NCT06266910

Brief Summary

This study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

MyopiaBinocular visual functionBrain networkNeurovascular connectivity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accommodative facility

    Accommodative facility was tested using a lens flipper (+2.00D/-2.00 D lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.

    8 weeks after intervention

  • Vergence facility

    Vergence facility was tested using a lens flipper (3△BI/12△BO lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.

    8 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Negative and positive fusional vergence

    8 weeks after intervention

  • Accommodative response

    8 weeks after intervention

  • negative and positive relative accommodation

    8 weeks after intervention

  • Near point of convergence

    8 weeks after intervention

  • Accommodation amplitude

    8 weeks after intervention

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Three-dimensional (3D) viewing group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group watch a 10-minute training video displayed in 3D mode, twice a day (totaling 20 minutes), five days a week, for four consecutive weeks.

Other: Visual training video

Two-dimensional (2D) viewing group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants in this group watched a 10-minute training video displayed in 2D mode, twice a day (totaling 20 minutes), five days a week, for four consecutive weeks.

Other: Visual training video

Interventions

The video, designed according to the principles of pencil pushups, features a dynamic standard "E" and is presented on an autostereoscopic 3D display equipment.

Three-dimensional (3D) viewing groupTwo-dimensional (2D) viewing group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 30 years
  • Refractive errors:
  • spherical: -9.00 to -0.50 diopters (D), cylindrical: -2.50 to -0 D, and binocular difference within 2.0 D
  • Monocular best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/20
  • Normal stereoacuity
  • Participants capable of understanding the purpose of this study and providing informed consent
  • Participants capable of cooperating with relevant examinations.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of ophthalmic disease other than refractive error, such as strabismus, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal or optic nerve diseases
  • Use of any medications affecting accommodative function or wearing orthokeratology lenses in the past 1 month
  • History of ocular trauma or surgery
  • Suffering from systemic or mental illnesses.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zhongshan Opthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Han J, Hong S, Lee S, Kim JK, Lee HK, Han SH. Changes in fusional vergence amplitudes after laser refractive surgery for moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;40(10):1670-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.043. Epub 2014 Aug 20.

    PMID: 25149555BACKGROUND
  • Tsujimoto K, Mizuno K, Nishida D, Tahara M, Yamada E, Shindo S, Watanabe Y, Kasuga S, Liu M. Correlation between changes in functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network and the after-effects induced by prism adaptation in healthy humans: A dataset of resting-state fMRI and pointing after prism adaptation. Data Brief. 2018 Dec 18;22:583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.053. eCollection 2019 Feb.

    PMID: 30627613BACKGROUND
  • Wilf M, Serino A, Clarke S, Crottaz-Herbette S. Prism adaptation enhances decoupling between the default mode network and the attentional networks. Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.050. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

    PMID: 31233909BACKGROUND
  • Ang M, Flanagan JL, Wong CW, Muller A, Davis A, Keys D, Resnikoff S, Jong M, Wong TY, Sankaridurg P. Review: Myopia control strategies recommendations from the 2018 WHO/IAPB/BHVI Meeting on Myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1482-1487. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315575. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

    PMID: 32102791BACKGROUND
  • Huang Y, Li M, Shen Y, Liu F, Fang Y, Xu H, Zhou X. Study of the Immediate Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on the Accommodative Functions of Myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Feb 1;63(2):9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.2.9.

    PMID: 35113140BACKGROUND
  • Zhu Z, Chen Y, Tan Z, Xiong R, McGuinness MB, Muller A. Interventions recommended for myopia prevention and control among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;107(2):160-166. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319306. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

    PMID: 34844916BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
By employing a single simulation technology for blinding, both the 2D group and the 3D group share identical training equipment and a consistent video background. The only distinction lies in the subtle variation in the configuration of training markers. It is difficult for participants to differentiate their respective groups.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Posted

February 20, 2024

Study Start

February 15, 2024

Primary Completion

September 1, 2024

Study Completion

October 10, 2024

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations