Suction Cervical Stabilizer Compared to Standard Tenaculum for Intrauterine Procedures
Safety and Efficacy of a Suction Cervical Stabilizer Compared to the Standard Tenaculum for Intrauterine Procedures in the Clinic Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate patient-reported pain, bleeding, and device efficiency along with provider satisfaction and ease of use between intrauterine procedures employing a suction cervical stabilizer (new device, FDA approved, atraumatic) or single-tooth tenaculum (standard, traumatic). This device, cleared by the FDA in 2023, was studied in Europe and showed pain reduced by up to 73% and bleeding reduced by 78% compared to the single-tooth tenaculum for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. The investigators seek to study this device in the United States, and trial it among all intrauterine procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2025
CompletedJune 10, 2025
May 1, 2025
5 months
December 4, 2023
April 15, 2025
May 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient-perceived Pain
Patients will be asked to rate their pain using the Numeric Rating Scale, a pain screening tool commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable". Participants fill out their survey once the procedure and clinical appointment is concluded.
Immediately after intrauterine procedure and scheduled appointment is complete (approx. 5-10 minutes after procedure completion)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Provider-perceived Bleeding
Immediately after intrauterine procedure and scheduled appointment is complete (approx. 5-10 minutes after procedure completion)
Provider-perceived Ease of Use
Immediately after intrauterine procedure and scheduled appointment is complete (approx. 5-10 minutes after procedure completion)
Provider-perceived Satisfaction
Immediately after intrauterine procedure and scheduled appointment is complete (approx. 5-10 minutes after procedure completion)
Study Arms (2)
Carevix
EXPERIMENTALsuction cervical stabilizer utilized for intrauterine procedures
Tenaculum
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard of care cervical stabilization device
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Speaks and reads in English
- Able to consent on their own
- Will undergo any intrauterine procedure using the Carevix (for exposure group) or using Tenaculum (for Control Group)
- Cervix at least 26 mm in diameter
- Twenty providers performing this procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Vaginal bleeding of unknown origin
- Cervix less than 26 mm in diameter
- Nabothian cyst on anterior lip of cervix
- Cervical myomas
- Cervical abnormalities
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Yaron M, Legardeur H, Barcellini B, Akhoundova F, Mathevet P. Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: Results from a randomized, controlled study. Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110004. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110004. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
PMID: 36914147BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Not all clinic providers wanted to participate in the trial which hindered recruitment. Similarly, not all providers consistently utilized ANY cervical stabilization which rendered otherwise eligible participants unable to continue in the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Alissa M Conklin
- Organization
- Indiana University Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alissa Conklin, MD
Indiana University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2023
First Posted
January 5, 2024
Study Start
November 9, 2023
Primary Completion
April 15, 2024
Study Completion
April 15, 2024
Last Updated
June 10, 2025
Results First Posted
June 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share