NCT05788393

Brief Summary

Opioid sparing analgesia: Continuous intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be explained to the patient to be able to choose the score that best expressed the intensity of pain postoperatively ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable".

    15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale

    15 minutes

  • First call for rescue analgesic (Nalbuphine)

    1 day

  • The total postoperative Nalbuphine consumption

    1 day

  • Intraoperative automated non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.

    1 hour

  • Intraoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate monitoring.

    1 hour

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Side effects of study drugs.

    1 hour

  • Satisfaction of the patients questionnaire

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Dexmedetomidine group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive continuous intraoperative dexmedetomidine IV infusion \[1ug/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min as a loading dose and 0.5ug/kg/h for maintenance\].

Drug: Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

Lidocaine group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive continuous intraoperative lidocaine IV infusion \[1.5 mg/kg lidocaine over 15 min as a loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg/h for maintenance\].

Drug: Lidocaine IV

Interventions

lidocaine group will receive continuous intraoperative lidocaine IV infusion \[1.5 mg/kg lidocaine over 15 min as a loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg/h for maintenance\]. The continuous intraoperative IV infusion of study drug will be stopped 10 min before the end the surgical procedure.

Lidocaine group

dexmedetomidine group will receive continuous intraoperative dexmedetomidine IV infusion \[1ug/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min as a loading dose and 0.5ug/kg/h for maintenance\].The continuous intraoperative IV infusion of study drug will be stopped 10 min before the end the surgical procedure.

Dexmedetomidine group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient's status ASA status-I and II.
  • Patients age above 18 years old.
  • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients with known allergy to dexmedetomidine or lidocaine.
  • Patients with significant hepatic dysfunction.
  • Patients with severe renal disease.
  • Patients with chronic pain.
  • Regular use analgesics, antidepressants or opioids in last month.
  • Any known convulsive disorder.
  • Significant heart disease.
  • Morbid obesity (BMI\>35).
  • Patients with autoimmune disease
  • Patients on corticosteroid therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Woman under hormonal treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university hospitals

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Mitra S, Carlyle D, Kodumudi G, Kodumudi V, Vadivelu N. New Advances in Acute Postoperative Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Apr 4;22(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0690-8.

    PMID: 29619627BACKGROUND
  • Meera A. Pain and Opioid Dependence: Is it a Matter of Concern. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(Suppl):S36-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.76240.

    PMID: 21811368BACKGROUND
  • Barends CR, Absalom A, van Minnen B, Vissink A, Visser A. Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Procedural Sedation. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169525. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28107373BACKGROUND
  • Batko I, Koscielniak-Merak B, Tomasik PJ, Kobylarz K, Wordliczek J. Lidocaine as an element of multimodal analgesic therapy in major spine surgical procedures in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Pharmacol Rep. 2020 Jun;72(3):744-755. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00100-7. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

    PMID: 32297162BACKGROUND
  • Bellon M, Le Bot A, Michelet D, Hilly J, Maesani M, Brasher C, Dahmani S. Efficacy of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Compared with Placebo for Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies. Pain Ther. 2016 Jun;5(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0045-2. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

    PMID: 26861737BACKGROUND
  • Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.

    PMID: 27199310BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.

    PMID: 3785962BACKGROUND
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Mohamed S. Saad, Dr

    Assiut university hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: this study is to compare the effects of continuous intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine as opioid sparing analgesia on patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Primary investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2023

First Posted

March 28, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2025

Study Completion

February 1, 2025

Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations