NCT06220253

Brief Summary

Randomized prospective monocentric interventional study to compare learning curves for traditional vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy performed by bipolar coagulation comparing short-term outcomes for both procedures.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2022

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapseurogynecologic surgerylearning curvebipolar vessels sealing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Learning curve comparison

    The primary objective of the study is to compare the learning curves (in terms of operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications) for two vaginal surgical techniques for hysterectomy performed for the treatment of prolapse of the pelvic organs in women. The two procedures compared will be the traditional technique performed by applying reabsorbable sutures and the bipolar coagulation technique.

    immediate post operative time

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the two different techniques of vaginal hysterectomy.

    3 days after the surgical procedure

Study Arms (2)

Vaginal Hysterectomy by bipolar coagulation technique

OTHER

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy, after incision of the portio, detachment of the bladder-vaginal fascia and vaginal rectum, opening of the anterior and posterior peritoneum, taking, section and ligament of the ligaments uterus-sacral ligaments, and subsequent coagulation by bipolar instrument of the other structures of the uterus and their section, in particular of the uterine arteries, tubes, uterine-ovarian ligaments and round ligament bilaterally.

Procedure: vaginal hysterectomy by bipolar vessels sealing

Vaginal hysterectomy by traditional technique with reabsorbable stitches

OTHER

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy, after incision of the port, detachment of the bladder-vaginal fascia and vaginal rectum, opening of the anterior and posterior peritoneum, taking and suturing with absorbable threads of all the support structures of the uterus, in particular uterus-sacral ligaments, uterine arteries, tubes, uterine-ovarian ligaments and round ligament bilaterally.

Procedure: vaginal hysterectomy by traditional technique

Interventions

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy and all the support structures will be coagulated and cut by a bipolar vessel sealing instrument

Vaginal Hysterectomy by bipolar coagulation technique

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy and all the support structures will be sutured by absorbable threads

Vaginal hysterectomy by traditional technique with reabsorbable stitches

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged \>18 years
  • Genital prolapse \> II degree in accordance with the "POP-Q System" eligible for vaginal hysterectomy
  • Understanding and signing of informed consent for surgical procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Need for simultaneous bilateral adnexectomy
  • Previous cesarian section
  • Patients with abdominal laparoscopic or laparotomy history
  • Patients with malignant pathology and/or adnexal pathology
  • Confirmed or presumed pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Arianna Casiraghi

Milan, 20159, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseGenital Diseases, Female

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Stefano Salvatore, MD

    San Raffaele Hospital, Milan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Arianna Casiraghi, MD

CONTACT

Stefano Salvatore, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized 1:1 in two groups: 1. Study group: bipolar coagulation technique 2. Comparison group: reabsorbable stitches
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2022

First Posted

January 23, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

March 1, 2025

Study Completion

March 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Locations