Liposomal vs. Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: A Pilot Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot study is to test the hypothesis that liposomal bupivacaine extends the duration of paravertebral block in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, achieving improved analgesia compared to conventional bupivacaine. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Area under curve of numeric rating scale of pain from 12 to 72 h after surgery.
- Cumulative opioid consumption during the period of 12 to 72 h after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 14, 2024
CompletedJuly 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
7 months
January 21, 2024
July 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) between 12 and 72 hours after surgery
The composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) will be calculated using the area under curve (AUC) of pain intensity and cumulative opioid consumption between 12 and 72 hours in the postoperative period.
Between 12 and 72 hours afer surgery
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time to onset after paravertebral block
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
Time to maximal block after paravertebral block
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
Extent of paravertebral block
From end of nerve block to 72 hours after surgery.
Paravertebral block-related adverse events.
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
A composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) within 72 hours after surgery.
Up to 72 hours after surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Patients' satisfaction with pain management.
Up to 3 days after surgery.
Incidence of postoperative complications
Up to 30 days after surgery
Quality of recovery
At 24 hours after surgery and discharge
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lipo-bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALParavertebral block is performed with liposomal bupivacaine.
Bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORParavertebral block is performed with bupivacaine.
Interventions
Paravertebral block is performed using liposomal bupivacaine.
Paravertebral block is performed using bupivacaine.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 70 years old.
- Scheduled for laparoscopic-assisted unilateral radical nephrectomy.
- Agree to undergo regional nerve blockade and receive patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Renal cancer with venous thrombus of grade II or higher, or cases that may convert to open surgery.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m² or ≤15 kg/m².
- Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \>442 μmol/L or requiring renal replacement therapy), severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥IV.
- Contraindications for deep nerve block, including severe spinal deformity or history of spinal surgery, severe coagulation abnormalities (international normalized ratio \>1.7, activated partial thromboplastin time \>4 seconds above normal, platelet count \<80×10⁹/L), trauma or infection at the planned puncture site, or severe lumbar back pain.
- Chronic opioid dependence and long-term use of various analgesics for more than 3 months.
- Preoperative inability to communicate due to severe dementia, language barriers, or end-stage diseases.
- Preoperative concomitant central nervous system and/or peripheral nervous system diseases.
- Planned endotracheal intubation and admission to the intensive care unit after surgery.
- Known allergy to local anesthetics.
- Other conditions that are deemed unsuitable for trial participation by the attending surgeons or investigators.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China
Related Publications (20)
Ergun M, Berkers AW, van der Jagt MF, Langenhuijsen JF, van Ozdemir-Brunschot D, van der Vliet JA, D'Ancona FC, Warle MC. Components of pain assessment after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Feb;58(2):219-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12236. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
PMID: 24308727BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
PMID: 35020204BACKGROUNDMathuram Thiyagarajan U, Bagul A, Nicholson ML. Pain management in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a review. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:201852. doi: 10.1155/2012/201852. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PMID: 23150820BACKGROUNDSimpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):121-128. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676477. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PMID: 30833861BACKGROUNDThavaneswaran P, Rudkin GE, Cooter RD, Moyes DG, Perera CL, Maddern GJ. Brief reports: paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1740-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da82c8. Epub 2010 May 6.
PMID: 20448076BACKGROUNDCummings KC 3rd, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, Sessler DI. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):446-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer159. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
PMID: 21676892BACKGROUNDSafa B, Flynn B, McHardy PG, Kiss A, Haslam L, Henry PD, Kaustov L, Choi S. Comparison of the Analgesic Duration of 0.5% Bupivacaine With 1:200,000 Epinephrine Versus 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 1% Ropivacaine for Low-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1129-1137. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005373.
PMID: 33464760BACKGROUNDChahar P, Cummings KC 3rd. Liposomal bupivacaine: a review of a new bupivacaine formulation. J Pain Res. 2012;5:257-64. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S27894. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PMID: 23049275BACKGROUNDMalik O, Kaye AD, Kaye A, Belani K, Urman RD. Emerging roles of liposomal bupivacaine in anesthesia practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):151-156. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_375_15.
PMID: 28781438BACKGROUNDPedoto A, Noel J, Park BJ, Amar D. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 May;35(5):1393-1398. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
PMID: 33376072BACKGROUNDBalkhy HH, Arnsdorf S, Krienbring D, Urban J. Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Cardiac Surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):416-9. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000190.
PMID: 26633002BACKGROUNDBergese SD, Ramamoorthy S, Patou G, Bramlett K, Gorfine SR, Candiotti KA. Efficacy profile of liposome bupivacaine, a novel formulation of bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia. J Pain Res. 2012;5:107-16. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S30861. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22570563BACKGROUNDRice DC, Cata JP, Mena GE, Rodriguez-Restrepo A, Correa AM, Mehran RJ. Posterior Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: An Alternative to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.074. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
PMID: 25912739BACKGROUNDNeMoyer RE, Pantin E, Aisner J, Jongco R, Mellender S, Chiricolo A, Moore DF, Langenfeld J. Paravertebral Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy. J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.093. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
PMID: 31550671BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Eisenach JC, Gabriel RA. Clinical Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered by Infiltration or Peripheral Nerve Block to Treat Postoperative Pain. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):283-344. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003630.
PMID: 33372949BACKGROUNDHussain N, Brull R, Sheehy B, Essandoh MK, Stahl DL, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. Perineural Liposomal Bupivacaine Is Not Superior to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine for Peripheral Nerve Block Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):147-164. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003651.
PMID: 33372953BACKGROUNDDinges HC, Wiesmann T, Otremba B, Wulf H, Eberhart LH, Schubert AK. The analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride for the prevention of postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):490-498. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102427. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
PMID: 33837139BACKGROUNDKohoutova L, Atlas LY, Buchel C, Buhle JT, Geuter S, Jepma M, Koban L, Krishnan A, Lee DH, Lee S, Roy M, Schafer SM, Schmidt L, Wager TD, Woo CW. Individual variability in brain representations of pain. Nat Neurosci. 2022 Jun;25(6):749-759. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01081-x. Epub 2022 May 30.
PMID: 35637368BACKGROUNDWhitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26092476BACKGROUNDMyles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
PMID: 9895071BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Peking University First Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2024
First Posted
January 30, 2024
Study Start
February 21, 2024
Primary Completion
September 9, 2024
Study Completion
October 14, 2024
Last Updated
July 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share