Pain Type and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Treatment
Mechanistic-Based Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
2 other identifiers
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a severe pain condition affecting 3-8 million people in the United States lacking treatments that work. Emotional suffering is common in IC/BPS and known to make physical symptoms worse, and studies show patient sub-groups respond differently to treatment. Individuals with IC/BPS have distinct subgroups, or "phenotypes," largely characterized by the distribution of pain throughout the body. Supported by our preliminary evidence, the overall goal of this project is to assess how IC/BPS phenotype may affect response to two different therapies often given without regard to patient phenotype, pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for IC/BPS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 5, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 4, 2028
January 21, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.9 years
February 29, 2024
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in response to treatment by phenotype measured by the Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale.
GRA provides a global index used to rate the response of a condition to an intervention. The GRA is a 7-point centered scale that assesses patient impression of change in IC/BPS symptoms since entering the study ranging from 7= "very much worse" to 1= "very much improved." This scale will be administered at post-treatment and at follow-up. Global improvement is a core domain recommended for conducting clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments for chronic pain according to Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). We will examine the mean differences in GRA scores by phenotype in each treatment condition, and we will then calculate the percentage of patients classified as treatment responders (GRA\<3) within each treatment and phenotype.
Post-treatment (either Week 8 or 10)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Chronic Overlapping Pain Condition-Screener (COPCS)
Baseline (Week 0)
Quantitative Sensory Testing - Tolerance Average (QST-TOL)
Baseline (Week 0), Post-treatment (either Week 8 or 10), Follow-up (Week 24)
Quantitative Sensory Testing - Threshold Average (QST-THR)
Baseline (Week 0), Post-treatment (either Week 8 or 10), Follow-up (Week 24)
Quantitative Sensory Testing - Temporal Summation (QST-TS)
Baseline, (Week 0), Post-treatment (either Week 8 or 10), Follow-up (Week 24)
Urinary Nerve Growth Factor (NGF)
Baseline, (Week 0), Post-treatment (either Week 8 or 10), Follow-up (Week 24)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Psychosocial Treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe psychosocial self-management intervention consists of 8 weekly 50-minute individual visits with an assigned trained therapist. Sessions follow a structured protocol that has been developed with the patient population and tested in a prior study. Treatment modules are individualized and include topics such as pain coping strategies, relaxation training, education on IC/BPS, and communication strategies.
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe pelvic floor physical therapy condition consists of 10 weekly 45-minute individual visits with an assigned trained physical therapist. In IC/BPS, pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) uses manual manipulation to release localized muscle tension, trigger points, and correct other scars and restrictions to reduce pain and urgency symptoms. Specific techniques will include external connective tissue manipulation to the abdominal wall, back, buttocks and thighs, myofascial trigger point release, and internal transvaginal/transrectal treatment of the soft tissues of the pelvic floor with connective tissue and myofascial manipulation to pelvic floor musculature
Interventions
The psychosocial self-management intervention consists of 8 weekly 50-minute individual visits with an assigned trained therapist. Sessions follow a structured protocol that has been developed with the patient population and tested in a prior study. Treatment modules are individualized and include topics such as pain coping strategies, relaxation training, education on IC/BPS, and communication strategies.
The pelvic floor physical therapy condition consists of 10 weekly 45-minute individual visits with an assigned trained physical therapist. In IC/BPS, pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) uses manual manipulation to release localized muscle tension, trigger points, and correct other scars and restrictions to reduce pain and urgency symptoms. Specific techniques will include external connective tissue manipulation to the abdominal wall, back, buttocks and thighs, myofascial trigger point release, and internal transvaginal/transrectal treatment of the soft tissues of the pelvic floor with connective tissue and myofascial manipulation to pelvic floor musculature
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older;
- Diagnosis of IC/BPS as indicated by structured assessments;
- Capable of giving written informed consent;
- Able to enroll for the duration of the study period;
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbid neurological conditions including spinal cord injury or systematic neurologic illnesses, or central nervous system diseases such as brain tumor or stroke;
- Current or history of diagnosis of primary psychotic or major thought disorder within the past five years;
- Hospitalization for psychiatric reasons other than suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, and/or PTSD (within the past 5 years);
- Psychiatric or behavioral conditions in which symptoms are unstable or severe (e.g. current delirium, mania, psychosis, active suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, substance abuse dependency) reported within the past six months;
- Non-English speaking;
- Presenting symptoms at time of screening that would interfere with participation, specifically active suicidal ideation with intent to harm oneself or active delusional or psychotic thinking;
- Difficulties or limitations communicating over the telephone or via teleconferencing systems;
- Any planned life events that would interfere with participating in the key elements of the study;
- Any major active medical issues that could preclude participation;
- Currently pregnant;
- Currently being treated for cancer;
- Cancer-related pain;
- Recently or actively participating in treatment similar to those being investigated (e.g. individual psychotherapy or pelvic floor pt).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt Urology Cool Springs
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
Related Publications (8)
Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, Forrest JB, Gordon B, Gray M, Mayer RD, Newman D, Nyberg L Jr, Payne CK, Wesselmann U, Faraday MM; Interstitial Cystitis Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
PMID: 21497847BACKGROUNDRampakakis E, Ste-Marie PA, Sampalis JS, Karellis A, Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Real-life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia. RMD Open. 2015 Sep 14;1(1):e000146. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000146. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26535150BACKGROUNDSherman AL, Morris MC, Bruehl S, Westbrook TD, Walker LS. Heightened Temporal Summation of Pain in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and History of Trauma. Ann Behav Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):785-92. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9712-5.
PMID: 25967582BACKGROUNDStarkweather AR, Heineman A, Storey S, Rubia G, Lyon DE, Greenspan J, Dorsey SG. Methods to measure peripheral and central sensitization using quantitative sensory testing: A focus on individuals with low back pain. Appl Nurs Res. 2016 Feb;29:237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
PMID: 26856520BACKGROUNDLi J, Simone DA, Larson AA. Windup leads to characteristics of central sensitization. Pain. 1999 Jan;79(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00154-7.
PMID: 9928779BACKGROUNDShy ME, Frohman EM, So YT, Arezzo JC, Cornblath DR, Giuliani MJ, Kincaid JC, Ochoa JL, Parry GJ, Weimer LH; Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003 Mar 25;60(6):898-904. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000058546.16985.11.
PMID: 12654951BACKGROUNDEzenwa MO, Molokie RE, Wang ZJ, Yao Y, Suarez ML, Pullum C, Schlaeger JM, Fillingim RB, Wilkie DJ. Safety and Utility of Quantitative Sensory Testing among Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: Indicators of Neuropathic Pain? Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):282-93. doi: 10.1111/papr.12279. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
PMID: 25581383BACKGROUNDSchrepf A, Maixner W, Fillingim R, Veasley C, Ohrbach R, Smith S, Williams DA. The Chronic Overlapping Pain Condition Screener. J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
PMID: 37633574BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lindsey McKernan, PhD, MPH
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Study assessors will be blinded to the study primary outcome but will be aware of study treatment conditions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2024
First Posted
March 8, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 5, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 4, 2028
Last Updated
January 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share