Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Yoga for Knee Osteoarthritis
Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Yoga for Improved Pain Management for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
3
Brief Summary
People with knee arthritis often experience constant pain, and current treatments aren't very effective. This can lead to limited movement and more health problems. Knee arthritis is a big part of healthcare costs in Canada, and its pain is a major reason people see doctors. The pain is linked to complex nervous system changes, making current treatments, like exercise, not very successful. To address this, researchers suggest a new approach combining two things: a brain stimulation technique called Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and yoga. TDCS helps with pain by changing how the brain works, and yoga, a safe practice, focuses on overall well-being. Together, the investigators aim to improve how the nervous system works from top to bottom. The research project wants to change how the arthritis pain is being managed by focusing on how it works. The investigators plan to test this combo in a study comparing real tDCS plus yoga with fake tDCS plus yoga. The investigators will look not only at pain but also at other measures related to pain and how the nervous system works. This new mix could be a meaningful way to reduce pain for people with knee arthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Oct 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedNovember 21, 2024
November 1, 2024
11 months
January 16, 2024
November 20, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of complete follow up
Percentage rate measured by those at baseline completing study follow up measures
9 weeks and 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Brief Pain Inventory - Numeric Rating Scale
9 weeks and 3 months
Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
9 weeks and 3 months
Endogenous pain modulation
9 weeks
Pain interference
9 weeks and 3 months
Pain catastrophizing
9 weeks and 3 months
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTALActive tDCS Arm: In Week 1, participants in the Active tDCS arm will undergo five in-person visits for the administration of active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Subsequently, from Weeks 2 to 9, participants will receive weekly active tDCS sessions preceding the scheduled yoga sessions. For the active tDCS sessions, a constant current stimulator will be employed to deliver direct current through a pair of surface sponge electrodes (5Ă—7 cm) soaked in saline. Participants will undergo anodal stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the most painful site (C3 or C4 based on the electroencephalogram 10/20 system). The cathodal electrode will be positioned on the supraorbital area contralateral to the anode. During active tDCS, a constant anodal current of 2 mA will be administered for 20 minutes, a duration known to enhance cortical excitability and alleviate pain. T
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORSham tDCS Arm: tDCS: In Week 1, participants in the Sham tDCS arm will attend five in-person visits for the administration of sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). From Weeks 2 to 9, participants will receive weekly sham tDCS sessions before the scheduled yoga sessions. Constant current stimulator will be used to deliver direct current through a pair of surface sponge electrodes (5Ă—7 cm) soaked in saline. Participants will undergo sham stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the most painful site (C3 or C4 based on the electroencephalogram 10/20 system). During sham tDCS, the electrodes will be placed in the same montage as the active tDCS; however, current will only be applied for the initial and final 30 seconds of the 20-minute session. Consequently, participants will experience the sensation of current ramping up and down but will receive no current for the remaining stimulation period.
Interventions
Yoga program: In weeks 2-9, participants will attend twice weekly 1-hour sessions of yoga led by a certified yoga instructor trained in the intervention by collaborator Pearson. Videos will be provided for completion of home sessions. The yoga program is based on the Pain Care Aware certification program.38 Details of the program as well as the training of instructors are provided in the appendices. Briefly, classes will consist of 3 parts: centring and warming up aimed at regulating physiology prior to beginning the yoga postures; yoga postures and guided relaxation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- community dwelling adults from Sherbrooke, Quebec, Hamilton and London, Ontario fulfilling the NICE criteria for KOA
- ≥45 years of age
- Diagnosis of Knee osteoarthritis OR
- Having movement-related joint pain with either no morning knee stiffness or stiffness of 30 minutes or less AND
- Experiencing an average pain intensity of ≥3 /10 in the past month
You may not qualify if:
- Systemic inflammatory arthritis.
- Any knee injection in the past 3 months.
- Inability to independently get up and down from the floor.
- Lower limb trauma or surgery within the last 6 months.
- Current participation in another OA clinical trial.
- Use of mobility aids.
- Currently receiving care for KOA pain (e.g., physiotherapy).
- Planned absences exceeding 1 week.
- Contraindications to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) such as neurological or neuropsychiatric conditions.
- History of brain surgery or tumor.
- Metallic implants.
- Epilepsy or history of substance abuse or dependence.
- Cochlear or ocular implant.
- Presence of a pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator.
- Eczema on the scalp.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McMaster Universitylead
- The Arthritis Society, Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S1C7, Canada
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
Université de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1K 2R1, Canada
Related Publications (40)
Wallis JA, Taylor NF, Bunzli S, Shields N. Experience of living with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e030060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030060.
PMID: 31551381BACKGROUNDCalders P, Van Ginckel A. Presence of comorbidities and prognosis of clinical symptoms in knee and/or hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jun;47(6):805-813. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PMID: 29157670BACKGROUNDKendzerska T, Juni P, King LK, Croxford R, Stanaitis I, Hawker GA. The longitudinal relationship between hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis and cardiovascular events: a population-based cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1771-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
PMID: 28801210BACKGROUNDArthritis Alliance of Canada. The Impact of Arthritis in Canada: Today and over the Next 30 years. Executive Summary. 2011.
BACKGROUNDSharif B, Kopec JA, Wong H, Anis AH. Distribution and Drivers of Average Direct Cost of Osteoarthritis in Canada From 2003 to 2010. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Feb;69(2):243-251. doi: 10.1002/acr.22933.
PMID: 27159532BACKGROUNDNeogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018.
PMID: 23973124BACKGROUNDFingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, Fullen BM, Doody C. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1043-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.163. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PMID: 25749012BACKGROUNDCarlesso LC, Segal NA, Frey-Law L, Zhang Y, Na L, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Neogi T. Pain Susceptibility Phenotypes in Those Free of Knee Pain With or at Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;71(4):542-549. doi: 10.1002/art.40752. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
PMID: 30307131BACKGROUNDO'Leary H, Smart KM, Moloney NA, Blake C, Doody CM. Pain sensitization associated with nonresponse after physiotherapy in people with knee osteoarthritis. Pain. 2018 Sep;159(9):1877-1886. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001288.
PMID: 29794610BACKGROUNDBannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
PMID: 31278997BACKGROUNDKolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):220-233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
PMID: 31908163BACKGROUNDFernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, Doherty M, Geenen R, Hammond A, Kjeken I, Lohmander LS, Lund H, Mallen CD, Nava T, Oliver S, Pavelka K, Pitsillidou I, da Silva JA, de la Torre J, Zanoli G, Vliet Vlieland TP; European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1125-35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202745. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
PMID: 23595142BACKGROUNDFransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1554-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
PMID: 26405113BACKGROUNDHall M, Dobson F, Plinsinga M, Mailloux C, Starkey S, Smits E, Hodges P, Vicenzino B, Schabrun SM, Masse-Alarie H. Effect of exercise on pain processing and motor output in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Dec;28(12):1501-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
PMID: 32783909BACKGROUNDAhn H, Sorkpor S, Miao H, Zhong C, Jorge R, Park L, Abdi S, Cho RY. Home-based self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults with knee osteoarthritis pain: An open-label study. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;66:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 May 29.
PMID: 31153751BACKGROUNDAhn H, Suchting R, Woods AJ, Miao H, Green C, Cho RY, Choi E, Fillingim RB. Bayesian analysis of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimental pain sensitivity in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: randomized sham-controlled pilot clinical study. J Pain Res. 2018 Sep 27;11:2071-2082. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S173080. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30310309BACKGROUNDTavares DRB, Okazaki JEF, Santana MVA, Pinto ACPN, Tutiya KK, Gazoni FM, Pinto CB, Santos FC, Fregni F, Trevisani VFM. Motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation effects on knee osteoarthritis pain in elderly subjects with dysfunctional descending pain inhibitory system: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):477-487. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
PMID: 33684598BACKGROUNDPinto CB, Teixeira Costa B, Duarte D, Fregni F. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain. J ECT. 2018 Sep;34(3):e36-e50. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000518.
PMID: 29952860BACKGROUNDLee PG, Jackson EA, Richardson CR. Exercise Prescriptions in Older Adults. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Apr 1;95(7):425-432.
PMID: 28409595BACKGROUNDSolomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Kiyota Y, Levin R, Mogun H, Avorn J. Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation. 2004 May 4;109(17):2068-73. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127578.21885.3E. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
PMID: 15096449BACKGROUNDPearson N, Prosko S, Sullivan M, Taylor MJ. White Paper: Yoga Therapy and Pain-How Yoga Therapy Serves in Comprehensive Integrative Pain Management, and How It Can Do More. Int J Yoga Therap. 2020 Jan 1;30(1):117-133. doi: 10.17761/2020-D-19-00074.
PMID: 32412808BACKGROUNDMacKay C, Jaglal SB, Sale J, Badley EM, Davis AM. A qualitative study of the consequences of knee symptoms: 'It's like you're an athlete and you go to a couch potato'. BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 16;4(10):e006006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006006.
PMID: 25324325BACKGROUNDNyvang J, Hedstrom M, Gleissman SA. It's not just a knee, but a whole life: A qualitative descriptive study on patients' experiences of living with knee osteoarthritis and their expectations for knee arthroplasty. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Mar 31;11:30193. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30193. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27036130BACKGROUNDChang WJ, Bennell KL, Hodges PW, Hinman RS, Young CL, Buscemi V, Liston MB, Schabrun SM. Addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to quadriceps strengthening exercise in knee osteoarthritis: A pilot randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0180328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180328. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28665989BACKGROUNDAhn H, Zhong C, Miao H, Chaoul A, Park L, Yen IH, Vila MA, Sorkpor S, Abdi S. Efficacy of combining home-based transcranial direct current stimulation with mindfulness-based meditation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;70:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.047. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
PMID: 31421990BACKGROUNDCardenas-Rojas A, Pacheco-Barrios K, Giannoni-Luza S, Rivera-Torrejon O, Fregni F. Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with exercise in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Apr;20(4):401-412. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1738927. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
PMID: 32130037BACKGROUNDSefat O, Salehinejad MA, Danilewitz M, Shalbaf R, Vila-Rodriguez F. Combined Yoga and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increase Functional Connectivity and Synchronization in the Frontal Areas. Brain Topogr. 2022 Mar;35(2):207-218. doi: 10.1007/s10548-022-00887-z. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
PMID: 35092544BACKGROUNDLauche R, Hunter DJ, Adams J, Cramer H. Yoga for Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 Jul 23;21(9):47. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0846-5.
PMID: 31338685BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26978655BACKGROUNDChan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
PMID: 23295957BACKGROUNDMoonaz S, Nault D, Cramer H, Ward L. CLARIFY 2021: explanation and elaboration of the Delphi-based guidelines for the reporting of yoga research. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 5;11(8):e045812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045812.
PMID: 34353794BACKGROUNDThabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
PMID: 20053272BACKGROUNDRoizenblatt S, Fregni F, Gimenez R, Wetzel T, Rigonatti SP, Tufik S, Boggio PS, Valle AC. Site-specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on sleep and pain in fibromyalgia: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Pain Pract. 2007 Dec;7(4):297-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00152.x. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
PMID: 17986164BACKGROUNDFregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
PMID: 16564618BACKGROUNDKim YJ, Ku J, Kim HJ, Im DJ, Lee HS, Han KA, Kang YJ. Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;37(6):766-76. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
PMID: 24466511BACKGROUNDMori F, Codeca C, Kusayanagi H, Monteleone F, Buttari F, Fiore S, Bernardi G, Koch G, Centonze D. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Pain. 2010 May;11(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
PMID: 20018567BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
PMID: 10990547BACKGROUNDGandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
PMID: 16427357BACKGROUNDKessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, Hamilton RH. Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012 Apr;5(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
PMID: 22037128BACKGROUNDPalm U, Reisinger E, Keeser D, Kuo MF, Pogarell O, Leicht G, Mulert C, Nitsche MA, Padberg F. Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
PMID: 23415938BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisa Carlesso, PhD
McMaster University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2024
First Posted
January 29, 2024
Study Start
October 20, 2024
Primary Completion
September 15, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
November 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share