NCT06199414

Brief Summary

Single center, retrospective review study comparing Figure of Eight suture to LockeT, enrolling approximately 70 patients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 29, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 29, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Effectiveness of LockeT device - Time to no oozing/hemostasis

    To assess the effectiveness of using LockeT to retain sutures and pressure to gain hemostasis after venous procedures. Time to no oozing/hemostasis (mins/hours)

    1 week

  • Effectiveness of LockeT device - Time to Ambulate

    To assess the effectiveness of using LockeT to retain sutures and pressure to gain hemostasis after venous procedures. Time to no oozing/hemostasis (mins/hours)

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

Subjects with Figure-of-eight (F-8) suture

This is the group of subjects for whom Figure-of-eight (F-8) suture is used for their venous closure.

Device: Venous Closure

Subjects with LockeT Device

This is the group of subjects for whom LockeT device is used for their venous closure.

Device: Venous Closure

Interventions

Vascular closure to achieve vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths in catheter ablation procedures

Subjects with Figure-of-eight (F-8) sutureSubjects with LockeT Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will include who underwent AF ablation and required F-8 or LockeT post procedure.

You may qualify if:

  • All participants must meet the following criteria to be included in this study.
  • Subjects must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Subjects underwent Atrial Fibrillation radiofrequency ablation procedure.
  • Subjects must have undergone F-8 or LockeT for venous closure.

You may not qualify if:

  • If a subject meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study participation.
  • Subjects under the age of 18.
  • Subject's electrophysiology procedure is not planned to access the left atrium or ventricle.
  • Subjects in which F-8 or a LockeT was not used.
  • If the EP physician detected a formed hematoma prior to venous closure, that patient will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute - Roe Clinic

Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, United States

Location

Overland Park Regional Medical Center

Overland Park, Kansas, 66215, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, Mittal S, Al-Ahmad A, De Lurgio DB, Horton R, Spear W, Bailey S, Bunch J, Musat D, O'Neill P, Compton S, Turakhia MP; AMBULATE Trial Investigators. Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures: The AMBULATE Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;6(1):111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

    PMID: 31971899BACKGROUND
  • Mujer MT, Al-Abcha A, Flores J, Saleh Y, Robinson P. A comparison of figure-of-8-suture versus manual compression for venous access closure after cardiac procedures: An updated meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):856-865. doi: 10.1111/pace.14008. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

    PMID: 32638389BACKGROUND
  • Atti V, Turagam MK, Garg J, Alratroot A, Abela GS, Rayamajhi S, Lakkireddy D. Efficacy and safety of figure-of-eight suture versus manual pressure for venous access closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;57(3):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00547-6. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

    PMID: 31001767BACKGROUND
  • Jensen CJ, Schnur M, Lask S, Attanasio P, Gotzmann M, Kara K, Hanefeld C, Mugge A, Wutzler A. Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All? Int J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):965-969. doi: 10.7150/ijms.42593. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32308550BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD

    Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Donita Atkins

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2023

First Posted

January 10, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-12

Locations