Core Endurance in Healthy Young Adults

NCT06260540 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Core Endurance
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 104
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aimed to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. This region is a basic structure where the force required for all movements is generated and transmitted from the proximal segments to the distal segments. "Core" stabilization has a significant impact on limb functionality, and stabilization of the proximal segments is necessary to maintain the mobility and function of the distal segments. To establish a stable base during functional activities, the "core" muscles are activated before the upper and lower extremity muscles. This ensures force production and transfer of resulting forces, thus supporting the mobility of the distal segments. Increasing core stabilization increases force production in the extremities, and control of core strength, balance and movement maximizes upper and lower extremity functions. Any impairment in core stabilization reduces the quality of movement and increases the risk of injury to the upper extremity. Therefore, it has been stated that "core" stabilization has a significant effect on athletic performance and upper extremity functions. There are not enough studies in the literature investigating this effect in healthy young adults. Most existing studies focus on the role of core endurance on athlete performance. The aim of this study is not only to investigate core endurance levels in healthy young adults but also to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time.

Conditions

Health Risk Behaviors

Keywords

core endurance; upper extremity function; muscle strength; reaction time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Side bridge test

  It is used to evaluate the endurance of the muscles (especially the obliques) located on the lateral side of the body. The individual lies sideways on the dominant side. When he is ready, he lifts his hips and stands on his forearm as long as he can, with his body in a single line, without any command. He puts his free hand on the opposite shoulder. The time period during which the position is maintained is recorded in seconds.

  Day 1

• Prone bridge test (plank) test

  It is used to evaluate the endurance of all core stabilization muscles together. The individual lies face down on his knees and forearms. When he is ready, he raises his knees so they are parallel to the ground and stands on his forearms and fingertips, without commands. The time it maintains the position is recorded in seconds.

  Day 1

• Trunk flexion endurance test

  It is used to evaluate the endurance of the trunk flexors, especially the abdominal muscles. The individual is in a supine position. When he is ready, he pulls his knees to his stomach so that they are parallel to the ground, without any command, and at the same time, with his arms tied, he lifts his upper body so that the lower end of the scapula lifts off the ground. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.

  Day 1

• Sorensen test

  It is used to evaluate the endurance of the back extensors. The individual lies face down on a stretcher high off the ground, with the upper body hanging off the bed. The individual's body part that comes into contact with the bed is positioned so that the anterior superior iliac spine is located. He maintains his balance with the help of a chair with his hands. The physiotherapist stabilizes the patient's legs. When the individual is ready, he crosses both hands on his shoulders and takes a position parallel to the ground, without taking any commands. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.

  Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• Purdue Pegboard test

  Day 1

• Isometric hand dynamometer for muscle strength

  Day 1

• Nelson hand reaction test

  Day 1

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 25 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

104 Healthy young adults

You may qualify if:

• Individuals between the ages of 18-25.
• Individuals who volunteer to participate in the research.
• Individuals with normal joint movement.

You may not qualify if:

• Individuals with orthopedic or neurological diseases.
• Individuals who have suffered fractures, dislocations, surgeries, etc. in the upper extremities.
• Individuals with diseases that may affect upper extremity performance
• Individuals who exercise regularly
• Individuals who play any musical instrument

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Karabuk University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Karabuk University

Karabük, 78000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

• Bliss LS, Teeple P. Core stability: the centerpiece of any training program. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005 Jun;4(3):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s11932-005-0064-y.

  PMID: 15907272 BACKGROUND

• TIFFIN J, ASHER EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):234-47. doi: 10.1037/h0061266. No abstract available.

  PMID: 18867059 BACKGROUND

• Moreau CE, Green BN, Johnson CD, Moreau SR. Isometric back extension endurance tests: a review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Feb;24(2):110-22. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.112563.

  PMID: 11208223 BACKGROUND

• Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001.

  PMID: 16526831 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Health Risk Behaviors

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health Behavior; Behavior

Study Officials

• Agabek ORUNBAYEV Msc

  Karabuk University

  STUDY CHAIR

• Feruza JUMAYEVA Physiotherapist

  Karabuk University

  STUDY CHAIR

• Musa GÜNEŞ Msc

  Karabuk University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

• Metehan YANA PhD

  Karabuk Univeristy

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE ONLY
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Director

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 6, 2024
• First Posted: February 15, 2024
• Study Start: February 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: February 29, 2024
• Study Completion: April 29, 2024
• Last Updated: June 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations

TU (1)