A Comparative Clinical Study to Assess Pain Score and Wound Healing Following Fractional Ablation With a DFG Laser and CO2 Laser
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study aims assess whether the Difference Frequency Generation (DFG) laser could be a better alternative to the CO2 laser in terms of reduced side effects and patient downtime.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
April 28, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.4 years
February 21, 2024
April 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score
Subjects will report pain score using VAS for the CO2 and DFG laser treated areas at Visit 1. The VAS is a 10cm long scale with 0cm representing "no pain" and 10cm representing "worst possible pain".
90 minutes
Wound healing time
Wound healing of the laser treated areas will be assessed and compared via photography at each visit.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Vessel density via OCT imaging
1 month
Vessel length via OCT imaging
1 month
Vessel thickness via OCT imaging
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL23 healthy subjects with treatment of the DFG and CO2 laser
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol;
- Subjects must be in good general health, based on answers provided during the screening visit;
- Subjects must be able to read and understand English.
- Subjects must be above the age of 18.
- Subjects must have no history of skin conditions that affect the integrity of the skin barrier.
You may not qualify if:
- Are pregnant or lactating;
- Have a history of drug or alcohol abuse or have reported habitual alcohol intake greater than 2 standard drinks per day \[e.g., 2 beers, 2 glasses of wine, or 2 mixed drinks\];
- Are smoking or have a history of smoking;
- Presence of eczema, psoriasis, skin wounds or ulcers, or any other skin disease on the thighs;
- Have birth marks, tattoos, scars, or any other disfiguration of the skin in the skin area of interest;
- Presence of sunburn or tan in the treatment area;
- Use of any topical application of retinoids in the area of interest or systemic retinoids in the past 6 months;
- Use of any prescription topical medication, such as corticosteroids or hydroquinone on the skin area of interest in the past 6 months;
- History of blood-clotting abnormality;
- History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring;
- History of allergic reaction to local anesthesia, aluminum chloride, and/or glycerol;
- Investigator, interfere with study evaluations or pose a risk to subject safety during the study;
- Exhibits any clinical conditions or takes any medication which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the study or pose a risk to subject safety during the study;
- Is not able to follow study protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MGH Clinical Unit for Research Trials & Outcomes in Skin
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (13)
Ibrahim O, Wenande E, Hogan S, Arndt KA, Haedersdal M, Dover JS. Challenges to laser-assisted drug delivery: Applying theory to clinical practice. Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):20-27. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22769. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
PMID: 29154501BACKGROUNDKo DY, Kim KH, Song KH. A randomized trial comparing methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy with and without Er:YAG ablative fractional laser treatment in Asian patients with lower extremity Bowen disease: results from a 12-month follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jan;170(1):165-72. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12627.
PMID: 24102369BACKGROUNDHaak CS, Togsverd-Bo K, Thaysen-Petersen D, Wulf HC, Paasch U, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-mediated photodynamic therapy of high-risk basal cell carcinomas--a randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;172(1):215-22. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13166. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
PMID: 24903544BACKGROUNDTogsverd-Bo K, Haak CS, Thaysen-Petersen D, Wulf HC, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Intensified photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with fractional CO2 laser: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10893.x.
PMID: 22348388BACKGROUNDWaibel JS, Wulkan AJ, Shumaker PR. Treatment of hypertrophic scars using laser and laser assisted corticosteroid delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):135-40. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22120. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
PMID: 23460557BACKGROUNDChoi SH, Kim KH, Song KH. Efficacy of ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy with short-incubation time for the treatment of facial and scalp actinic keratosis: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized, prospective, comparative trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Aug;29(8):1598-605. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12953. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
PMID: 25640401BACKGROUNDHaedersdal M, Sakamoto FH, Farinelli WA, Doukas AG, Tam J, Anderson RR. Fractional CO(2) laser-assisted drug delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):113-22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20860.
PMID: 20166154BACKGROUNDManstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20048.
PMID: 15216537BACKGROUNDChen KH, Tam KW, Chen IF, Huang SK, Tzeng PC, Wang HJ, Chen CC. A systematic review of comparative studies of CO2 and erbium:YAG lasers in resurfacing facial rhytides (wrinkles). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017 Aug;19(4):199-204. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2017.1288261. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
PMID: 28166434BACKGROUNDRoss EV, Swann M, Soon S, Izadpanah A, Barnette D, Davenport S. Full-face treatments with the 2790-nm erbium:YSGG laser system. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Mar;8(3):248-52.
PMID: 19271372BACKGROUNDWeinstein C. Erbium laser resurfacing: current concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Feb;103(2):602-16; discussion 617-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00038.
PMID: 9950553BACKGROUNDWang-Evers M, Blazon-Brown AJ, Ha-Wissel L, Arkhipova V, Paithankar D, Yaroslavsky IV, Altshuler G, Manstein D. Assessment of a 3050/3200 nm fiber laser system for ablative fractional laser treatments in dermatology. Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Aug;54(6):851-860. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23550. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
PMID: 35395696BACKGROUNDLv K, Liu H, Xu H, Wang C, Zhu S, Lou X, Luo P, Xiao S, Xia Z. Ablative fractional CO2 laser surgery improving sleep quality, pain and pruritus in adult hypertrophic scar patients: a prospective cohort study. Burns Trauma. 2021 Jul 27;9:tkab023. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab023. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34322556BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2024
First Posted
March 6, 2024
Study Start
October 16, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.