NCT06279598

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to increase understanding of the effectiveness and efficiency of psychological treatment for adult patients with posttraumatic stress disorder -PTSD- and to make it more personalized. Key questions:

  • Investigating the extent to which therapist allegiance to a specific therapy method affects outcomes;
  • Investigating whether the quality of therapy implementation or the treatment integrity ('adherence/ competence') affects treatment outcomes;
  • Investigating how much the quality of the therapeutic alliance influences outcomes. Participants receive treatment and will complete questionnaires. The study is conducted in two phases. Its aim is to compare two different trauma-focused treatments (EMDR and PE) for patients with PTSD to one another and with a nontrauma-focused psychotherapy (IPT) and to investigate possible predictors and moderators for treatment success. Patients will first be randomized to PE or EMDR in the first treatment phase. After this first phase, non-responders are re-randomized for a second phase of treatment. They receive either the alternative phase 1 trauma-focused psychotherapy or IPT as non-trauma-focused therapy. In phase 1 researchers will compare the PE and EMDR group to see which treatment is most effective for whom. In phase 2 researchers will compare the trauma-focused treatments (PE and EMDR group) with the nontrauma-focused treatment (IPT group) to see which treatment is most effective for whom.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
442

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
77mo left

Started Jan 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress27%
Jan 2024Aug 2032

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2024

Completed
7.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 20, 2031

Expected
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2032

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7.4 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

PsychotherapyTraumaProlonged ExposureEye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingInterpersonal PsychotherapyTrauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)

    The primary outcome measure for the effectiveness of the treatment in both phases is symptom reduction (less burden of PTSD symptoms) measured with the PTSD checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5). The Dutch version of the PCL-5 will be used, the PCL-5 is administered at baseline and repeated weekly. The PCL-5 is a self-report questionnaire of 20 items about the DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. This measure will be used to monitor symptom change during and after treatment in both phases of the study.

    Measured every week for 8 weeks in phase 1 and measured every week of 8 weeks in phase 2 of the study.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5)

    Measured at baseline, at the end of treatment in phase 1 (= after 8 weeks) and at the end of the treatment in phase 2 (= after 16 weeks = end of the study).

  • International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)

    Measured at baseline, at the end of treatment in phase 1 (= after 8 weeks) and at the end of the treatment in phase 2 (= after 16 weeks = end of the study).

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Measured every week for 8 weeks in phase 1 and measured every week of 8 weeks in phase 2 of the study.

  • Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)

    Measured at baseline, at the end of treatment in phase 1 (= after 8 weeks) and at the end of the treatment in phase 2 (= after 16 weeks = end of the study).

  • Positive and Negative Experiences of Psychotherapy questionnaire (PNEP)

    Measured at baseline, at the end of treatment in phase 1 (= after 8 weeks) and at the end of the treatment in phase 2 (= after 16 weeks = end of the study).

Other Outcomes (20)

  • Age

    Measured at baseline.

  • Gender

    Measured at baseline.

  • Education

    Measured at baseline.

  • +17 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Prolonged Exposure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention: Prolonged Exposure therapy, 14 sessions of 60 minutes in 8 weeks.

Behavioral: Prolonged Exposure therapy

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention: Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR), 14 sessions of 60 minutes in 8 weeks.

Behavioral: Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR)

Interpersonal Psychotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), 14 sessions of 60 minutes in 8 weeks. In phase 2 of the study for treatment non-responders, IPT is studied as an alternative switching option compared to the switch of the aforementioned trauma-focused forms of psychotherapy.

Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT)

Interventions

This concerns a form of psychotherapy for PTSD.

Also known as: Trauma-focused CBT
Prolonged Exposure

This concerns a form of psychotherapy for PTSD.

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing

This concerns a form of psychotherapy for PTSD.

Interpersonal Psychotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults between the ages of 18 and 65 who were classified with a primary diagnosis of PTSD (based on the DSM-5 criteria).
  • Adults who are willing to participate in the study (informed consent)

You may not qualify if:

