Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Cryogenic Medical Device for Treatment of Common and Plantar Warts
Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Cryogenic Medical Device in Treatment of Common and Plantar Warts Versus a Comparator Product.
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study was set-up to evaluate clinical efficacy of Pixie CO2 versus a comparator product (Wortie®) for the treatment of common and plantar warts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2024
CompletedMarch 13, 2024
March 1, 2024
9 months
December 16, 2022
March 7, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of subjects with clinical wart remission
Comparison of the percentage of subjects with clinical wart remission after 1, 2 and 3 treatments with the tested product group versus comparator group, as observed during clinical evaluation of the treated wart by a dermatologist.
1 treatment (Day 0), 2 treatments (Day 15), 3 treatments (Day 30)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of treatments
1 treatment (Day 0), 2 treatments (Day 15), 3 treatments (Day 30)
Efficacy of the freezing process (Surface Area)
Measurement treatment 1 (Day 0), Measurement treatment 2 (Day 15), Measurement treatment 3 (Day 30)
Diameter of the wart
Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)
Roughness of the wart
Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)
Thickness of the wart (For common warts only)
Before treatment Day 0, after 1 treatment (Day 3 & Day 15), after 2 treatments (Day 30), after 3 treatments (Day 45)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pixie CO2
EXPERIMENTALCryogenic treatment of warts (Carbonic ice tablet) Maximum 3 application by the technician in charge of the study Apply 15 seconds for a wart on hand or arm and 40 seconds for a wart on feet or toe
Wortie®
ACTIVE COMPARATORCryogenic treatment of wart (dimethylether-based product) Maximum 3 application by the technician in charge of the study. Apply 20 seconds for a wart on hand or arm and 40 seconds for a wart on feet or toe
Interventions
Treatment of common and plantar warts by cryotherapy treatment.
Treatment of common and plantar warts by cryotherapy treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subject.
- Sex: male or female.
- Age: more than 4 years old.
- Subject presenting at least 1 new common wart on hand or a plantar wart (wart present since less than 6 months) of a size less than 0.8cm.
- Subject, including minors aged more than 16 years, having given freely and expressly his/her informed consent.
- Minor whose legal guardians have given their free and express informed consent.
- Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, as defined in the present rotocol, at the Investigator's appreciation.
- Subject or child's legal guardians being affiliated to a health social security system.
- Female subject of childbearing potential should use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen (at the Investigator's discretion) since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant, parturient, or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision.
- Subject in a social or sanitary establishment.
- Major subject who is under guardianship or who is not able to express his consent.
- Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the Investigator's judgment.
- Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results.
- Subject with a cutaneous disease other than common and plantar warts, on the studied zone.
- Subject with a known allergy to one of the component of the products or to the comparator.
- Subject who has diabetes.
- Subject having problems with blood circulation, or having a blood clotting condition.
- Subject with immune deficiency or autoimmune disease.
- Subject presenting more than 10 warts on the body.
- Subject presenting bleeding warts.
- Subject presenting birthmarks, moles, warts with hairs growing from them, or any other spots on the treated and surrounding area.
- Subject having a sensitive skin, inflamed, infected, irritated, red, damaged, cut, grazed, diseased or itchy on the treated zone.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oystershell NVlead
Study Sites (1)
Dermscan Poland
Gdansk, 80-288, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ewa KARAMON
ewaczek20@wp.pl
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2022
First Posted
March 13, 2024
Study Start
November 7, 2019
Primary Completion
August 10, 2020
Study Completion
August 10, 2020
Last Updated
March 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03