NCT06260306

Brief Summary

The purpose of this investigation is to compare the effects of a combined hip activation and core stabilization training home exercise program (HEP) versus a hip activation training HEP alone on lower extremity (LE) frontal plane mechanics in healthy individuals. Specific Aim 1: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the Forward Step-Down test (FSDT) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP as compared to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 2: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the peak external knee abduction moment when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 3: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on gluteal and core muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 4: To determine whether a dose-response relationship exists between HEP compliance and change on the FSDT, peak external knee abduction moment, and sEMG.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 24, 2024

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 12, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 12, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Forward Step Down Test (FSDT)

    Rating on the FSDT (0-6; 0-1 = good movement quality, 2-3 = moderate movement quality, 4 or more = poor movement quality).

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Maximal volitional isometric contraction (MVIC) via sensory electromyography (sEMG) of gluteus maximus (GMax)

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

  • Mean activation of GMax via sEMG

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

  • Peak activation of GMax via sEMG

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

  • MVIC via sEMG of gluteus medius (GMed)

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

  • Mean activation of GMed via sEMG

    Pre- and post-eight week intervention

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Hip Activation Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The hip activation HEP group will receive a combination of hip musculature activation exercises used by previous researchers that show an increase in hip muscle recruitment.

Other: Hip activation home exercise program

Combined Hip Activation and Core Stabilization Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The hip activation plus core stabilization HEP group will receive the same hip exercises as the other group, plus core stabilization exercises used by previous researchers.

Other: Hip activation plus core stabilization home exercise program

Interventions

The hip activation HEP group will receive a combination of hip musculature activation exercises used by previous researchers that show an increase in hip muscle recruitment. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.

Hip Activation Group

The hip activation plus core stabilization HEP group will receive the same hip exercises, plus core stabilization exercises used by previous researchers. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.

Combined Hip Activation and Core Stabilization Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants will be current first- or second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students in the School of Allied Health Professions (SAHP) at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport over the age of 21.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current pain or pathology in either LE which currently limits their ability to perform the FSDT or drop landing task, a history of low back pain in the last three months, known pregnancy, as pregnancy is a risk factor for diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) which may be exacerbated by participation in the intervention and could be a confounding variable, and current participation in other clinical trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport

Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Clark L, Dean A, Mitchell A, & Torgerson DJ. Envelope use and reporting in randomised controlled trials: a guide for researchers. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2021;2(1):2-11. doi:10.1177/2632084320957204

    BACKGROUND
  • Konrad P. The ABC of EMG: A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography. Noraxon U.S.A.; 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gage BE, McIlvain NM, Collins CL, Fields SK, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of 6.6 million knee injuries presenting to United States emergency departments from 1999 through 2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):378-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01315.x.

  • Nguyen US, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Niu J, Zhang B, Felson DT. Increasing prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: survey and cohort data. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 6;155(11):725-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00004.

  • Bolgla LA, Boling MC, Mace KL, DiStefano MJ, Fithian DC, Powers CM. National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Management of Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain. J Athl Train. 2018 Sep;53(9):820-836. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-231-15.

  • Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;40(2):42-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3337.

  • Mascal CL, Landel R, Powers C. Management of patellofemoral pain targeting hip, pelvis, and trunk muscle function: 2 case reports. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Nov;33(11):647-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.647.

  • Leetun DT, Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jun;36(6):926-34. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000128145.75199.c3.

  • Huxel Bliven KC, Anderson BE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health. 2013 Nov;5(6):514-22. doi: 10.1177/1941738113481200.

  • Kim B, Yim J. Core Stability and Hip Exercises Improve Physical Function and Activity in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jul;251(3):193-206. doi: 10.1620/tjem.251.193.

  • Flowers DW, Brewer W, Mitchell K, Ellison J, Frilot C. The Effect of Core Stabilization Training on Improving Gait and Self-Perceived Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial. Pathophysiology. 2022 Sep 1;29(3):495-506. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29030040.

  • McCallister E, Flowers D. Can the Forward-Step-Down Test Be Used Reliably in the Clinical Setting to Assess Movement Changes Resulting from Maximal Exertion? A Pilot Study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. Published online 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2020.1931

    RESULT
  • Flowers DW, Brewer W, Ellison J, Mitchell K, Frilot C. Transversus abdominis activation does not alter gait impairments in patients with and without knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Feb;82:105270. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105270. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

  • Cannon J, Weithman BA, Powers CM. Activation training facilitates gluteus maximus recruitment during weight-bearing strengthening exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Apr;63:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

  • Loudon JK, Wiesner D, Goist-Foley HL, Asjes C, Loudon KL. Intrarater Reliability of Functional Performance Tests for Subjects With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. J Athl Train. 2002 Sep;37(3):256-261.

  • Park KM, Cynn HS, Choung SD. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down test in asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-10. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4073. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

  • Ishida T, Koshino Y, Yamanaka M, Ueno R, Taniguchi S, Samukawa M, Saito H, Matsumoto H, Aoki Y, Tohyama H. The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 20;19(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4.

  • McNair PJ, Prapavessis H. Normative data of vertical ground reaction forces during landing from a jump. J Sci Med Sport. 1999 Mar;2(1):86-8. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(99)80187-x.

  • Argent R, Daly A, Caulfield B. Patient Involvement With Home-Based Exercise Programs: Can Connected Health Interventions Influence Adherence? JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 1;6(3):e47. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8518.

  • Cavalli M, Aiolfi A, Bruni PG, Manfredini L, Lombardo F, Bonfanti MT, Bona D, Campanelli G. Prevalence and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis: a review and proposal of a new anatomical variation. Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):883-890. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02468-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

  • Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Which exercises target the gluteal muscles while minimizing activation of the tensor fascia lata? Electromyographic assessment using fine-wire electrodes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;43(2):54-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4116. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

  • Harput G, Ulusoy B, Akmese R, Ergun N. Comparison of muscle activation levels and knee valgus between individuals with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and healthy individuals during fatiguing step down task. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Aug;78:105067. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105067. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

  • Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Comparison of Electromyographic Activity of the Superior and Inferior Portions of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle During Common Therapeutic Exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):794-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6493. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

  • Okubo Y, Kaneoka K, Imai A, Shiina I, Tatsumura M, Izumi S, Miyakawa S. Electromyographic analysis of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus using wire electrodes during lumbar stabilization exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40(11):743-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3192.

  • Fan B, Xia H, Xu J, Li Q, Shull PB. IMU-based knee flexion, abduction and internal rotation estimation during drop landing and cutting tasks. J Biomech. 2021 Jul 19;124:110549. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110549. Epub 2021 Jun 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dyskinesias

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Movement DisordersCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Daniel W. Flowers, PT, DPT, PhD

    LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The PI who will be performing the data analysis will be blinded to participants' random group allocation. The other investigators who will be collecting the outcome data will know the group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2024

First Posted

February 15, 2024

Study Start

January 24, 2024

Primary Completion

April 12, 2024

Study Completion

April 12, 2024

Last Updated

April 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations