Annual Wellness Visits vs GRACE-augmented Annual Wellness Visits For Older Adults With High Needs - Phase 1
SPIRE1
Supporting Practices In Respecting Elders Phase 1
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study consists of three aims focused on examining the feasibility of adding the Geriatric Resources and Assessment for the Care of Elders (GRACE) model to structured Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) to improve patient and caregiver outcomes and reduce hospitalizations in older adults with complex health needs. The objectives are to:
- 1.Co-design a community-centric implementation strategy for the AWVs vs AWVs + GRACE -augmented care (AWV GRACE) study arms
- 2.Develop a referral pathway and algorithm to optimize enrollment of eligible participants
- 3.Conduct a pilot clinical trial to assess the feasibility of the AWV GRACE intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 18, 2025
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
May 1, 2025
11 months
February 13, 2024
January 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Hospitalizations
Rate of inpatient hospitalizations evaluated at the participant level
Up to 12 months prior to intervention vs 6 months after intervention
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) with Patient Centered Medical Home 1.0 supplement (PCMH CAHPS)
The CAHPS Clinician \& Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) asks patients to report on their experiences with providers and staff in primary care and specialty care settings, using a 6 month recall period. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Item Set is a set of supplemental questions that is added to the adult version of the CAHPS Clinician \& Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) to gather more information on patient experience with the domains of primary care that define a medical home. Scoring for most items is on a 4 point scale 1=never 2=sometimes 3=usually 4=Always. Minimum and Maximum scores vary with the number of items used. The Provider Rating item is on a 11 point scale from 0 to 10,where 9,10 are considered "high" scores.
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Net Promotor Score
The single question - "How likely are you to recommend X to a friend \[or colleague\]?" is rated from 0 - Not at all likely to 10 - Extremely likely.
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health - Physical Health (PH) and Mental Health (MH)
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Caregiver Strain
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Patient's out-of-pocket costs for up to 180 days after enrollment
Up to 6 months after enrollment
Caregiver's hours spent caregiving.
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Pilot ACOs Staffing costs
At the completion of the pilot phase
Other Outcomes (12)
Exploratory Geriatric Outcomes - Number of participants with new ICD-10 diagnosis codes
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Exploratory Geriatric Outcomes- number of participants that complete advanced care planning documents
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
Exploratory Geriatric Outcomes - number of participants with inappropriate medications
Within 1 month of intervention and 6 months after intervention
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Annual Wellness Visits (AWV)
EXPERIMENTALRandomized Vanderbilt Health Affiliated Network (VHAN) practice to AWV and assess impact on the population deemed by study algorithm as high-risk and recruit 50 participants from the VHAN primary care clinical practice (n=50/practice) to complete surveys prior to the intervention and 6 months later.
Annual Wellness Visits + Geriatric Resources and Assessment for the Care of Elders (AWV + GRACE)
EXPERIMENTALRandomized Vanderbilt Health Affiliated Network (VHAN) practice to AWV + GRACE and assess impact on the population deemed by study algorithm as high-risk and recruit 50 participants from the VHAN primary care clinical practice (n=50/practice) to complete surveys prior to the intervention and 6 months later.
Interventions
Completion of a structured Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) questionnaire administered by an assigned practice staff member for Medicare beneficiaries deemed by study algorithm as high-risk. Those responses will then be used by the primary care team to place any needed referrals and offer any indicated personal health advice and create a care plan for the coming year. Routine usual care from the primary care practice will occur.
The practice will initiate the Geriatric Resources and Assessment for the Care of Elders (GRACE) program for Medicare beneficiaries deemed by study algorithm as high-risk and meeting other study criteria (see below). After completion of the in-home structured annual wellness visit (AWV) and GRACE assessment by the NP/SW team, responses will be reviewed and applied to construct an individualized care plan using the GRACE protocols inclusive of advance care planning, health maintenance, medication management, assistance with any difficulty walking, falls, dementia, depression, chronic pain, malnutrition, weight loss, urinary incontinence, visual impairment, hearing impairment, or caregiver burden.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be 65 years of age or older
- be eligible for an AWV during the study period
- have a residential mailing address within a 45-mile radius of the Vanderbilt clinics
- have a working home/mobile telephone number where they can be reached
- be English or Spanish speaking
- be able to provide consent and /or have a proxy able to consent to study participation
You may not qualify if:
- are receiving hospice care
- are currently housed at Long Term Care Facilities
- are incarcerated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Brandeis Universitycollaborator
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centercollaborator
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centercollaborator
- Indiana Universitycollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Related Publications (23)
Conwell LJ, Cohen JW. Characteristics of Persons with High Medical Expenditures in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 2002. Published online 2002:6.
BACKGROUNDFeder JL. Predictive modeling and team care for high-need patients at HealthCare Partners. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):416-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0080. No abstract available.
PMID: 21383355BACKGROUNDWeiss KB. Managing complexity in chronic care: an overview of the VA state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0379-x.
