Non-surgical Spinal Decompression in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this quasi-experimental trial was to evaluate the effects of non-surgical spinal decompression on disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain and sciatica throughout a two-month follow-up, and to analyze the relationship between demographic factors and clinical outcomes after a program of non-surgical spinal decompression. The main questions it aims to answer were:
- Non-surgical spinal decompression is effective to reduce pain intensity and self-reported disability in patients with chronic low back pain and sciatica?
- Age, level of education and work activities are related with clinical outcome in patients treated with non-surgical spinal decompression? Participants underwent eight sessions, three per week, with the BTL-6000 spinal decompression system. The study did not have a comparison group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedFebruary 6, 2025
February 1, 2025
3 months
February 9, 2024
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Self-reported disability
We measured self-reported disability associated with spine disorders through the spanish version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a reliable and validated instrument composed by ten sections (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and traveling), in which the patient grades the disability from zero (no limitation) to five (limitation prevents me from performing the activity). The ODI final score was calculated with the following formula: \[total score/(5 x number of answered questions)\] x 100%, and interpreted as the higher the score, the greater the disability.
Baseline, at the end of the eighth session, and at 2nd-month follow-up.
Pain intensity
Pain intensity was also evaluated with the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), a popular clinical tool consisting of a numbered straight line from zero (no pain) to ten (the worst pain), where the patients registered their current pain intensity.
Baseline, at the end of the eighth session, and at 2nd-month follow-up.
Study Arms (1)
Patients treated with non-surgical spinal decompression
EXPERIMENTALThe patients were positioned in supine with adjustable lumbar, and thoracic belts attached to the traction cord. After tightening the belts, the M7 position was selected to achieve hip and knee flexion, and posterior pelvic tilt of 25° was added. Before starting the therapy, the weight of the subject was entered in the panel, and a short tolerance test was carried out. Patients were provided with a manual switch to stop treatment any time. Preset lumbar disc herniation protocol was used. Each session lasted fifteen minutes, applied force had 100-gram step increments, and did not exceed 50% of the weight of the patient. At the end of the therapy, the cord was disconnected and belts were removed. Participants were asked to sit for three minutes to identify any adverse reaction.
Interventions
The patients were positioned in supine with adjustable lumbar, and thoracic belts attached to the traction cord. After tightening the belts, the M7 position was selected to achieve hip and knee flexion, and posterior pelvic tilt of 25° was added. Before starting the therapy, the weight of the subject was entered in the panel, and a short tolerance test was carried out. Patients were provided with a manual switch to stop treatment any time. Preset lumbar disc herniation protocol was used. Each session lasted fifteen minutes, applied force had 100-gram step increments, and did not exceed 50% of the weight of the patient. At the end of the therapy, the cord was disconnected and belts were removed. Participants were asked to sit for three minutes to identify any adverse reaction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 55 years old.
- Chronic (at least six months) low back pain (LBP) and/or sciatica.
- Abnormalities of intervertebral disc on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with prior spine surgery.
- Vertebral instability.
- Cancer.
- Current infectious disease.
- Pregnancy.
- Kinesiophobia.
- Fibromyalgia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tonatiuh Avila, MD
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2024
First Posted
February 23, 2024
Study Start
August 21, 2023
Primary Completion
November 29, 2023
Study Completion
January 11, 2024
Last Updated
February 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- No determined.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.