NCT06280170

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI) platform for case managers in a nonprofit health system specializing in mental health and substance use disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Is the AI platform acceptable and feasible for case managers?
  2. 2.Does the AI platform improve providers' productivity and reported interventions? Participants will be approximately 30 case managers and their 250 adult clients receiving case management services. Researchers will compare the provider productivity and work satisfaction prior to the implementation of the AI platform to following its implementation.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
280

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 30, 2024

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 19, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Case managementArtificial IntelligenceProvider productivityMental health servicesProvider satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Case manager satisfaction

    Providers will complete a self-report assessment about their experience providing case management services. Providers will be asked to (a) report the number of of hours spent on documentation per week; (b) respond on a Likert Scale (1-5, 1="Not at all" and 5="highly stressed" regarding their stress level about documentation; and (c) respond on a Likert scale 1-5 (1="Not at all satisfied", 5="Highly satisfied"), indicating their satisfaction with their current role as a case manager.

    Baseline, and 4 months after the rollout of the Eleos Health tool.

  • Case manager productivity

    We will collect the number of encounters (i.e., case management visits provided) per month in the three months preceding the start of the study, and months 3-6 after the AI platform rollout.

    3 months before and 3 month after study start date

  • Case manager note completion time

    We will record progress note completion time by hours since the time of service delivery (average, standard deviation, and range).

    3 months before and 3 month after study start date

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Clients' crisis services utilization

    6 months before and 6 month after study start date

Study Arms (2)

Services-as-usual (SAU)

NO INTERVENTION

During the services-as-usual (SAU) phase of this study, providers will deliver the routine case management services offered by Centerstone and report these services in the usual way they do.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

EXPERIMENTAL

Once randomized to start using the AI-based platform for documenting their services, providers will have access to the Eleos Health platform, a secure and HIPAA-compliant tool specifically designed for documenting behavioral health encounters. This AI-powered platform enables providers to complete progress notes more quickly. Providers will complete the progress notes on their phones, and these notes will be integrated into the client's electronic health records.

Other: Artificial Intelligence platform for case managers

Interventions

Providers will have access to the Eleos Health mobile AI platform to document their case management encounters.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be adults.
  • Participants must be receiving case management services from a Centerstone provider

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants currently involved in any other concurrent research study will be excluded to avoid potential confounding factors.
  • Participants with any medical conditions or medications that may significantly interfere with the study outcomes will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centerstone

Alton, Illinois, 62002, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Kellogg KC, Sadeh-Sharvit S. Pragmatic AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: Key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 6;13:990370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.990370. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 36147984BACKGROUND
  • Sadeh-Sharvit S, Hollon SD. Leveraging the Power of Nondisruptive Technologies to Optimize Mental Health Treatment: Case Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Nov 26;7(11):e20646. doi: 10.2196/20646.

    PMID: 33242025BACKGROUND
  • Sadeh-Sharvit S, Camp TD, Horton SE, Hefner JD, Berry JM, Grossman E, Hollon SD. Effects of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Behavioral Interventions on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 10;25:e46781. doi: 10.2196/46781.

    PMID: 37428547BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive DisorderAnxiety DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Interventions

Case Managers

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mood DisordersMental DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersStress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health PersonnelHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The masking in this study involves a differential approach between providers and clients. Providers will be aware of whether they are in the Services-As-Usual (SAU) or Artificial Intelligence (AI) phase. However, participating clients will not be informed about the platform their provider is using to document their therapy sessions.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This study will follow a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled design, where each provider team will undergo two phases: SAU and the AI platform phase. All teams will initially start with SAU, and the AI platform will be sequentially introduced to teams over time. Teams will be randomly assigned to different time periods for the AI platform phase using simple randomization. The order of implementation will be determined by randomly selecting the number of the team from sealed envelopes every two months. In both phases, the study will enroll new and existing clients. At the end of the trial all teams would have used Eleos for a few months
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2024

First Posted

February 28, 2024

Study Start

February 19, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The confidentiality and privacy of the participants' data are paramount, and sharing individual-level data could compromise their privacy. Therefore, the study does not include provisions for sharing IPD with other researchers.

Locations