NCT06285773

Brief Summary

In cardiac surgeries performed with median sternotomy, mediastinal and thoracic tube placement sites are outside the area of effect of parasternal blocks, and sometimes the sternotomy incision extends below the T6 dermatome. Recto intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) has been defined as a complementary block for analgesia of this region. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block and pectointercostal fascial block for postoperative analgesia management after open heart surgery (coronary artery bypass) with median sternotomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 10, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 29, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 10, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiac surgeryPostoperative analgesia managementRecto-intercostal fascial plane blockPecto-intercostal fascial plane block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain scores (Numerical rating scale) (0-meaning "no pain" to 10-meaning "worst pain imaginable")

    Change from Baseline Pain Scores at Postoperative 24 hours. Global QoR-15 Total: 150 (max) Physical Comfort 50 (max) Emotional State 40 (max) Psychological Support 20 (max) Physical Independence 20 (max) Pain 20 (max)

    Postoperative 24 hours period

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Global recovery scoring system / Quality of Recovery 15 questionairre

    Change from baseline score at postoperative 24 hour

  • The use of rescue analgesia

    Postoperative 24 hours period

  • The use of rescue analgesia

    Postoperative 24 hours period

Study Arms (2)

Group PR = RIFPB and PIFB group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) and Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) will be applied

Drug: RIFPB blockOther: Postoperative analgesia managementDrug: PIFPB block

Group Control

OTHER

No block will be applied.

Other: Postoperative analgesia management

Interventions

For RIFPB, a local anesthetic will be injected into the plane between the costal cartilage and the rectus abdominis muscle at the 6th-7th costal cartilage under US guidance. The in-plane technique will be used. After confirming the block location, 10 ml of 0.25% concentration marcaine (bupivacaine) will be used (bilateral).

Group PR = RIFPB and PIFB group

Patients will be administered 10mg/kg paracetamol in the postoperative period every eight hours. If the NRS score is ≥ 4, 1 mg kg-1 iv tramadol will be administered as a rescue analgesic.

Group ControlGroup PR = RIFPB and PIFB group

For PIFPB; the ultrasound probe for PIFB is placed 2-3 cm lateral to the upper third of the sternum, parallel to the sternum. A local anesthetic of 15 ml of 0.25% concentration of marcaine (bupivacaine) will be used between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscles (bilateral).

Group PR = RIFPB and PIFB group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III
  • Scheduled for cardiac surgery with elective median sternotomy under general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • a personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia,
  • opioid sensitivity,
  • alcohol or drug addiction,
  • liver or kidney disease,
  • skin infection in the area to be blocked,
  • thoracic deformity,
  • patients who are allergic to their medications,
  • patients who do not agree to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Zhang Y, Gong H, Zhan B, Chen S. Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01391-w.

    PMID: 34157970BACKGROUND
  • Khera T, Murugappan KR, Leibowitz A, Bareli N, Shankar P, Gilleland S, Wilson K, Oren-Grinberg A, Novack V, Venkatachalam S, Rangasamy V, Subramaniam B. Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Mar;35(3):896-903. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.058. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

    PMID: 32798172BACKGROUND
  • Elbardan IM, Shehab AS, Mabrouk IM. Comparison of Transversus Thoracis Muscle Plane Block and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block for enhanced recovery after pediatric open-heart surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Aug;42(4):101230. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101230. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

    PMID: 37031816BACKGROUND
  • Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Alver S, Sakul BU, Ansen G, Pence KB, Alici HA. Recto-intercostal fascial plane block: Another novel fascial plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111163. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111163. Epub 2023 Jun 7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37295124BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcomes Assessor and participant were blinded to the study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Sixty patients aged 18-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II and scheduled for open heart surgery (coronary artery bypass) with median sternotomy will be included in the study. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups (Group PR = PIFPB + RIFPB group, Group C = Control group) including 30 patients each, before entering the operating room.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2024

First Posted

February 29, 2024

Study Start

February 10, 2024

Primary Completion

April 10, 2025

Study Completion

April 20, 2025

Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared

Locations