Implementation of Bright Light Therapy ID
Alleviation of Depressive Symptoms in People With Intellectual Disabilities
2 other identifiers
observational
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) have depressive symptoms, which negatively impact their quality of life. A lot of of the non-medicinal forms of treatment are not or hardly suitable for people with ID. Bright light therapy (BLT) seems to be a good option. Earlier research has shown that BLT is applicable in this group and seems promising in terms of reducing depressive symptoms, without serious side effects. In part 1 of this project we investigate the implementation of BLT at Amarant. We will take the lessons learned into part 2 of this project: the implementation of BLT at Abrona. We will evaluate this process and the outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedSeptember 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.1 years
September 8, 2023
September 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
acceptability
Acceptability (Proctor et al., 2011) is the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. This will be measured by interviews.
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
appropriateness
Appropriateness (Proctor et al., 2011) is the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer; and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. This will be measured by interviews.
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
feasibility of the intervention
Feasibility (Proctor et al., 2011) is defined as the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. This will be measured by interviews.
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
fidelity
Fidelity (Proctor et al., 2011) is defined as the degree to which an intervention was implemented as it was prescribed in the original protocol or as it was intended by the program developers. This will be measured by interviews and by case report study.
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
strategies
Implementation strategies are methods to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of a policy or intervention. This will be studied with interview data and logs.
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
Determinants
Barriers and facilitators to BLT, measured by interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR, Damschroder et al., 2009)
three times during study, 3-4 months in between
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Depressive symptoms
1 year
Behaviour
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Persons involved in BLT
Persons with ID and staff who are involved in BLT. Either by receiving BLT, or by prescribing or facitating BLT.
Interventions
for 2 weeks the patient will take place for a 10.000lux lamp for 20-30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
* Patients are adult with an intellectual disability who have received BLT for their depressive symptoms. * Staff are adults (without ID) who work for one of the two care organizations and who are involved in the implementation or prescription or facilitation of BLT.
You may qualify if:
- Involved in the implementation of BLT (staff) OR
- Involved in the prescription or application of BLT (staff/relatives) OR
- receiving BLT for their depressive symptoms (patients with ID)
- years or older
- informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- n/a
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ErasmusMC
Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Coordinator Quality
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2023
First Posted
January 22, 2024
Study Start
October 18, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09