NCT06298396

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of stimulation parameters and different electrode modes on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 28, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 27, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 16, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 16, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 17, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 28, 2024

Results QC Date

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cochlear implantSensorineural hearing lossProgrammingSpeech perception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Paired Mean Difference Score for CNC Words Correct Between Default and LP1 MAPs in Quiet

    Speech perception in quiet was measured for each MAP using recorded CNC monosyllabic words. The goal of speech perception assessment in quiet was to compare % words correct for each of the conditions. The minimum score is 0% and maximum sore is 100%. A higher score means a better outcome. An average CNC word score for each MAP was calculated by combining the data from the specified timepoints.

    10 participants completed this test at Week 4, and 10 participants completed this at week 8

  • Paired Mean Difference Score in dB SRT (AuSTIN) Between Default and LP1 MAPs in Noise

    Speech perception in noise was measured using the Australian Speech Test in Noise (AuSTIN), which is a test that uses recorded BKB-like target sentences. The goal of the speech perception test in noise is to provide the Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) in dB for 50% speech intelligibility (dB SRT) There is no minimum score. The maximum score is 15 dB. A lower score means a better outcome. An average SRT score for each MAP was calculated by combining the data from the specified timepoints.

    10 participants completed the test at Week 4, 10 participants completed the test at Week 8

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Paired Mean Difference Score for CNC Words Correct Between LP1 and LP2 MAPs in Quiet

    10 participants completed the test at Week 4, 10 participants completed the test at Week 8

  • Paired Mean Difference Score in dB SRT (AuSTIN) Between LP1 and LP2 MAPs in Noise

    10 participants completed this test at Week 4, and 10 participants completed this at week 8

  • Paired Mean Difference Score in Percentage CNC Words Correct Between LP1 and LP3 MAPs in Quiet

    10 participants completed this test at Week 4, and 10 participants completed this at week 8

  • Paired Mean Difference Score in dB SRT (AuSTIN) Between LP1 and LP3 MAPs in Noise

    10 participants completed this test with at Week 4 and 10 participants completed this at week 8

  • Switching Acceptability Rating Between LP2 and LP3 MAPs

    10 participants were evaluated at week 4 and 10 participants were evaluated at week 8

Study Arms (1)

MAPs on Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7, Nucleus® 8 and Kanso® 2 Sound Processors

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive four different MAPs to use during two take-home periods and will then complete hearing assessments using each MAP.

Device: Program using default MAPDevice: Program using low-power 1 (LP1) MAPDevice: Program using low-power 2 (LP2) MAPDevice: Program using low-power 3 (LP3) MAP

Interventions

Each MAP uses a specific combination of stimulation parameters and electrode mode.

MAPs on Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7, Nucleus® 8 and Kanso® 2 Sound Processors

Each MAP uses a specific combination of stimulation parameters and electrode mode.

MAPs on Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7, Nucleus® 8 and Kanso® 2 Sound Processors

Each MAP uses a specific combination of stimulation parameters and electrode mode.

MAPs on Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7, Nucleus® 8 and Kanso® 2 Sound Processors

Each MAP uses a specific combination of stimulation parameters and electrode mode.

MAPs on Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7, Nucleus® 8 and Kanso® 2 Sound Processors

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Implanted with the CI600 Series (CI612, CI632, CI622, CI624), CI500 Series (CI512, CI513, CI532, CI522) or Freedom Series (CI24RE(CA), CI24RE(ST), CI24RE(CS), CI422)
  • At least three months after activation of the cochlear implant.
  • Eighteen years or older at the time of consent.
  • User of 900Hz ACE (Advanced Combination Encoder) strategy MAP.
  • Score of 20% or more for CNC words presented at 60dBSPL with CI alone in the test ear.
  • Fluent speaker in English.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • One or more electrodes turned off in the MAP used regularly.
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
  • Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families; immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
  • Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
  • Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device (unless the other investigation was/is a Cochlear sponsored investigation and determined by the investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cochlear Macquarie

Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing LossHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
PRS Specialist
Organization
Cochlear Limited

Study Officials

  • Esti Nel

    Cochlear

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
There is no masking in this study as all participants receive all MAPs (single group study model). The term "single-blinded" in the official title refers to the fact that participants are blinded to the order in which they receive the MAPs.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2024

First Posted

March 7, 2024

Study Start

May 27, 2024

Primary Completion

December 16, 2024

Study Completion

December 16, 2024

Last Updated

December 17, 2025

Results First Posted

December 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Cochlear do not have an approved platform for public sharing of IPD collected in this study. Data may be provided to individual researchers on request.

Locations