NCT06212219

Brief Summary

Neurofeedback (NF) is a procedure for providing direct sensory feedback (in the form of visual, auditory or tactile stimulation) to a patient about their brain activity when performing a cognitive or motor task. This NF aims to allow the patient to become aware of this brain activity and thus learn to modulate it voluntarily in order to improve the performance obtained on the task. The aim of the study is to compare a "standard NF" procedure to a "personalized NF" procedure designed to optimize the level of patient acceptability based on the results obtained through these questionnaires.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 8, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

January 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Neurofeedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The delta Δ measured (post- versus pre-training) by the Fugl-Meyer test of the upper limb between the 2 groups

    Two measurements will be carried out pre- and two measurements post-, making four measurements in total in each group. For pre- and post-comparisons, we will use the averages of these measurements (pre-average vs post-training average), after three weeks of rehabilitation (15 sessions).

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Delta Δ (post- versus pre-training) on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire compared between the 2 groups.

    18 months

  • Delta Δ (post- and pre-training) in the acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT) compared between the 2 groups.

    18 months

  • The difference in the scores of the two groups on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire post-training.

    18 months

  • Evolution of NASA-TLX questionnaire scores during the sessions, for both groups.

    18 months

  • Evolution of feeling VAS scores at each session, for both groups

    18 months

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard Neurofeedback Procedure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard NF (sensory feedback) will consist of motor imagery tasks, that is to say that the patient will have to imagine themselves carrying out movements, without real motor execution. Two types of movements will be alternately requested: a complete sustained extension of the fingers of the paralyzed hand, a global movement of the arm (e.g. opening of the elbow) of the paralyzed arm.

Behavioral: Neurofeedback procedureOther: Fugl-Meyer testOther: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaireOther: Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleOther: State Anxiety Inventory scoresOther: Acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT)Other: System Usability Scale questionnaireOther: NASA Task Load Index questionnaireOther: Agency testOther: Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery QuestionnaireOther: Technology Locus of Control Assessment QuestionnaireOther: POSITIVE AFFECTIVITY AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY SCALEOther: Self-questionnaire: OCEAN of the five major factors of per- sound (or Big Five model)Other: Feeling VAS scoresOther: Reaching Performance Scale

Personalized Neurofeedback Procedure

EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a virtual companion to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress) , of the virtual environment.

Behavioral: Neurofeedback procedureOther: Fugl-Meyer testOther: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaireOther: Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleOther: State Anxiety Inventory scoresOther: Acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT)Other: System Usability Scale questionnaireOther: NASA Task Load Index questionnaireOther: Agency testOther: Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery QuestionnaireOther: Technology Locus of Control Assessment QuestionnaireOther: POSITIVE AFFECTIVITY AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY SCALEOther: Self-questionnaire: OCEAN of the five major factors of per- sound (or Big Five model)Other: Feeling VAS scoresOther: Reaching Performance Scale

Interventions

Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a companion is to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress.), of the virtual environment.

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

419 / 5 000 Résultats de traduction Résultat de traduction This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This psychometric motivation questionnaire offers the patient words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposition they can respond between rather positive (maximum) or rather negative (minimum)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of anxiety and depression. Concerning anxiety, to each proposition, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (never/not at all) and 3 at maximum (very often) and about depression, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (often, always) and 3 at maximum (never/not at all) The patient can calculate his score at the end

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This questionnaire measures the patient's anxiety at a given time. It features a number of statements that people have previously used to describe themselves. For each statement, choose a "grade" from 1 (not at all) to 4 (Very much)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This questionnaire asks the patient about their level of acceptability of NF training using words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposal they can respond on their feelings regarding the proposals.

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This questionnaire evaluates the usability of personalized NF procedures compared to standard procedures. To each statement, the patient can respond between a minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and a maximum of 5 (totally agree).

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This scale assesses psychological validity from the perspective of mental workload. 6 words are offered to the patient about his mental load and he can respond at least "little" and at maximum "A lot"

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

Questionnaire in which statements referring to the patient's general feeling and/or beliefs are presented. the patient has the choice between completely disagree (minimum) and totally agree (maximum)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

The aim of this questionnaire is to obtain an index of individuals' ability to mentally represent different movements. Different movements to imagine are indicated and the patient responds based on their ability to imagine the movement. He has the choice between "as clear as a film" (maximum) and "no image" (minimum)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

The questionnaire focuses on patients' opinions on problems related to the use of technical devices. It presents twelve statements that the patient can affirm or deny, depending on their personal point of view. The patient can respond at least "disagree at all" and at maximum "agree completely"

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This scale is made up of a list of words that indicate certain emotions or feelings. The patient must carefully read each of these words and spontaneously indicate at what level he feels this way at the time he responds to this scale. To do this, he can answer at least "Very little or not at all" and at maximum "A lot"

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

The model for measuring personality factors is the Anglo-Saxon model known as the "Big Five" or OCEAN in French. It measures 5 major personality traits: openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. The OCEAN questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire to be given to a person who wishes to evaluate themselves. It includes 45 items presented in the table below. For each item, patients have 5 response possibilities numbered from 1 to 5: 1 for "strongly disapproves" and 5 for "strongly approves". The patient can calculate his score at the end

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

The EVA scale relates to the patient's personal feelings: perceived difficulty, perceived fatigue, perceived ease of learning, level of embodiment, Relevance, Demonstrability of results, Fun aspect, Benefit/risk ratio, Self-efficacy. For each statement, the patient can respond on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (minimum) to "totally agree" (maximum).

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

This scale analyzes the evolution of speed, precision and range of movement using motion capture tools. For each statement, the patient has a rating between 0 (corresponds to not possible) and 3 (corresponds to entirely possible)

Personalized Neurofeedback ProcedureStandard Neurofeedback Procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Man, woman, over 18 years old
  • Motor deficit of the upper limb type of hemiplegia, secondary to a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke authenticated by brain imaging (MRI or CT)
  • Post-stroke patients in the subacute phase, between 15 days and 6 months after the stroke
  • Correct or corrected vision allowing reading at a distance of 0 to 2m
  • Ability to maintain a seated position for 1 hour
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
  • Informed patient having signed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Minors (age \< 18 years)
  • Phasic disorder limiting comprehension corresponding to a Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) score \< 4
  • Attentional disorder not allowing sufficient attention to be maintained for 1 hour
  • History of known stroke with motor sequelae.
  • Known peripheral neurological pathology affecting the paretic upper limb.
  • Other known central neurological pathology
  • Factors hindering EEG acquisition (scalp pathology, abnormal cervico-cephalic movements, cranial metal implants)
  • Unstabilized epilepsy
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding patient

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de TOULOUSE

Toulouse, 31000, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

4-amino-4'-hydroxylaminodiphenylsulfone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • GASQ David, MD

    University Hospital, Toulouse

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2024

First Posted

January 18, 2024

Study Start

January 8, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

January 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations