Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
1(33%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

1

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(2)
Completed(1)

Detailed Status

Completed1
Recruiting1
Enrolling by invitation1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
1
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed133%
recruiting133%
enrolling_by_invitation133%

Recent Activity

1 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
enrolling_by_invitationnot_applicable

Implant Stability Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling

NCT07719764
recruitingnot_applicable

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol

NCT06307691
completednot_applicable

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling Effect on Implant Stability

NCT05824949

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07719764Not Applicable

Implant Stability Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling

Enrolling By Invitation
NCT06307691Not Applicable

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol

Recruiting
NCT05824949Not Applicable

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling Effect on Implant Stability

Completed

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3