Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on Binocular Vision Function of Myopes
Exploring the Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on Binocular Vision Function of Myopes Based on EEG and fNIRS
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2024
CompletedFebruary 20, 2024
January 1, 2024
7 months
February 1, 2024
February 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accommodative facility
Accommodative facility was tested using a lens flipper (+2.00D/-2.00 D lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
8 weeks after intervention
Vergence facility
Vergence facility was tested using a lens flipper (3△BI/12△BO lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
8 weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Negative and positive fusional vergence
8 weeks after intervention
Accommodative response
8 weeks after intervention
negative and positive relative accommodation
8 weeks after intervention
Near point of convergence
8 weeks after intervention
Accommodation amplitude
8 weeks after intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Three-dimensional (3D) viewing group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group watch a 10-minute training video displayed in 3D mode, twice a day (totaling 20 minutes), five days a week, for four consecutive weeks.
Two-dimensional (2D) viewing group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in this group watched a 10-minute training video displayed in 2D mode, twice a day (totaling 20 minutes), five days a week, for four consecutive weeks.
Interventions
The video, designed according to the principles of pencil pushups, features a dynamic standard "E" and is presented on an autostereoscopic 3D display equipment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 30 years
- Refractive errors:
- spherical: -9.00 to -0.50 diopters (D), cylindrical: -2.50 to -0 D, and binocular difference within 2.0 D
- Monocular best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/20
- Normal stereoacuity
- Participants capable of understanding the purpose of this study and providing informed consent
- Participants capable of cooperating with relevant examinations.
You may not qualify if:
- History of ophthalmic disease other than refractive error, such as strabismus, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal or optic nerve diseases
- Use of any medications affecting accommodative function or wearing orthokeratology lenses in the past 1 month
- History of ocular trauma or surgery
- Suffering from systemic or mental illnesses.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zhongshan Opthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (6)
Han J, Hong S, Lee S, Kim JK, Lee HK, Han SH. Changes in fusional vergence amplitudes after laser refractive surgery for moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;40(10):1670-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.043. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
PMID: 25149555BACKGROUNDTsujimoto K, Mizuno K, Nishida D, Tahara M, Yamada E, Shindo S, Watanabe Y, Kasuga S, Liu M. Correlation between changes in functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network and the after-effects induced by prism adaptation in healthy humans: A dataset of resting-state fMRI and pointing after prism adaptation. Data Brief. 2018 Dec 18;22:583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.053. eCollection 2019 Feb.
PMID: 30627613BACKGROUNDWilf M, Serino A, Clarke S, Crottaz-Herbette S. Prism adaptation enhances decoupling between the default mode network and the attentional networks. Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.050. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
PMID: 31233909BACKGROUNDAng M, Flanagan JL, Wong CW, Muller A, Davis A, Keys D, Resnikoff S, Jong M, Wong TY, Sankaridurg P. Review: Myopia control strategies recommendations from the 2018 WHO/IAPB/BHVI Meeting on Myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1482-1487. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315575. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
PMID: 32102791BACKGROUNDHuang Y, Li M, Shen Y, Liu F, Fang Y, Xu H, Zhou X. Study of the Immediate Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on the Accommodative Functions of Myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Feb 1;63(2):9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.2.9.
PMID: 35113140BACKGROUNDZhu Z, Chen Y, Tan Z, Xiong R, McGuinness MB, Muller A. Interventions recommended for myopia prevention and control among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;107(2):160-166. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319306. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
PMID: 34844916BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- By employing a single simulation technology for blinding, both the 2D group and the 3D group share identical training equipment and a consistent video background. The only distinction lies in the subtle variation in the configuration of training markers. It is difficult for participants to differentiate their respective groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2024
First Posted
February 20, 2024
Study Start
February 15, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 10, 2024
Last Updated
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share