NCT06299644

Brief Summary

The Investigators propose suture plication placement at the distal gastric body drives a significant portion of weight loss in endoscopic sleeve and sutures only need to be placed in the distal gastric body. Therefore, in this pilot study, the investigators aim to compare "belt" with "belt and suspenders" plication pattern using the Endomina system to determine percent total weight loss.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
20mo left

Started Sep 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2024

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2027

7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies (EBMT)Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies (EBT)Gastric emptyingEndoscopic Suturingendoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG)Weight LossBariatric EndoscopyWeight ManagementEndoscopic plicationGastric plication

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percent TWL (%TWL)

    Change in the percent total weight loss from baseline at 6 and 12 months.

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  • Adverse Events

    Presence of adverse events that develop post-procedure

    6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Gastric Emptying

    Baseline, 6 month, 12 months

  • Number of participants with improvement in fasting glucose

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  • Number of participants with improvement in Hemoglobin A1c (HgA1c %)

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  • Improvement in fasting lipids profile

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  • Number of participants with a change in ghrelin hormone values

    Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Belt and Suspenders Configuration

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with the Endomina system creating proximal and distal gastric plications (belt and suspenders configuration).

Device: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt and Suspenders

Belt Configuration

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with the Endomina system creating distal gastric plications (belt configuration).

Device: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt

Interventions

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt and suspender plications.

Also known as: Belt and Suspenders ESG
Belt and Suspenders Configuration

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt only plications.

Also known as: Belt ESG
Belt Configuration

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with 18-65 years of age
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
  • Capable of giving informed consent and available to return for follow-up visit

You may not qualify if:

  • Untreated H. pylori infection
  • Active gastric or duodenal ulceration
  • Malignant or premalignant gastric diseases (such as intestinal metaplasia, high grade dysplasia, gastric adenocarcinoma, or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST))
  • Severe reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles Classification (LA) Grade C or D)
  • Esophageal or gastric varices and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy
  • Gastroparesis
  • History of gastric surgery/endoscopic procedure
  • Active psychological issues preventing participation in a lifestyle modification program
  • Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight (uncontrolled hypothyroidism)
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Active smoking
  • Substance abuse
  • Serious health condition that increased risk of anesthesia and/or endoscopic procedure
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients who require Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Ibrahim AM, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Variation in Outcomes at Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):629-636. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.

    PMID: 28445566BACKGROUND
  • Docimo S Jr, Aylward L, Albaugh VL, Afaneh C, El Djouzi S, Ali M, Altieri MS, Carter J; American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and its role in the treatment of obesity: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Nov;19(11):1205-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Sep 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37813705BACKGROUND
  • Singh S, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Khan A, Bilal M, Ryan MB, Thompson CC. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

    PMID: 31932205BACKGROUND
  • Li P, Ma B, Gong S, Zhang X, Li W. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity patients: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06889-6. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

    PMID: 31236722BACKGROUND
  • Beran A, Matar R, Jaruvongvanich V, Rapaka BB, Alalwan A, Portela R, Ghanem O, Dayyeh BKA. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Meta-analysis of 6775 Individuals with Obesity. Obes Surg. 2022 Nov;32(11):3504-3512. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06254-y. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

    PMID: 36053446BACKGROUND
  • Jalal MA, Cheng Q, Edye MB. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2754-2762. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04591-4.

    PMID: 32304011BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityObesity, MorbidMetabolic DiseasesBody WeightWeight Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Weight Changes

Study Officials

  • Christopher C Thompson, MD, MSc

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michele B Ryan, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Endoscopy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Posted

March 8, 2024

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified data will be shared with other researchers upon written request to the PI. If PI approves of the research plan, data will be released after an Institutional Data Sharing Agreement is in place.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
12 months after publication of results. Available for 10 years.
Access Criteria
Formal written request to PI with research proposal/plan.

Locations