rTMS and Rehabilitation for Individuals With CRPS Type 1
Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Rehabilitation for Individuals With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Subjects with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 will be randomized to receive repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) followed by rehabilitation or sham rTMS followed by rehabilitation. Treatment will last for 4 weeks, with the first week including 4 rTMS treatments and 2 rehabilitation treatments. Subsequent weeks will include 2 rTMS treatments followed by 2 rehabilitation treatments. Outcome measures will include pain ratings, PROMIS questionnaires, global rating of change, and grip strength or 1 repetition maximum leg press.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 30, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.9 years
February 7, 2023
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Weekly Average
Subjects will be asked to rate their weekly average pain on a scale from 0-10 (0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worse possible pain).
Sessions 1 (week 1), 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4). Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) worse/least pain over 24 hours
Sessions 1 (week 1), 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4). Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS).
Sessions 1 (week 1), 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4). Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
Sessions 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4). Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session
Global Rating of Change Impact (GROCi)
Sessions 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4) Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Sessions 1 (week 1), 4 (week 1), 6 (week 2), 8 (week 3), 10 (week 4). Surveys will also be sent at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after last session.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
rTMS and Rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this arm will get rTMS to the contralateral motor cortex and best practice rehabilitation.
Sham rTMS and Rehabilitation
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects in this arm will get sham rTMS to the contralateral motor cortex and best practice rehabilitation.
Interventions
rTMS will be delivered using a commercially available magnetic stimulator (Rapid2, Magstim Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) with a figure-of-8 Air Film coil at 10 Hz. Coil orientation will be optimized for stimulation of the abductor pollicis brevis. Stimulation targeting will be identified using motor-evoked potentials (MEP) of the first dorsal interossei that will be monitored using electromyography (EMG) (Motion Lab Systems Inc., Baton Rouge, LA). The motor threshold (MT) of the muscle will then be identified by systematically adjusting the pulse intensity. The MT will be considered the lowest stimulation intensity at which 5 out of 10 MEPs have a peak-to-peak amplitude of at least 50 microvolts. rTMS will be performed at the identified optimal location at 10Hz using an intensity that is 80% of the MT. Pulse trains will be delivered for 10 seconds, with a 30-second rest for 20 repetitions.
Sham rTMS will be performed using the same methods as the active group, but a sham Air Film coil (Magstim Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) will be used. This coil looks and sounds like the active coil, but it does not deliver magnetic pulses.
Rehabilitation will consist of education, value-based goal setting, Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) (3 components described below), and graded activity. Subjects will complete activities at treatment sessions and be asked to perform certain treatment activities at home. Week 1: Pain education, functional value-based goal setting, laterality training (first component of GMI), one task for graded activity (task-based on patient goals) Week 2: Continue week 1 activity, add graded motor imagery (second component of GMI), progress 1st graded activity, and initiate 2nd graded activity exercise. Week 3- Mirror therapy (third component of GMI), assess knowledge and update education as needed, progress graded activity 1 and 2, and add 3rd graded activity if appropriate based on patient goals. Week 4- Continue with week 3 activities. Discuss experience with meditation and progress graded activity as tolerated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Upper or lower extremity CRPS Type 1 (also called RSD-Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy) of at least 6 months.
- Pain rating on NPRS of at least 4/10
- No initiation of a new intervention (i.e., medication, rehab, injections) in the previous 2 months.
- No plan to initiate a new intervention during the study treatment timeframe (4 weeks).
You may not qualify if:
- A history of seizures or epilepsy
- Intracranial metallic devices
- Pacemaker
- Intrathecal infusion pumps
- Brain or spinal cord stimulators with epidural electrodes
- Other ferromagnetic metallic intracranial implants
- Apparent mental or psychiatric disorder that prevents adequate informed consent
- Current pregnancy
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SUNY Upstate Medical Univeristy Institute of Human Performance
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
Related Publications (6)
Shafiee E, MacDermid J, Packham T, Walton D, Grewal R, Farzad M. The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on Pain and Disability for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2023 Feb 1;39(2):91-105. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001089.
PMID: 36650605BACKGROUNDEldufani J, Elahmer N, Blaise G. A medical mystery of complex regional pain syndrome. Heliyon. 2020 Feb 19;6(2):e03329. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03329. eCollection 2020 Feb.
PMID: 32149194BACKGROUNDLefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
PMID: 31901449BACKGROUNDPicarelli H, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC, Myczkowski ML, Luvisotto TB, Yeng LT, Fonoff ET, Pridmore S, Marcolin MA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is efficacious as an add-on to pharmacological therapy in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PMID: 20430702BACKGROUNDGaertner M, Kong JT, Scherrer KH, Foote A, Mackey S, Johnson KA. Advancing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Methods for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Open-Label Study of Paired Theta Burst and High-Frequency Stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2018 Jun;21(4):409-416. doi: 10.1111/ner.12760. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
PMID: 29504190BACKGROUNDPleger B, Janssen F, Schwenkreis P, Volker B, Maier C, Tegenthoff M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex attenuates pain perception in complex regional pain syndrome type I. Neurosci Lett. 2004 Feb 12;356(2):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.037.
PMID: 14746870BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Rufa, DPT, PhD
SUNY Upstate Medical Univerity
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Subjects, providers of physical therapy, primary investigator, and outcome assessor will be blinded to group allocation. The provider delivering the rTMS will not be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2023
First Posted
February 27, 2023
Study Start
February 28, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share