Comparative Evaluation of Three Pulpotomy Agents for Permanent Mature Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Statement of the problem: Accurate pulpal diagnosis is essential for decision making between vital pulp therapy and root canal treatment. Clinical and radiographic examinations do not correctly reflect the histological state of the pulp and consequently its ability to heal. Also, despite the various advantages of using MTA as a pulp capping agent, it has several drawbacks. Aim of the study: The aim of the study is to compare two types of calcium silicate-based materials to MTA in permanent mature molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis regarding the following parameters; level of inflammatory biomarker level, clinical and radiographic outcomes. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients with mature permanent molars exhibiting signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis will be enrolled. A careful periodontal treatment and standardized operative procedure will be followed for all participants. Gingival crevicular fluid samples will be obtained before any local anesthetics' administration, followed by isolation of teeth with a dental dam and removal of caries. Pulpotomy will be performed using sterile round bur till level of orifices and then haemostasis will be achieved using sodium hypochlorite. At this point, patients will be randomly divided into three groups of 12 depending on the type of calcium silicate-based material used. Later, resin modified glass ionomer will be applied, etching, bonding and placement of composite as the permanent restoration. Follow up clinically and radiographically will be done.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 31, 2024
September 1, 2023
8 months
September 13, 2023
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inflammatory marker level (matrix metalloproteinase 9) for assessment of pulpotomy success.
Inflammation biomarker which is matrix metalloproteinase 9 (diagnostic) may be provided by molecules expressed during the cascade of tissue inflammation. Also, studies have demonstrated that the presence of protein markers or biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) can represent pulpal events
Inflammatory biomarker level in gingival crevicular fluid using ELISA kit at the day of the procedure and then after 1 week .
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic evaluation
baseline, after 6 and 12 months
Study Arms (3)
Odontocem pulpotomy agent
EXPERIMENTALcalcium silicate-based technology containing 0.2% of the low steroid triamcinolone acetonide and has outstanding biocompatibility, handling properties and least amount of staining potential
NeoPutty bioceramic
ACTIVE COMPARATORpremixed format of tricalcium silicate-based material (Bioceramic). It's composed of tantalum oxide, tricalcium silicate, calcium aluminate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, and calcium sulfate
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate material
ACTIVE COMPARATORhydrophilic and biocompatible endodontic biomaterial, capable of stimulating healing and osteogenesis
Interventions
vital pulp therapy for molars with irreversible pulpitis instead of doing root canal treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with permanent molars considered as having clinical signs and symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis if they presented with the following chief complaint:
- Intermittent or spontaneous, sharp or dull, localized, diffuse, or referred pain.
- Rapid exposure to dramatic temperature changes elicited heightened and --prolonged episodes of pain even after the thermal stimulus has been removed.
- Participants without signs and symptoms of apical periodontitis
- Periodontally healthy permanent molars
- Systemically healthy patients without any history of long-acting NSAIDs intake in the past one week will be included to eliminate any confounding factors.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-restorable teeth with cracks or subgingival caries, associated sinus or swelling, immature roots, periapical rarefaction (PAI score ≥ 3).
- Poor periodontal support.
- Negative response to pulp sensibility tests.
- Diabetic, immune-compromised, pregnant patients
- Patient had a positive history of antibiotic use in the past 1 month or required antibiotic prophylaxis
- The tooth was previously accessed
- The tooth had an inflamed pulp in which bleeding could not be controlled within 10 minutes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2023
First Posted
January 31, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share