  • Insufficient proficiency in the Dutch language.
  • Patients who cannot follow the treatment protocol (for example due to prolonged absence) are excluded from the study.
  • Patients who use medication that is not stable. If properly set to the last prescribed medication by the doctor there will be advised to continue and referably not change the medication and its dose during treatment, unless necessary in connection with side effects, crisis, etc.
  • Patients that already received an evidence-based form of trauma-oriented treatment for PTSD in the past year and for sufficient treatment duration, in accordance to the Dutch professional practice guidelines (reference: Akwa GGZ (2020, December 1). GGZ Standaarden. Psychotrauma- en stressorgerelateerde stoornissen. Retrieved September 29, 2022, from https://www.ggzstandaarden.nl/zorgstandaarden/psychotrauma-en-stressorgerelateerde-stoornissen/introductie).
  • Patients with serious suicidality that requires acute intervention and structural addition of additional treatment interventions.
  • Patients with an intellectual disability.
  • Patients with a serious addiction as a comorbid problem.
  • Patients with an acute mania or a psychotic state.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dimence

Deventer, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Related Publications (31)

  • Boeschoten MA, Van der Aa N, Bakker A, Ter Heide FJJ, Hoofwijk MC, Jongedijk RA, Van Minnen A, Elzinga BM, Olff M. Development and Evaluation of the Dutch Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Nov 22;9(1):1546085. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1546085. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30510643BACKGROUND
  • Loerinc AG, Meuret AE, Twohig MP, Rosenfield D, Bluett EJ, Craske MG. Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

    PMID: 26319194BACKGROUND
  • Mavranezouli I, Megnin-Viggars O, Daly C, Dias S, Welton NJ, Stockton S, Bhutani G, Grey N, Leach J, Greenberg N, Katona C, El-Leithy S, Pilling S. Psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2020 Mar;50(4):542-555. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000070. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

    PMID: 32063234BACKGROUND
  • Coventry PA, Meader N, Melton H, Temple M, Dale H, Wright K, Cloitre M, Karatzias T, Bisson J, Roberts NP, Brown JVE, Barbui C, Churchill R, Lovell K, McMillan D, Gilbody S. Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.

    PMID: 32813696BACKGROUND
  • Markowitz, J. C. (2021). Interpersoonlijke psychotherapie bij posttraumatische stressstoornis: Een nieuwe vorm van traumabehandeling (1e druk). Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bleiberg KL, Markowitz JC. Interpersonal Psychotherapy for PTSD: Treating Trauma without Exposure. J Psychother Integr. 2019 Mar;29(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/int0000113.

    PMID: 31534308BACKGROUND
  • Levinson DB, Halverson TF, Wilson SM, Fu R. Less dropout from prolonged exposure sessions prescribed at least twice weekly: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Trauma Stress. 2022 Aug;35(4):1047-1059. doi: 10.1002/jts.22822. Epub 2022 Mar 12.

    PMID: 35278229BACKGROUND
  • Hoppen TH, Lindemann AS, Morina N. Safety of psychological interventions for adult post-traumatic stress disorder: meta-analysis on the incidence and relative risk of deterioration, adverse events and serious adverse events. Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12:1-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2022.111. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 35959698BACKGROUND
  • De Jongh, A., & Ten Broeke, E. (2019). Handboek EMDR. Een geprotocolleerde behandelmethode voor de gevolgen van psychotrauma (7e editie). Pearson.

    BACKGROUND
  • Van Minnen, A., & Arntz, A. (2017). Protocollaire behandeling van patiënten met posttraumatische-stressstoornis (PTSS). Imaginaire exposure en exposure in vivo. In G. Keijsers, A. Van Minnen, M. Verbraak, K. Hoogduin, P. Emmelkamp (Reds), Protocollaire behandelingen voor volwassenen met psychische klachten deel 1 (pp. 311-352). Boom.

    BACKGROUND
  • Koenen KC, Ratanatharathorn A, Ng L, McLaughlin KA, Bromet EJ, Stein DJ, Karam EG, Meron Ruscio A, Benjet C, Scott K, Atwoli L, Petukhova M, Lim CCW, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Bunting B, Ciutan M, de Girolamo G, Degenhardt L, Gureje O, Haro JM, Huang Y, Kawakami N, Lee S, Navarro-Mateu F, Pennell BE, Piazza M, Sampson N, Ten Have M, Torres Y, Viana MC, Williams D, Xavier M, Kessler RC. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(13):2260-2274. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000708. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

    PMID: 28385165BACKGROUND
  • Boeschoten, M. A., Bakker, A., Jongedijk, R. A., & Olff, M. (2014). PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from Stichting Centrum '45, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Groep. https://www.psychotraumadiagnostics.centrum45.nl/nl/ptss.nl

    BACKGROUND
  • Weathers, F. W., Blake, D. D., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Marx, B. P., & Keane, T. M. (2013). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Interview available from the National Center for PTSD. https://www.ptsd.va.gov

