Acupuncture of Different Treatment Frequency in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain, typically characterized by a sharp pain in the plantar aponeurosis, specifically near the insertion site close to the medial process of the calcaneal tuberosity. It has been reported that 1 in 10 people are expected to be affected by PF in their lifetime. A comprehensive internet-panel survey conducted among the adult United States population revealed the population-based prevalence of self-reported PF with pain in the last month was 0.85 percent. Approximately 1 million patients are diagnosed with this disease each year in the United States. PF was believed to be an acute inflammatory disease, but patient samples show it is actually a chronic degenerative process caused by various factors such as repetitive stresses, vascular and metabolic disorders, excess free radicals, high temperatures, genetic factors, and conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. PF may be associated with impaired health-related quality of life, including reduced life functioning, poor perceived health status and social isolation. Additionally, a recent study indicates that the annual cost associated with PF is $284 million. The first-line treatments recommended by guidelines for PF encompass physical therapy (including manual therapy, stretching, and others), pharmacological therapy (involving corticosteroids or platelet-rich plasma), and surgical treatment. However, the definite effects of physical therapy still require confirmation. Pharmacological treatments, such as local corticosteroid injections, exhibit a short maintenance period. Some studies indicate that the relief provided by corticosteroid injections lasts up to one month, yet its efficacy diminishes after 6 months. Surgical treatment is generally advised 6 to 12 months after unsuccessful conservative treatment, albeit with the drawback of higher costs, post-surgery recovery time, and patient apprehension. Acupuncture is one of the most common complementary alternative therapy for the treatment of pain-related diseases such as musculoskeletal muscle, and recent guidelines recommend dry needling as a treatment for relief of plantar fasciitis, with a level of evidence of B. Dry acupuncture is different from acupuncture in terms of theoretical basis, therapeutic apparatus, technical operation and scope of indications, however, the American Alliance for Professional Acupuncture Safety also believes that dry needling falls under the umbrella of acupuncture, but under a different name. In addition, there are systematic evaluations that suggest acupuncture can be a safe and effective treatment for PF, and most of the trials in the systematic evaluations used 4-week treatment courses. Our prior study demonstrated that a 4-week intervention of both electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture resulted in improved pain outcomes among patients with PF. The frequency of acupuncture stands as a crucial factor influencing its efficacy. A study revealed that needling trials with negative results had a significantly lower frequency compared to those yielding positive results. Furthermore, several studies indicate that acupuncture once a week can be help in conditions such as simple obesity, functional dyspepsia, and overactive bladder in women. There is no universally accepted standard of frequency of treatment for many conditions, including PF. In China, patients with chronic diseases usually receive 3-5 acupuncture treatments per week. However, in most previous trials, individuals with chronic diseases received 1-2 needling sessions per week. An increase in the frequency of acupuncture means an increase in the pain, time, and financial investment associated with the acupuncture process. Therefore, it is critical to optimize the frequency of acupuncture to ensure the effectiveness and feasibility of the treatment while avoiding increasing the burden on the patient. Accordingly, the investigators designed the current trial to compare the effects of different acupuncture sessions (1 session per week versus 3 sessions per week) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of chronic PF. The hypothesis is that 1 session per week compared with 3 sessions per week of electroacupuncture treatment over a total of 4 weeks of treatment will provide a similar effect on pain relief in chronic PF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
July 16, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.4 years
February 17, 2024
July 13, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The response rate
Defined as a minimum of 50% improvement in the worst pain intensity during the first morning steps compared with the baseline. This trial will be analyzed using the mean of the worst pain level VAS from the previous three days. Pain intensity will be measured using a 0-100 VAS, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating maximal pain. Participants who must resort to additional treatments other than the permitted rescue medication will be classified as non-responders.
