Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For the purpose of the study, patients will be divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B. In Group (A), 14 immediate implants will be placed using traditional drilling technique, while in Group (B), 14 immediate implants will be placed using OD drilling technique Osseodensification is a system for implant osteotomy preparation, it compresses the cancellous bone around the revolving drills. It largely improves low bone volume by physically increasing the interlocking between the bone and the implant surface. The Densah burs enhances bone density while generating the least amount of heat. Traditional oversized drilling is the regular manufacturer recommended technique of drilling. It functions by cutting the bone during osteotomy preparation by sharp fluted drills. The undersizing of the preparation allows the implant to partially compact the bone during insertion. The objective of the current study is to compare between osseodensification drilling protocol versus traditional undersized drilling protocol in immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary region in terms of implant stability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2026
ExpectedMarch 19, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.8 years
March 6, 2024
March 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
resonance frequency analysis
1 week, 2 week, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Crestal bone level
day of the surgery (baseline), at 3 and 6 months postoperatively)
Study Arms (2)
Control: conventional drilling
ACTIVE COMPARATORAtraumatic extraction followed by osteotomy preparation. Osteotomy site will be prepared using conventional drills. Implant placement will follow.
Intervention: Osseodensification
ACTIVE COMPARATORAtraumatic extraction followed by osteotomy preparation. Osteotomy site will be prepared using Densah bur. Implant placement will follow.
Interventions
Atraumatic extraction, followed by sequential drilling using conventional drills
Atraumatic extraction, followed by osteotomy prepared using densah bur (sequential drilling)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in need of extraction of a single, unrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone including maxillary anteriors and premolars
- Age range between 20-60 years old
- An intact buccal plate of bone after extraction
- Medically free patients (Brightman. 1994)
- Cooperative patients willing to follow up for the duration of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute infection in the implant site
- Patients incapable of maintaining oral hygiene
- Pregnant and nursing female patients
- Smokers (more than 5 cigarettes per day)
- A habit of bruxism
- Periodontal disease
- Subjects who have a systemic disease which affects bone healing as diabetes
- Use of bone metabolism medicines; (Bisphosphonates) .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (12)
Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PMID: 25503901BACKGROUNDAdell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
PMID: 6809663BACKGROUNDSchwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol. 1997 Oct;68(10):915-23. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.915.
PMID: 9358358BACKGROUNDGelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(4):388-99.
PMID: 8270307BACKGROUNDAgliardi E, Panigatti S, Clerico M, Villa C, Malo P. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01852.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
PMID: 20105197BACKGROUNDSchwartz-Arad D, Grossman Y, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sites of molar teeth. J Periodontol. 2000 May;71(5):839-44. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.839.
PMID: 10872969BACKGROUNDMarquezan M, Osorio A, Sant'Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
PMID: 21635560BACKGROUNDFarronato D, Manfredini M, Stocchero M, Caccia M, Azzi L, Farronato M. Influence of Bone Quality, Drilling Protocol, Implant Diameter/Length on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Comparative Study on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2020 Jun 1;46(3):182-189. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00145.
PMID: 32582919BACKGROUNDGreenstein G, Cavallaro J. Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Feb;38(2):88-95; quiz 96.
PMID: 28156122BACKGROUNDTrisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358.
PMID: 26584202BACKGROUNDBoustany CM, Reed H, Cunningham G, Richards M, Kanawati A. Effect of a modified stepped osteotomy on the primary stability of dental implants in low-density bone: a cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):48-55. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3720.
PMID: 25615915BACKGROUNDHuwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
PMID: 27741329BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omar M Ibrahim, Master
Cairo University
- STUDY CHAIR
Omnia K Tawfik, Lecturer
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hany El Nahaas, Professor
Cairo Unversity
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- patients will be randomly selected into either group using computer generated randomization using (www.randomizer.org). The randomized numbers will be allocated to each site in each patient and will be placed in opaque, sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes. patients will be randomly allocated to test and control groups using randomization schedule. Masking/blinding: * Participants will be blinded * Blinding of the operator will be blinded * The outcome assessor will be blinded * The biostatistician will be blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2024
First Posted
March 13, 2024
Study Start
March 6, 2024
Primary Completion
December 20, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 20, 2026
Last Updated
March 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03