Exercise Capacity Improvement by Conduction System Pacing in heArt Failure patieNts Without Compelling CRT inDication
ESCPAND
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the impact of conduction system pacing in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing on exercise capacity, as measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), in heart failure patients with indication for pacing but no compelling indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure patients influenced by conduction system pacing will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
February 26, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.7 years
February 7, 2024
February 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Exercise capacity
Change of VO2 peak from baseline to 24 weeks
24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Exercise capacity
4 weeks after pacemaker implantation
Echocardiographic parameters (Ejection Fraction)
4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
QRS width
4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
Biomarker, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels
4 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
Health-related quality of life scores
4,12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
Study Arms (2)
Conduction system pacing
EXPERIMENTALIn the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing.
Right ventricular apical pacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group, in this group patients will receive a pacemaker with the ventricular lead in the right ventricle apex.
Interventions
In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing. In the usual care group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricle apex as usual.
This is the usual care group. Patients will receive a pacemaker device with the right ventricular lead inserted in the apex and not in the septal position.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with heart failure as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
- Signs and/or symptoms of heart failure
- AND LVEF \<50% OR LVEF ≥50% and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction/raised filling pressures
- AND indication for cardiac pacing as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years old
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent or to undergo follow-up
- Class 1A indication for classical CRT as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Patients with a class 2A or higher indication for CRT can be included. However, patients with Class 1A indication for classical CRT but failure or suboptimal result of CS lead placement can be included.
- Significant cardiac or extracardiac comorbidity precluding maximal exercise testing, examples: Recent (\<4 weeks) decompensation of heart failure, angina pectoris class ≥2 , uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia , severe valvular heart disease, significant peripheral vascular disease, orthopaedic limitation ...
- Comorbidity that may influence 6-month prognosis, examples:
- Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≤20 mL/kg/min or dialysis) , severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (≥GOLD 3) , active malignancy ...
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andreas Gevaert
University Hospital, Antwerp
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2024
First Posted
February 26, 2024
Study Start
December 12, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share