NCT06278844

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the impact of conduction system pacing in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing on exercise capacity, as measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), in heart failure patients with indication for pacing but no compelling indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure patients influenced by conduction system pacing will be assessed.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Dec 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
Dec 2023Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 12, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2024

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2024

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 26, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

conduction system pacingexercise capacityCardiopulmonary exercise testing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Exercise capacity

    Change of VO2 peak from baseline to 24 weeks

    24 weeks after pacemaker implantation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Exercise capacity

    4 weeks after pacemaker implantation

  • Echocardiographic parameters (Ejection Fraction)

    4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation

  • QRS width

    4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation

  • Biomarker, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels

    4 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation

  • Health-related quality of life scores

    4,12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation

Study Arms (2)

Conduction system pacing

EXPERIMENTAL

In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing.

Device: Conduction system pacing

Right ventricular apical pacing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group, in this group patients will receive a pacemaker with the ventricular lead in the right ventricle apex.

Device: Right ventricular apical pacing

Interventions

In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing. In the usual care group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricle apex as usual.

Conduction system pacing

This is the usual care group. Patients will receive a pacemaker device with the right ventricular lead inserted in the apex and not in the septal position.

Right ventricular apical pacing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with heart failure as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
  • Signs and/or symptoms of heart failure
  • AND LVEF \<50% OR LVEF ≥50% and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction/raised filling pressures
  • AND indication for cardiac pacing as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines

You may not qualify if:

  • Age under 18 years old
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide consent or to undergo follow-up
  • Class 1A indication for classical CRT as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Patients with a class 2A or higher indication for CRT can be included. However, patients with Class 1A indication for classical CRT but failure or suboptimal result of CS lead placement can be included.
  • Significant cardiac or extracardiac comorbidity precluding maximal exercise testing, examples: Recent (\<4 weeks) decompensation of heart failure, angina pectoris class ≥2 , uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia , severe valvular heart disease, significant peripheral vascular disease, orthopaedic limitation ...
  • Comorbidity that may influence 6-month prognosis, examples:
  • Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≤20 mL/kg/min or dialysis) , severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (≥GOLD 3) , active malignancy ...

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Edegem, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Andreas Gevaert

    University Hospital, Antwerp

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Andreas Gevaert

CONTACT

Faro Verelst

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2024

First Posted

February 26, 2024

Study Start

December 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations