Effect of Limb Length Ratio on Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Outcomes (CLIMB II Study)
CLIMBII
1 other identifier
interventional
262
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial comparing BP and roux limb lengths measuring 30 and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length versus current standard practice using fixed lengths. The findings would provide further insight into feasibility of standardizing RYGB limb lengths and optimizing resultant weight loss and metabolic effects. The investigators hypothesize RYGB with ratio-adjusted limb lengths (aRYGB) will result in higher total weight loss and resolution of metabolic syndrome comorbidities, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension compared to standard fixed-length RYGB (sRYGB). The study will also utilize the Short Form Rand 36-Item Health Survey (SF36) to determine differences in postoperative quality of life metrics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 11, 2030
March 20, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.9 years
February 19, 2024
March 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine change in TWL after aRYGB compared to sRYGB in morbidly obese patients
Measured in kilograms
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
To compare rates of DM resolution between aRYGB Vs sRYGB by DM subgroup analysis
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
To investigate postoperative efficacy rates of aRYGB compared to sRYGB on alleviating metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
To investigate the presence of postoperative vitamin and nutritional deficiencies between the groups.
6,12,24 and 60 months from surgery
Study Arms (2)
aRYGB
EXPERIMENTALBP and roux limb lengths measuring 30% and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length.
sRYGB
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard fixed-length RYGB
Interventions
Biliopancreatic limb and roux limb lengths measuring 30 and 15% respectively of patient's total small bowel length in RYGB
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- morbidly obese patients (defined by BMI between 40 and 60).
- Patient who understands and accepts the need for a long-term follow-up.
- Patient who agrees to be included in the study
You may not qualify if:
- individuals unable to understand and sign a written consent form
- patients with history of previous bariatric surgery procedures
- presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology unrelated to obesity
- previous gastric or small bowel resection
- active cancer
- pregnancy or desired to be pregnant during the study
- mentally unbalanced patients under supervision or guardianship, patient unable to give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Salvador Navarrete, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2024
First Posted
March 5, 2024
Study Start
January 12, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 11, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 11, 2030
Last Updated
March 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03