NCT01506778

Brief Summary

Most of gynecological office procedure such as endometrial sampling procedure, hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy, insertion of contraceptive intrauterine device, difficult intrauterine insemination or embryo transfer procedures often require the application of a single tooth tenaculum to the cervix for steady the cervix, straighten the cervicouterine angle and provide countertraction. However, grasping the cervix with a tenaculum can be a painful experience for the patient.A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate using of tenaculum on pain perception of the patients and the procedure performance of the surgeons in endometrial sampling procedure(ESP) with pipelle.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2012

Status Verified

January 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Endometrial Sampling ProcedureLikert ScalaPipelleTenaculumVisual Analog Pain Scala

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analog Scala for patient's pain perception

    VAS performed four times each patient.

    5 second

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Likert scala for procedure performance

    5 second

  • Success rate as adequate sampling of endometrial tissue for histopathologic diagnosis.

    5-10 day

Study Arms (2)

Group 1(With Tenaculum)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group consisted of the patients whose had been applied tenaculum at cervix during the endometrial sampling procedure

Device: Tenaculum

Group 2 (Without Tenaculum)

NO INTERVENTION

This group consisted of the patients whose had been not applied tenaculum during the endometrial sampling procedure.

Interventions

TenaculumDEVICE

Single tooth tenaculum are use to the cervix for steady the cervix, straighten the cervicouterine angle and provide countertraction. Most of gynecological office procedure such as endometrial sampling procedure, hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy, insertion of contraceptive intrauterine device, difficult intrauterine insemination or embryo transfer procedures often require the application of a tenaculum.

Group 1(With Tenaculum)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old
  • The women has required endometrial sampling procedure in gynecology outpatients clinic.
  • Who are capable understand the spoken words and describe the pain.

You may not qualify if:

  • Stenotic cervical canal
  • They had acute cervicitis
  • Intense anxiety
  • Need for coincident endocervical curettage
  • Need for general anesthesia or local anesthetics
  • The use of analgesic drug pre-procedure
  • Known history of malignancy
  • Uterine anomalies or leiomyomas that distort the cervical canal and cavity
  • A history of failed office endometrial sampling
  • Positive β-HCG test.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine

Adana, 01330, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Officials

  • Ahmet Baris Guzel, Assist Prof Dr.

    Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Aybala Kubat, MD

    Şahinbey Goverment Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ghanim Khatib, MD

    Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Fatma Tuncay Ozgunen, Prof Dr.

    Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ibrahim Ferhat Urunsak, Assist Prof Dr.

    Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Umran Kucukgoz Gulec, Assist Prof Dr.

    Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2012

First Posted

January 10, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 10, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-01

Locations