NCT05753449

Brief Summary

This is a study to evaluate Deep brain stimulation (DBS) burst-type electrical stimulation programming verses standard DBS programming. Burst-type DBS is defined as a novel stimulation protocol in which intermittent bursts of traditional high-frequency rectangular wave stimulation are delivered. Burst type DBS may improve the efficacy and durability of DBS pulse generator.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 24, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2023

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 21, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 28, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2023

Results QC Date

November 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Scores at Baseline (Visit 1)

    This outcome is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Score in the "Medication Off" state, after the first treatment (administered for 30 minutes) and after the second treatment (administered for 30 minutes). For example, the first treatment for patients in the arm "Baseline Programming First, Then Experimental Burst-type Programming" was baseline (or standard of care) DBS programming, and the second treatment was experimental Burst-style programming. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe, marked, or unable), with the total possible score for the 14 items, including separate questions regarding symptoms present axially and in appendages, ranging from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Baseline

  • Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Scores at Six Months (Visit 2)

    This outcomes is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Score in the "Medication Off" state and after burst-type DBS programming in the acute setting (after 30 minutes) at six months. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe, marked, or unable), with the total possible score for the 14 items, including separate questions regarding symptoms present axially and in appendages, ranging from 0 to 108. A higher score means a worse outcome. Note that the study arm titles refer to whether or not the patients were randomized to baseline programming or Burst-type programming at Visit 1. During this visit (Visit 2), all study subjects were to be evaluated in the medication-off state and then evaluated following 30 minutes of treatment with Burst-type programming. Treatment with baseline programming was not administered during this visit (Visit 2).

    6 months

  • Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Scores at Twelve Months (Visit 3)

    This outcomes is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) v-III Motor Examination Score in the "Medication Off" state and after burst-type DBS programming in the acute setting (after 30 minutes) at 12 months. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe, marked, or unable), with the total possible score for the 14 items, including separate questions regarding symptoms present axially and in appendages, ranging from 0 to 108. A higher score means a worse outcome. Note that the study arm titles refer to whether or not the patients were randomized to baseline programming or Burst-type programming at Visit 1. During this visit (Visit 2), all study subjects were to be evaluated in the medication-off state and then evaluated following 30 minutes of treatment with Burst-type programming. Treatment with baseline programming was not administered during this visit (Visit 2).

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Baseline Programming First, Then Experimental Burst-type Programming

EXPERIMENTAL

In this arm, patients were randomized to initially receive treatment with baseline DBS programming (standard of care) at Visit 1. After a 30 minute treatment period, patients were to undergo UPDRS III evaluation, a 15 minute washout period with the DBS turned off and then experimental Burst-type programming for 30 minutes. Finally, patients were to undergo UPDRS III evaluation after the second round of programming.

Device: Baseline (or standard of care) DBS programmingDevice: Burst-type DBS electrical stimulation programming

Experimental Burst-type Programming First, Then Baseline Programming

EXPERIMENTAL

In this arm, patients were randomized to initially receive treatment with experimental Burst-type DBS programming at Visit 1. After a 30 minute treatment period, patients were to undergo UPDRS III evaluation, a 15 minute washout period with the DBS turned off and then baseline programming (standard of care) for 30 minutes. Finally, patients were to undergo UPDRS III evaluation after the second round of programming. Burst-type DBS is defined as a novel stimulation protocol in which intermittent bursts of traditional high-frequency rectangular wave stimulation are delivered.

Device: Baseline (or standard of care) DBS programmingDevice: Burst-type DBS electrical stimulation programming

Interventions

Baseline (or standard of care) DBS programming.

Also known as: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation (BSN) Vercise™ System
Baseline Programming First, Then Experimental Burst-type ProgrammingExperimental Burst-type Programming First, Then Baseline Programming

Burst-type DBS is defined as a novel stimulation protocol in which intermittent bursts of traditional high-frequency rectangular wave stimulation are delivered.

Also known as: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation (BSN) Vercise™ System
Baseline Programming First, Then Experimental Burst-type ProgrammingExperimental Burst-type Programming First, Then Baseline Programming

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Bilateral DBS-STN (subthalamic nucleus) target for idiopathic Parkinson's disease implanted minimum 6 months prior to the day of study enrollment
  • Stable DBS programming settings and Parkinson's disease medications defined as no changes to either within past 2 weeks
  • Comfortable using DBS controller to turn off device prior to study visits
  • Able to provide informed consent and complete follow-up visits

You may not qualify if:

  • DBS technology other than Boston scientific Genus/Gevia
  • Unable to complete follow-up visits
  • DBS brain targets other than STN (subthalamic nucleus)
  • Signs of progressive cognitive decline

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AHN Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This study was terminated due to challenges in recruiting participants as reluctance of patients who have achieved successful outcomes with their DBS devices to participate. They are understandably hesitant to risk potential symptom worsening by altering their device settings, even for the purpose of research. One subject completed the trial and the second subject withdrew due to intolerance of the device settings. Both subjects were enrolled in the experimental arm of the trial.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Megan Hendricks, regulatory Specialist
Organization
Allegheny Health Network

Study Officials

  • Nestor Tomycz

    Allegheny Health Network AGH Department of Neuroscience

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Subjects will be programmed to both settings over the course of the visits, but the order is randomized to ensure appropriate blinding of the UPDRS assessor. Unblinded examiner will then turn the DBS ON to the patient's baseline DBS settings continuously ON or to burst DBS mode. A blinded examiner who did not perform the programming change will perform a UPDRS-III evaluation
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Randomized, double-blind cross-over study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Neurosurgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2023

First Posted

March 3, 2023

Study Start

August 24, 2022

Primary Completion

February 21, 2024

Study Completion

February 21, 2024

Last Updated

May 28, 2025

Results First Posted

May 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations