of the plexus was attempted in the presence of at least three available roots; the best quality root stump (usually C5) was used for hand reanimation, while the lower ruptured roots were directed towards the upper and middle trunks. If one or more of the remaining root stumps were of doubtful quality, the compromised roots were grafted to the posterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks, while elbow flexion could be restored by transferring the intercostal nerves (T3-5) to the lateral cord. The lateral root of the median nerve was also included in the intercostal nerve transfer to restore hand sensations. In all cases, the spinal accessory nerve was directly sutured to the suprascapular nerve to restore rotator cuff function.
Eligibility Criteria
The study will include at least 50 children: Who underwent brachial plexus exploration and reconstruction for total OBPP. who have reached at least four years of follow-up Excluding children who had selective distal neurotization for restoration of specific functions without brachial plexus exploration or who had secondary procedures to the hand.
You may qualify if:
- Patients Who underwent brachial plexus exploration and reconstruction for total OBPP.
- who have reached at least four years of follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Excluding children who had selective distal neurotization for restoration of specific functions without brachial plexus exploration or who had secondary procedures to the hand.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University Hospitals
Asyut, 71526, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Haerle M, Gilbert A. Management of complete obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200403000-00012.
PMID: 15076607BACKGROUNDAl-Qattan MM. Assessment of the motor power in older children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Feb;28(1):46-9. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0831.
PMID: 12531668BACKGROUNDBorschel GH, Clarke HM. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1 Suppl):144e-155e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a80798.
PMID: 19568147BACKGROUNDPondaag W, Malessy MJ. Recovery of hand function following nerve grafting and transfer in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg. 2006 Jul;105(1 Suppl):33-40. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.105.1.33.
PMID: 16871868BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2024
First Posted
March 15, 2024
Study Start
March 15, 2024
Primary Completion
March 15, 2025
Study Completion
March 15, 2025
Last Updated
March 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share