At the end of weeks 4
Secondary Outcomes (8)
The response rate
At the end of weeks 8, and 16
Change from baseline in the VAS score for worst pain intensity during the first morning steps
At the end of weeks 4, 8, and 16
Change from baseline in the VAS score for mean pain intensity during the day
At the end of weeks 4, 8, and 16
Change from baseline in the duration of heel pain during the day
At the end of weeks 4, 8, and 16
Change from baseline in heel pressure pain threshold (PPT)
At the end of weeks 4, 8, and 16
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Participants' expectation towards acupuncture
At baseline
Safety assessment
During weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 and weeks 9-16
Adherence assessment
Weeks 1-4
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
The more frequent acupuncture treatment group (Group M)
EXPERIMENTALThe more frequent acupuncture treatment group (Group M)
The less frequent acupuncture treatment group (Group L)
EXPERIMENTALThe less frequent acupuncture treatment group (Group L)
Interventions
With the patient in a prone position, the local skin will be routinely sterilized, Ashi points will be perpendicularly inserted into the plantar fascia layer with a depth of approximately 15-20 mm depending on the location. BL57, KI3, and BL60 will be punched perpendicularly 10-15 mm deep into the skin. All needles except the Ashi points will be manually stimulated with small, equal manipulations of lifting, thrusting, twirling, and rotating to achieve De qi (a sensation including soreness, numbness, distention, and heaviness), and the practitioner has a feeling of needle sinking and tightness. The electroacupuncture instrument is connected to the needle handle of BL57 and BL60 respectively. During the needle retention period, except for BL57 and BL60, which are connected to the electroacupuncture instrument, Ashi points and KI3 perform a small and uniform twisting technique three times every 10 min, and a total of 3 times within 30min.
The intervention is the same as Group M except that the frequency of acupuncture will be once per week acupuncture. During the treatment period, in addition to acupuncture, patients will be visited twice a week for a total of 8 visits by telephone or in person. If the content of the visit aligns with the established efficacy evaluation visit in the program, it will be carried out as planned. If not, the patient will be inquired about the progress of their condition since the previous treatment, any rescue medication taken, and other relevant information. Visits that do not involve improvement in relevant indicators of study concern do not need to be recorded. The electroacupuncture will last for 30 min and will be performed three sessions per week or one session per week for a total of 12 or 4 sessions in four consecutive weeks. Participants in both groups will be treated and (or) evaluated separately.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a diagnosis of chronic PF with a disease course of ≥ 6 months;
- The most painful heel pain in the morning is Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating maximal pain) ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS;
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years;
- Patients should be conscious, free from mental disorders, and without serious heart, liver, or kidney diseases; and
- Willing to sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- History of calcaneal tuberosity fracture/calcaneal stress fracture/calcaneal contusion/plantar fascia rupture;
- History of ankle or foot surgery;
- Achilles tendon enthesis lesion/tarsal tunnel syndrome/medial calcaneal nerve entrapment/nerve injury;
- Systemic or local infection, severe cracked heel, foot deformity (e.g., high arched feet, flat feet, foot valgus);
- Systemic diseases (e.g., obligatory spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative arthritis, autoimmune system diseases, tumors, diabetes ) and other situations judged by the investigators not to be suitable for the clinical trial;
- Pregnant women; patients with severe combined cardiac, hepatic, renal, hematopoietic, and patients with cardiac pacemakers , and patients with severe poor general nutritional status;
- Cognitive impairment, inability to understand the content of the scale evaluation;
- Topical steroid injection or oral use in the past 6 months;
- Patients with a known fear of acupuncture or who have been treated with acupuncture in the past 8 weeks.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital
Beijing, China
Related Publications (1)
Shi J, Jiao R, Liu Y, Liu X, Sun Y, Shi H, Gao N, Liu Z, Liang J, Wang W. Comparing different session regimens of electroacupuncture for chronic plantar fasciitis: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Aug 24;41:101355. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101355. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PMID: 39280785DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Weiming Wang, Ph.D
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2024
First Posted
February 29, 2024
Study Start
May 21, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- It depends
- Access Criteria
- It depends
Individual participant data are available on reasonable request. You can send e-mail to us if you have any question