Evaluation of Advanced Imaging and Visualization for Clinical Deep Brain Stimulation
2 other identifiers
observational
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this project is to evaluate next generation visualization tools and surgical targeting models for clinical deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study will evaluate the performance of HoloDBS software in comparison to the current standard (SOC) clinical planning tools to prepare for DBS surgery. The investigators hypothesize that HoloDBS will provide more detailed and anatomically useful information to the neurosurgeon and neurologist than the current clinical standard. The study team reviews electronic medical records (EMR) from patients who are undergoing DBS surgery. There are no study visits involved in this study as only data from standard clinical care will be used. All study activities are executed by the study team and there are no interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 24, 2026
CompletedJuly 24, 2026
June 1, 2026
1.2 years
December 6, 2023
May 14, 2026
June 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distance Between the Actual Post-operative Location of the DBS Electrode and the Planned Location
Comparison of the post-operative position of the DBS electrode to the location that was defined in the standard-of-care plan and the HoloDBS plan. The distance was calculated for each hemisphere for each participant as the distance between the actual post-operative electrode location and the location defined in the SOC plan (indicated as SOC) and the distance between the actual post-operative electrode location and the location defined in the HoloDBS plan (indicated as HoloDBS).
1 month after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Physicians Who Reply 'Yes' to the Question, 'Was the Additional Data Available in the HoloDBS Application Valuable in Defining Your Theoretical Optimal Electrode Position?'
6 months and 1 year after study starts
Study Arms (2)
Surgery planning by SOC methods, then by HoloDBS
Standard-of-care (SOC) surgery plan is built before the HoloDBS hypothetical surgery plan
Surgery planning by HoloDBS, then by SOC methods
HoloDBS hypothetical surgery plan is built before the standard-of-care (SOC) surgery plan
Interventions
Use of SOC clinical planning tools to prepare for DBS (deep brain stimulation) surgery
Use of next generation visualization tools and surgical targeting models to hypothetically prepare for DBS (deep brain stimulation) surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with Parkinson's disease scheduled for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery
You may not qualify if:
- age 18 years and over
- meeting qualification for deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease with one or more of medication refractory tremor, motor fluctuations despite medication optimization, or levodopa responsiveness but limited by medication induced adverse effects (nausea, dystonia, dyskinesia for example).
- consideration of alternate diagnosis to Parkinson disease
- high risk medical comorbidities which would make the patient not a candidate for surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cameron McIntyre, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2023
First Posted
January 5, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 29, 2025
Study Completion
May 29, 2025
Last Updated
July 24, 2026
Results First Posted
July 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share