NCT06205654

Brief Summary

Elderly with dementia living in residential care homes often have limited access to adequate lighting (daylight). Light can however positively impact the individual on a number of factors, including sleep quality and mental health. The proposed non-invasive study seeks to evaluate the impact of an improved lighting environment in the living areas of residential care home residents with dementia on both the physical and mental well-being of these individuals. To assess sleep quality, an actigraphy device will be used from which a number of parameters corresponding to sleep quality can be obtained. Mental health/behaviour of the participants will be assessed by validated questionnaires. These questionnaires will be filled for each participant independently by 2 members of the nursing staff. Two groups of residential care home residents will be observed during this study: an intervention group and a control group. In the intervention group, innovative lighting designs are already implemented in the living area. The control group will experience no significant modifications to their lighting conditions. Extra luminaires (floor lamp/table lamp) will be employed without significantly improving the light exposure during the day. It is hypothesized that the introduction of enhanced lighting during the day in the living area of the intervention group will result in improved sleep quality and enhanced mental well-being.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 9, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 3, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

January 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

LightingIntegrative lightingDementiaNursing homeResidential care home

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Change from Baseline in sleep efficiency at Week 15

    Sleep efficiency is the actual sleep time expressed as a percentage of time in bed as measured by actigraphy. Higher percentage indicates better sleep efficiency. Change = percentage point difference between Baseline and Week 15

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in Fragmentation Index at Week 15

    The Fragmentation Index is an indication of the degree of fragmentation of the sleep period, and can be used as an indication of sleep quality. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 Fragmentation Index - Baseline Fragmentation Index)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in interdaily stability at Week 15

    Interdaily stability quantifies the degree of regularity in the activity-rest pattern. Range of 0 to 1 where a value of 0 indicates a total lack of rhythm and a value of 1 indicates a perfectly stable rhythm. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 Interdaily stability - Baseline Interdaily stability)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in Intradaily variability at Week 15

    Intradaily variability quantifies the degree of fragmentation of activity-rest periods. The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2 with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Typical values for healthy subjects will be below 1. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 Intradaily variability - Baseline Intradaily variability)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in L5 average at Week 15

    L5 average provides the average activity level for the sequence of the least five active hours.This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 L5 average - Baseline L5 average)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in M10 average at Week 15

    M10 average provides the average activity level for the sequence of the highest (most) ten active hours. This value provides an indication of how active and regular the wake periods are. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 M10 average - Baseline M10 average)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in number of naps at Week 15

    Average number of naps during the day. More naps during the day indicate poorer sleep patterns. This parameter is measured using actigraphy. Change = (Week 15 number of naps - Baseline number of naps)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in agitation on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory at Week 15

    The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory is used to assess agitation. It consists of 29 items regarding the manifestation of physically aggressive, physically non-aggressive and verbally agitated behaviors which are scored on a 7-point scale ranging from "Never" to "Several times per hour". The questionnaire is completed for each participant independently by 2 members of the nursing staff. Change = (Week 15 score - Baseline score)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in depression on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia at Week 15

    The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia is used to assess symptoms of depression in participants with dementia. It consists of different items where each item is rated for severity on a scale of 0-2 (0=absent, 1=mild or intermittent, 2=severe). The item scores are added. Scores above 10 indicate a probable major depression. Scores above 18 indicate a definite major depression. Scores below 6 as a rule are associated with absence of significant depressive symptoms. The questionnaire is completed for each participant independently by 2 members of the nursing staff. Change = (Week 15 score - Baseline score)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in pain on the Doloplus Scale-2 at Week 15

    The Doloplus Scale-2 is used to assess pain and the impact of pain. The items are rated for severity on a scale of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=almost always present). The questionnaire is completed for each participant independently by 2 members of the nursing staff. Change = (Week 15 score - Baseline score)

    Baseline + Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in neuropsychiatric symptoms on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory at Week 15

    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is used to assess a broad spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms, including hallucinations, delusions, and anxiety. The NPI examines 12 sub-domains of behavioral functioning: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor activity, night-time behavioral disturbances, and appetite and eating abnormalities The questionnaire is completed for each participant independently by 2 members of the nursing staff. Change = (Week 15 score - Baseline score)

    Baseline + Week 15

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Age of participant

    Baseline measurement

  • Gender of participant

    Baseline measurement

  • Length of stay in the nursing home of participant

    Baseline measurement

  • Marital status of participant

    Baseline measurement

  • Frequency of visitors of participant

    Baseline measurement

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

innovative lighting designs are implemented in the living area.

Control

no significant modifications to their lighting conditions are implemented in the living area

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Two residential care homes are participating in this study. In one residential care home, improved lighting was implemented in two living rooms. The intervention group consists of participants living in one of these living rooms. The control group consists of participants living in the other residential care home (where improved lighting was not implemented).

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with dementia
  • Residing in the selected living area

You may not qualify if:

  • Blind individuals
  • Not residing in the selected living area
  • Not diagnosed with dementia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Curando vzw

Wingene, West-Vlaanderen, 8755, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2024

First Posted

January 16, 2024

Study Start

September 9, 2024

Primary Completion

February 3, 2025

Study Completion

February 10, 2025

Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations