Neurofeedback-EEG Rehabilitation Protocol on Motor Recovery in the Subacute Phase Post-stroke (CUSTOM-NF-STROKE)
Impact of Personalization of a Neurofeedback-EEG Rehabilitation Protocol on Motor Recovery in the Subacute Phase Post-stroke (CUSTOM-NF-STROKE)
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neurofeedback (NF) is a procedure for providing direct sensory feedback (in the form of visual, auditory or tactile stimulation) to a patient about their brain activity when performing a cognitive or motor task. This NF aims to allow the patient to become aware of this brain activity and thus learn to modulate it voluntarily in order to improve the performance obtained on the task. The aim of the study is to compare a "standard NF" procedure to a "personalized NF" procedure designed to optimize the level of patient acceptability based on the results obtained through these questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 18, 2024
January 1, 2024
2 years
January 8, 2024
January 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The delta Δ measured (post- versus pre-training) by the Fugl-Meyer test of the upper limb between the 2 groups
Two measurements will be carried out pre- and two measurements post-, making four measurements in total in each group. For pre- and post-comparisons, we will use the averages of these measurements (pre-average vs post-training average), after three weeks of rehabilitation (15 sessions).
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Delta Δ (post- versus pre-training) on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire compared between the 2 groups.
18 months
Delta Δ (post- and pre-training) in the acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT) compared between the 2 groups.
18 months
The difference in the scores of the two groups on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire post-training.
18 months
Evolution of NASA-TLX questionnaire scores during the sessions, for both groups.
18 months
Evolution of feeling VAS scores at each session, for both groups
18 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Neurofeedback Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard NF (sensory feedback) will consist of motor imagery tasks, that is to say that the patient will have to imagine themselves carrying out movements, without real motor execution. Two types of movements will be alternately requested: a complete sustained extension of the fingers of the paralyzed hand, a global movement of the arm (e.g. opening of the elbow) of the paralyzed arm.
Personalized Neurofeedback Procedure
EXPERIMENTALPersonalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a virtual companion to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress) , of the virtual environment.
Interventions
Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a companion is to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress.), of the virtual environment.
419 / 5 000 Résultats de traduction Résultat de traduction This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum)
This psychometric motivation questionnaire offers the patient words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposition they can respond between rather positive (maximum) or rather negative (minimum)
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of anxiety and depression. Concerning anxiety, to each proposition, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (never/not at all) and 3 at maximum (very often) and about depression, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (often, always) and 3 at maximum (never/not at all) The patient can calculate his score at the end
This questionnaire measures the patient's anxiety at a given time. It features a number of statements that people have previously used to describe themselves. For each statement, choose a "grade" from 1 (not at all) to 4 (Very much)
This questionnaire asks the patient about their level of acceptability of NF training using words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposal they can respond on their feelings regarding the proposals.
This questionnaire evaluates the usability of personalized NF procedures compared to standard procedures. To each statement, the patient can respond between a minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and a maximum of 5 (totally agree).
This scale assesses psychological validity from the perspective of mental workload. 6 words are offered to the patient about his mental load and he can respond at least "little" and at maximum "A lot"
Questionnaire in which statements referring to the patient's general feeling and/or beliefs are presented. the patient has the choice between completely disagree (minimum) and totally agree (maximum)
The aim of this questionnaire is to obtain an index of individuals' ability to mentally represent different movements. Different movements to imagine are indicated and the patient responds based on their ability to imagine the movement. He has the choice between "as clear as a film" (maximum) and "no image" (minimum)
The questionnaire focuses on patients' opinions on problems related to the use of technical devices. It presents twelve statements that the patient can affirm or deny, depending on their personal point of view. The patient can respond at least "disagree at all" and at maximum "agree completely"
This scale is made up of a list of words that indicate certain emotions or feelings. The patient must carefully read each of these words and spontaneously indicate at what level he feels this way at the time he responds to this scale. To do this, he can answer at least "Very little or not at all" and at maximum "A lot"
The model for measuring personality factors is the Anglo-Saxon model known as the "Big Five" or OCEAN in French. It measures 5 major personality traits: openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. The OCEAN questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire to be given to a person who wishes to evaluate themselves. It includes 45 items presented in the table below. For each item, patients have 5 response possibilities numbered from 1 to 5: 1 for "strongly disapproves" and 5 for "strongly approves". The patient can calculate his score at the end
The EVA scale relates to the patient's personal feelings: perceived difficulty, perceived fatigue, perceived ease of learning, level of embodiment, Relevance, Demonstrability of results, Fun aspect, Benefit/risk ratio, Self-efficacy. For each statement, the patient can respond on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (minimum) to "totally agree" (maximum).
This scale analyzes the evolution of speed, precision and range of movement using motion capture tools. For each statement, the patient has a rating between 0 (corresponds to not possible) and 3 (corresponds to entirely possible)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Man, woman, over 18 years old
- Motor deficit of the upper limb type of hemiplegia, secondary to a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke authenticated by brain imaging (MRI or CT)
- Post-stroke patients in the subacute phase, between 15 days and 6 months after the stroke
- Correct or corrected vision allowing reading at a distance of 0 to 2m
- Ability to maintain a seated position for 1 hour
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
- Informed patient having signed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Minors (age \< 18 years)
- Phasic disorder limiting comprehension corresponding to a Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) score \< 4
- Attentional disorder not allowing sufficient attention to be maintained for 1 hour
- History of known stroke with motor sequelae.
- Known peripheral neurological pathology affecting the paretic upper limb.
- Other known central neurological pathology
- Factors hindering EEG acquisition (scalp pathology, abnormal cervico-cephalic movements, cranial metal implants)
- Unstabilized epilepsy
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de TOULOUSE
Toulouse, 31000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
GASQ David, MD
University Hospital, Toulouse
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2024
First Posted
January 18, 2024
Study Start
January 8, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
January 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share