NCT06307691

Brief Summary

For the purpose of the study, patients will be divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B. In Group (A), 14 immediate implants will be placed using traditional drilling technique, while in Group (B), 14 immediate implants will be placed using OD drilling technique Osseodensification is a system for implant osteotomy preparation, it compresses the cancellous bone around the revolving drills. It largely improves low bone volume by physically increasing the interlocking between the bone and the implant surface. The Densah burs enhances bone density while generating the least amount of heat. Traditional oversized drilling is the regular manufacturer recommended technique of drilling. It functions by cutting the bone during osteotomy preparation by sharp fluted drills. The undersizing of the preparation allows the implant to partially compact the bone during insertion. The objective of the current study is to compare between osseodensification drilling protocol versus traditional undersized drilling protocol in immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary region in terms of implant stability.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress78%
Mar 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Implant stability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Implant stability quotient (ISQ)

    resonance frequency analysis

    1 week, 2 week, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Crestal bone level

    day of the surgery (baseline), at 3 and 6 months postoperatively)

Study Arms (2)

Control: conventional drilling

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Atraumatic extraction followed by osteotomy preparation. Osteotomy site will be prepared using conventional drills. Implant placement will follow.

Procedure: Conventional drilling

Intervention: Osseodensification

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Atraumatic extraction followed by osteotomy preparation. Osteotomy site will be prepared using Densah bur. Implant placement will follow.

Procedure: Osseodensification drilling

Interventions

Atraumatic extraction, followed by sequential drilling using conventional drills

Control: conventional drilling

Atraumatic extraction, followed by osteotomy prepared using densah bur (sequential drilling)

Intervention: Osseodensification

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients in need of extraction of a single, unrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone including maxillary anteriors and premolars
  • Age range between 20-60 years old
  • An intact buccal plate of bone after extraction
  • Medically free patients (Brightman. 1994)
  • Cooperative patients willing to follow up for the duration of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute infection in the implant site
  • Patients incapable of maintaining oral hygiene
  • Pregnant and nursing female patients
  • Smokers (more than 5 cigarettes per day)
  • A habit of bruxism
  • Periodontal disease
  • Subjects who have a systemic disease which affects bone healing as diabetes
  • Use of bone metabolism medicines; (Bisphosphonates) .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

    PMID: 25503901BACKGROUND
  • Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.

    PMID: 6809663BACKGROUND
  • Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol. 1997 Oct;68(10):915-23. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.915.

    PMID: 9358358BACKGROUND
  • Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(4):388-99.

    PMID: 8270307BACKGROUND
  • Agliardi E, Panigatti S, Clerico M, Villa C, Malo P. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01852.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

    PMID: 20105197BACKGROUND
  • Schwartz-Arad D, Grossman Y, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sites of molar teeth. J Periodontol. 2000 May;71(5):839-44. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.839.

    PMID: 10872969BACKGROUND
  • Marquezan M, Osorio A, Sant'Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

    PMID: 21635560BACKGROUND
  • Farronato D, Manfredini M, Stocchero M, Caccia M, Azzi L, Farronato M. Influence of Bone Quality, Drilling Protocol, Implant Diameter/Length on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Comparative Study on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2020 Jun 1;46(3):182-189. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00145.

    PMID: 32582919BACKGROUND
  • Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Feb;38(2):88-95; quiz 96.

    PMID: 28156122BACKGROUND
  • Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358.

    PMID: 26584202BACKGROUND
  • Boustany CM, Reed H, Cunningham G, Richards M, Kanawati A. Effect of a modified stepped osteotomy on the primary stability of dental implants in low-density bone: a cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):48-55. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3720.

    PMID: 25615915BACKGROUND
  • Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

    PMID: 27741329BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Omar M Ibrahim, Master

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Omnia K Tawfik, Lecturer

    Cairo University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hany El Nahaas, Professor

    Cairo Unversity

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

omnia K tawfik, Lecturer

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
patients will be randomly selected into either group using computer generated randomization using (www.randomizer.org). The randomized numbers will be allocated to each site in each patient and will be placed in opaque, sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes. patients will be randomly allocated to test and control groups using randomization schedule. Masking/blinding: * Participants will be blinded * Blinding of the operator will be blinded * The outcome assessor will be blinded * The biostatistician will be blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Posted

March 13, 2024

Study Start

March 6, 2024

Primary Completion

December 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2026

Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Locations