PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF HEARTFOCUS
HF-01
1 other identifier
interventional
240
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The study's objective is to evaluate if exams, performed with the HeartFocus software by novices, are of sufficient quality to visually analyze the left ventricular size, the left ventricular function, the right ventricular size, and the presence of non-trivial pericardial effusion. Novices will be nurses without prior ultrasound experience who have received dedicated training on cardiac ultrasound and on Heartfocus software. Ultrasound exams will be limited to the acquisition of 10 reference views
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 16, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 29, 2026
CompletedJanuary 29, 2026
January 1, 2026
9 months
May 5, 2023
October 13, 2025
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The Left Ventricular Size (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
For each participant, one novice and one expert performed a limited echocardiographic exam on the same patient, so that the quality of each exam could be evaluated by cardiologists. Blinded cardiologists evaluated whether the exam had sufficient image quality to allow visual analysis of left ventricular size. Each exam was independently reviewed by five cardiologists. If at least three cardiologists rated the exam as "Yes" (sufficient quality), the exam was classified as having sufficient image quality; if at least three rated it as "No", the exam was classified as not sufficient. The results represent the percentage of scans evaluated as having sufficient image quality.
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Left Ventricular Function (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
For each participant, one novice and one expert performed a limited echocardiographic exam on the same patient, so that the quality of each exam could be evaluated by cardiologists. Blinded cardiologists evaluated whether the ultrasound examination had sufficient image quality to allow visual analysis of left ventricular function. Each exam was independently reviewed by five cardiologists. If at least three cardiologists rated the exam as "Yes" (sufficient quality), the exam was classified as having sufficient image quality; if at least three rated it as "No", the exam was classified as not sufficient. The results represent the percentage of scans evaluated as having sufficient image quality.
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Right Ventricle Size (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
For each participant, one novice and one expert performed a limited echocardiographic exam on the same patient, so that the quality of each exam could be evaluated by cardiologists. Blinded cardiologists evaluated whether the ultrasound examination had sufficient image quality to allow visual analysis of right ventricular size. Each exam was independently reviewed by five cardiologists. If at least three cardiologists rated the exam as "Yes" (sufficient quality), the exam was classified as having sufficient image quality; if at least three rated it as "No", the exam was classified as not sufficient. The results represent the percentage of scans evaluated as having sufficient image quality.
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Presence of Non-trivial Pericardial Effusion (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
For each participant, one novice and one expert performed a limited echocardiographic exam on the same patient, so that the quality of each exam could be evaluated by cardiologists. Blinded cardiologists evaluated whether the ultrasound exam had sufficient image quality to visually analyze the presence of non-trivial pericardial effusion. Each exam was independently reviewed by five cardiologists. If at least three cardiologists rated the exam as 'Yes' (sufficient quality), the exam was classified as having sufficient image quality; if at least three rated it as 'No', the exam was classified as not sufficient. The results represent the percentage of scans evaluated as having sufficient image quality.
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
Secondary Outcomes (18)
The Function of the Right Ventricle (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Left Atrium Size (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Right Atrium Size (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Segmental Kinetics of the Left Ventricle (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
The Aortic Valve (Qualitative Visual Assessment)
Images evaluated by the cardiologists after the acquisition
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Study participants
EXPERIMENTAL240 patients will be included, 120 in Site 01 (Bordeaux) and 120 in Site 02 (New York)
Interventions
The novice are nurses without prior ultrasound experience performed limited echocardiograms using the HeartFocus AI-based guidance software (DESKi). After a half-day training and practice on ≤9 patients, each novice acquired echocardiographic clips for 10 standard transthoracic views with the assistance of real-time software guidance and automated recording.
Experienced sonographers and cardiologists performed limited echocardiograms using HeartFocus software, without AI assistance. The experts acquired echocardiographic sequences corresponding to the 10 standard transthoracic views, just like the novices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient (male or female) over 18 years old, Patient having an echocardiography examination scheduled in one of the two investigation centers.
- Patient who has given his non-objection to participate in the research
You may not qualify if:
- Patient subject to a measure of legal protection (safeguard of justice, guardianship or curatorship), Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, Patient being unable to give his non-objection, Pregnant or breastfeeding women, Patient with cardiac anatomy that does not allow reference electrocardiographic sections to be made (situs inversus, single ventricle, congenital anomalies, etc), Patient having benefited from prior echocardiographic exams whose reports mention poor or weak echogenicity, Patient having known chest deformity that has already been mentioned in previous reports or has been the subject of investigations (pectum excavatum), Patient who has undergone total or partial pneumectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- DESKilead
Study Sites (2)
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, 10075, United States
University Hospital of Bordeaux
Bordeaux, Aquitaine, 33000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Clinical Operations
- Organization
- DESKi
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Biana Trost, MD, FACC, FASE
Department of Cardiology Lenox Hill Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2023
First Posted
May 24, 2023
Study Start
November 13, 2023
Primary Completion
August 16, 2024
Study Completion
August 16, 2024
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Results First Posted
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share