NCT06301503

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block (LPB-SNB) by comparing the postoperative quality of recovery as assessed by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire, in patients who received a combination of LPB-SNB versus patients who received the traditional intravenous opioid, after lower extremity orthopaedic surgeries with spinal anaesthesia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Will there be a significant difference in QoR-40 scores between both groups?
  • Will the combined LPB-SNB significantly reduces opioid consumption within the first 24 hours?
  • Will the combined LPB-SNB significantly increases postoperative duration of analgesia? Participants will:
  • Receive a coded sealed opaque envelope containing their randomly allocated intervention group; first group receives a combination of lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block, while the second group receives no block at all. This information would not be disclosed to the participants.
  • Receive an explanation on how to use the patient controlled analgesia (PCA) to deliver intravenous opioid, and instructions on filling in the QoR-40 questionnaire. Researchers will then compare the results between both groups to see if the combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block successfully provides adequate analgesia and enhance postoperative quality of recovery after lower extremity orthopaedic surgeries.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 2, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 2, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Quality of Recovery as assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire

    The QoR-40 questionnaire is gaining popularity due to considerable validation of its utility in measuring quality of recovery. The QoR-40 questionnaire has 40 questions divided into 5 assessment dimensions, namely comfort (12 questions), emotions (9 questions), physical independence (5 questions), support (8 questions) and pain (6 questions), where each question has a value of 1 to 5 based on the Likert scale.

    24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Postoperative Intravenous Opioid Consumption

    24 hours postoperatively

  • Postoperative Analgesia Duration

    Within 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

1. USG Guided Combined LPB-SNB with Isobaric Bupivacaine

EXPERIMENTAL

After completing the surgical procedure under spinal anaesthesia, participants are positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the side to be blocked facing upwards. Identification of the lumbar plexus nerves is carried out with ultrasound guidance using the trident approach. Under aseptic conditions, local anesthetic infiltration with 2% lidocaine (3ml)was given, and a lumbar plexus block (LPB) technique was performed by inserting a 100mm insulated nerve block needle through the transverse process, delivering a bolus of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine (20ml). Without changing the participant's position, the sciatic nerve is identified by the gluteal approach. After local anesthetic infiltration with 2% lidocaine (3ml), sciatic nerve block (SNB) was performed by inserting a 100 mm insulated nerve block needle to the sciatic nerve, delivering a bolus of 0.25% isobaric bupivacaine (20ml). Aspiration is carried out before injecting anaesthetic agent on each puncture sites.

Drug: USG Guided Combined LPB-SNB with Isobaric Bupivacaine

2. Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Postoperatively, participants in this group was positioned in the lateral decubitus position and both the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were identified using ultrasound. Local anesthetic infiltration was given at both puncture sites, but participants of this group did not receive a combination of LPB-SNB with bupivacaine.

Drug: Control

Interventions

Local anesthetic infiltration of 2% lidocaine (3ml) along with injection anaesthetic agent consisting of isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (20 ml)

Also known as: LPB, SNB, Lumbar Plexus Block, Sciatic Nerve Block, Psoas Compartment Block (PCB), PCB
1. USG Guided Combined LPB-SNB with Isobaric Bupivacaine

Local anesthetic infiltration of 2% lidocaine (3ml)

Also known as: PCA-Only, Non-Block
2. Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing lower extremity orthopaedic surgery with spinal anaesthesia
  • Patients aged between 18-65 years
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III
  • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) between 18-30 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of allergy towards the local anaesthetic agents used
  • Patients with contraindication to regional anaesthesia based on the American Society for Regional Anesthesia guidelines
  • Patients with pre-existing mental or psychological disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital

Denpasar, Bali, 80114, Indonesia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Touray ST, de Leeuw MA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Psoas compartment block for lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):750-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen298. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

    PMID: 18945717BACKGROUND
  • Strid JMC, Sauter AR, Ullensvang K, Andersen MN, Daugaard M, Bendtsen MAF, Soballe K, Pedersen EM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in volunteers; a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):430-438. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew464.

    PMID: 28203808BACKGROUND
  • Horasanli E, Gamli M, Pala Y, Erol M, Sahin F, Dikmen B. A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(1):29-34. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000100006.

  • Aissa I, Wartiti LE, Bouhaba N, Khallikane S, Moutaoukil M, Kartite N, Elkoundi A, Benakrout A, Chlouchi A, Elbouti A, Najout H, Grine A, Touab R, Zaizi A, Youssef J, Bakkali H, Balkhi H, Bensghir M. [Combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block in the emergency surgery for pertrochanteric fracture: an alternative technique in patients at high risk of anaesthetic complications]. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 3;37:12. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.12.21392. eCollection 2020. French.

Study Officials

  • Jeremia A Wiranata, MD

    Udayana University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Numbers were prepared in sealed envelopes prepared by a third party not involved in the study to ensure allocation concealment, and handed over to the anesthetist performing the block before surgery. Both participants and outcome assessors would be blinded to the group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: One hundred participants are to be randomly assigned by a computer-generated random number table into two parallel groups and 1:1 allocation to either receive a combination of LPB-SNB or no block at all.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2024

First Posted

March 8, 2024

Study Start

March 9, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 2, 2024

Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning from 6 months and ending in 2 years after online article publication
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal of related studies. Proposals should be directed to jeremiaalvian@student.unud.ac.id. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Locations