PMID: 18026804BACKGROUNDGrant RW, Ashburner JM, Hong CS, Chang Y, Barry MJ, Atlas SJ. Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):797-804. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00001.
PMID: 22184686BACKGROUNDHigh-Need, High-Cost Patients: Who Are They and How Do They Use Health Care? | Commonwealth Fund. Accessed September 3, 2019. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2016/aug/high-need-high-cost-patients-who-are-they-and-how-do-they-use
BACKGROUNDShafir A, Garrigues SK, Schenker Y, Leff B, Neil J, Ritchie C. Homebound Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Quality of Care in Home-Based Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1622-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14244. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
PMID: 27384919BACKGROUNDSayer C. "Time Spent at Home" - A Patient-Defined Outcome. NEJM Catalyst. Published online April 26, 2016. Accessed December 21, 2022. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/CAT.16.0854
BACKGROUNDMcNabney MK, Green AR, Burke M, Le ST, Butler D, Chun AK, Elliott DP, Fulton AT, Hyer K, Setters B, Shega JW. Complexities of care: Common components of models of care in geriatrics. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):1960-1972. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17811. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
PMID: 35485287BACKGROUNDAuerbach DI, Levy DE, Maramaldi P, Dittus RS, Spetz J, Buerhaus PI, Donelan K. Optimal Staffing Models To Care For Frail Older Adults In Primary Care And Geriatrics Practices In The US. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Sep;40(9):1368-1376. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00401.
PMID: 34495726BACKGROUNDAccountable Care Organizations (ACOs) | CMS. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ACO
BACKGROUNDFraze TK, Beidler LB, Briggs ADM, Colla CH. Translating Evidence into Practice: ACOs' Use of Care Plans for Patients with Complex Health Needs. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06122-4. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
PMID: 33006083BACKGROUNDOchieng N, Damico A, 2023. Medicare Advantage in 2023: Enrollment Update and Key Trends. KFF. Published August 9, 2023. Accessed August 17, 2023. https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-advantage-in-2023-enrollment-update-and-key-trends/
BACKGROUNDMLN6775421 - Medicare Wellness Visits. Accessed December 21, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/preventive-services/medicare-wellness-visits.html
BACKGROUNDHuang H, Zhu X, Wehby GL. Primary care physicians' participation in the Medicare shared savings program and preventive services delivery: Evidence from the first 7 years. Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1182-1190. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14030. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
PMID: 35808929BACKGROUNDLind KE, Hildreth KL, Perraillon MC. Persistent Disparities in Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit Utilization. Med Care. 2019 Dec;57(12):984-989. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001229.
PMID: 31584462BACKGROUNDBeckman AL, Becerra AZ, Marcus A, DuBard CA, Lynch K, Maxson E, Mostashari F, King J. Medicare Annual Wellness Visit association with healthcare quality and costs. Am J Manag Care. 2019 Mar 1;25(3):e76-e82.
PMID: 30875175BACKGROUNDCounsell SR, Callahan CM, Buttar AB, Clark DO, Frank KI. Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (GRACE): a new model of primary care for low-income seniors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jul;54(7):1136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00791.x.
PMID: 16866688BACKGROUNDRodriguez, S, Munevar, D, Delaney, C, Yang, L, Tumlinson, A. Effective Management of High-Risk Medicare Populations. Published online September 2014.
BACKGROUNDCounsell SR, Callahan CM, Tu W, Stump TE, Arling GW. Cost analysis of the Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders care management intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1420-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02383.x.
PMID: 19691149BACKGROUNDCounsell SR, Callahan CM, Clark DO, Tu W, Buttar AB, Stump TE, Ricketts GD. Geriatric care management for low-income seniors: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2623-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2623.
PMID: 18073358BACKGROUNDElixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.
PMID: 9431328BACKGROUNDBoult C, Dowd B, McCaffrey D, Boult L, Hernandez R, Krulewitch H. Screening elders for risk of hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Aug;41(8):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06175.x.
PMID: 8340558BACKGROUNDTravison TG, Pham E, Donelan K, Bartels SJ, Carter JA, Corelli K, Counsell SR, Crean M, Flaherty E, Michael C, Moran DS, Murff HJ, Perloff J, Ritchie CS. Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a pragmatic pilot and full-scale trial to improve care for older adults with complex care needs: The SPIRE study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Dec;159:108072. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.108072. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
PMID: 40907942DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor team will be blinded to the intervention assignments of participants. Due to the nature of the intervention, the participants, the investigator, and the care providers are unable to be blinded to the participant assignments.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2024
First Posted
March 1, 2024
Study Start
August 29, 2024
Primary Completion
July 18, 2025
Study Completion
July 18, 2025
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will become available upon request after academic journal publication.
- Access Criteria
- Access criteria will be determined and confirmed by the corresponding author upon review of the formal data request.
The data can be available by request only after academic journal publication. Any formal requests should be sent by external research teams and will be reviewed by the corresponding author.