    BACKGROUND
  • Nienhuis, F. J., & Giel, R. (2000). Mini-SCAN voor klinisch gebruik. Swets & Zeitlinger.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eidhof, M., Ter Heide, F.J.J., Boeschoten, M.A., Olff, M. (2018). Internationale Trauma Vragenlijst: zelfrapportage vragenlijst voor ICD-11 PTSS en CPTSS. Nederlandstalige versie. Arq Psychotrauma Expert Groep. Scale available from http://www.psychotraumadiagnostics.centrum45.nl

    BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Lamers SM, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, ten Klooster PM, Keyes CL. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). J Clin Psychol. 2011 Jan;67(1):99-110. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20741.

    PMID: 20973032BACKGROUND
  • Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Houben, S. T. L., Broers, N. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2023). The Positive and Negative Experiences of Psychotherapy Questionnaire (PNEP): first psychometric findings of a new instrument for monitoring clients' experiences [Ongepubliceerd manuscript]. Afdeling Klinische Psychologie, Universiteit Maastricht; Faculteit Psychologie, Open Universiteit Heerlen.

    BACKGROUND
  • Weathers, F. W., Blake, D. D., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Marx, B. P., & Keane, T. M. (2013). The Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Instrument available from the National Center for PTSD. https://www.ptsd.va.gov

    BACKGROUND
  • Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0.

    PMID: 12615092BACKGROUND
  • Fraley RC, Heffernan ME, Vicary AM, Brumbaugh CC. The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):615-25. doi: 10.1037/a0022898.

    PMID: 21443364BACKGROUND
  • Derogatis, L.R. (1977). SCL-90-R Symptom Checklist-90-R Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. PsychCorp.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gamez W, Chmielewski M, Kotov R, Ruggero C, Suzuki N, Watson D. The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: development and initial validation. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):35-45. doi: 10.1037/a0034473. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

    PMID: 24059474BACKGROUND
  • Stinckens, N., Ulburghs, A., & Claes, L. (2009). De werkalliantie als sleutelelement in het therapiegebeuren: meting met behulp van de WAV-12, de Nederlandstalige verkorte versie van de Working Alliance Inventory. Tijdschrift Klinische Psychologie, 39(1), 44-60.

    BACKGROUND
  • Vervaecke, C.A.G., & Vertommen H. (1996). De Werk Alliantie Vragenlijst (wav). Gedragstherapie, 2, 139-144.

    BACKGROUND
  • Clark DM. Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):318-27. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606803.

    PMID: 22026487BACKGROUND
  • Foa, E. B., Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Tolin, D. F., & Orsillo, S. M. (1999). The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 303-314. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.303

    BACKGROUND
  • Kubany, E. S., Haynes, S. N., Abueg, F. R., Manke, F. P., Brennan, J. M., & Stahura, C. (1996). Development and validation of the Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory (TRGI). Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 428-444. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.428

    BACKGROUND
  • Øktedalen, T., Hagtvet, K. A., Hoffart, A., Langkaas, T. F., & Smucker, M. (2014). The Trauma Related Shame Inventory: Measuring trauma-related shame among patients with PTSD. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(4), 600-615. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1007/s10862-014-9422-5

    BACKGROUND
  • Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223

    BACKGROUND
  • Wibbelink CJM, Lee CW, Bachrach N, Dominguez SK, Ehring T, van Es SM, Fassbinder E, Kohne S, Mascini M, Meewisse ML, Menninga S, Morina N, Rameckers SA, Thomaes K, Walton CJ, Wigard IG, Arntz A. The effect of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of either imagery rescripting or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for adults with PTSD from childhood trauma (IREM-Freq): a study protocol for an international randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Nov 27;22(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05712-9.

    PMID: 34838102BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticWounds and Injuries

Interventions

Eye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingInterpersonal Psychotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Desensitization, PsychologicBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Maarten K van Dijk, PhD

    Dimence

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Maarten K van Dijk, PhD

CONTACT

Dominique Jonkers, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in two phases. Patients with PTSD will first be randomized to PE or EMDR in the first treatment phase. After this first phase of treatment, non-responders are re-randomized for a second phase of treatment. They receive either the alternative phase 1 trauma-focused psychotherapy or IPT as non-trauma-focused therapy for PTSD. In both phases (phase 1 and 2) the treatment lasts 8 weeks. Patients receive 14 sessions of 1 hour in 8 weeks.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2023

First Posted

February 28, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2032

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations