NCT06219369

Brief Summary

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become a standard procedure in both minor and major lung surgeries in thoracic surgery operations. Although postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS is not as severe as that seen after thoracotomy, it still occurs. This, in turn, affects postoperative pulmonary complications and patients\' lengths of hospital stay. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is still considered the gold standard in the treatment of postoperative pain. However, due to side effects such as post-procedural hypotension, urinary retention, or nausea/vomiting, alternative analgesic methods such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), intercostal block, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) are being considered instead of epidural analgesia. Among these methods, TPVB performed under ultrasound guidance is already a commonly preferred and classical method. In patients undergoing thoracotomy and VATS, Tulgar and colleagues have defined SPSIPB as a new technique and demonstrated its efficacy in providing analgesia in the hemithorax when considering the sensory dermatome of SPSIPB in a cadaveric and a case series study with five patients conducted in 2023. Similarly, Avcı and colleagues, in their article published in 2023, emphasized the analgesic effectiveness of SPSIPB in the thoracic region after VATS. As far as we know, there is no published study comparing TPVB and SPSIPB under ultrasound guidance to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided TPVB and SPSIPB in postoperative analgesia after VATS. Our primary goal is to investigate whether there are any superiority in terms of postoperative Visual analog score (VAS), time to first rescue analgesia, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) score, and complications, and to determine which one is more effective.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 29, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 31, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 20, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

thoracic paravertebral blockVATSserratus posterior superior interkostal plane block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperatative Pain

    Evaluation of patients' post-operative pain levels

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Group T

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group T patients who underwent TPVB

Procedure: Group T

Group S

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group S patients who underwent SPSIPB

Procedure: Group T

Interventions

Group TPROCEDURE

SPSIPB Technique: The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up. TPVB Technique: The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.

Also known as: Group S
Group SGroup T

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A minimum of 70 patients who will undergo VATS surgery,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification 1-2-3,
  • Aged between 18-65,
  • Who have read and accepted the voluntary informed consent form,
  • Body mass index (BMI) of \<35.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study,
  • BMI \>35,
  • ASA physical classifications 4-5,
  • Patients unable to perform pain scoring using the NRS system,
  • Those allergic to the administered local anesthetic and designated analgesic medication, individuals declaring pregnancy or lactation,
  • Patients under 18 or over 65 years of age,
  • Uncontrollable anxiety,
  • Alcohol and drug addiction,
  • Neuromuscular and peripheral nerve diseases,
  • Using high doses of opioid medication three days before surgery,
  • Widespread chronic pain,
  • Diabetes mellitus,
  • Hepatic and renal insufficiency,
  • Coagulation disorders,
  • Using anticoagulant drugs,
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hitit university

Çorum, Çorum, 19100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Sensitivity Training Groups

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Psychotherapy, GroupSocioenvironmental TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Guvenc Dogan, MD

    Hitit Universirty

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: SPSIPB Technique: The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up. TPVB Technique: The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2023

First Posted

January 23, 2024

Study Start

January 31, 2024

Primary Completion

May 20, 2024

Study Completion

August 15, 2024

Last Updated

January 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

not necessary

Locations