Validation of a Low-cost Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)
PRP
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Knee osteoarthritis is an extremely common and debilitating condition, more common in women, with an estimated global prevalence of 16%, and as high as 50% by the age of 80. Current management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) revolves around conservative treatments- biomechanical interventions, intra-articular injections, exercise, self-management and education, oral or topical medications, strength training, and weight management - or surgical management. For injection therapies, corticosteroids remain the standard of care; approximately 84% of sports medicine physicians perform these knee injections at least monthly, reporting a median range of 11-20 injections per month. Multiple detrimental effects of corticosteroid injections are well-known, including alterations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, blood glucose levels, bone turnover, inflammatory response, blood pressure, and psychologic well-being. Thus, alternative therapies are of the utmost importance. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is an injectable preparation of a patient's blood that can be used for numerous conditions and has received significant attention over the past several years for its potential application for the treatment of pain and functional impairment due to knee OA. Systematic reviews of randomized-controlled trials have demonstrated equivalent-to-superior treatment outcomes associated with the use of intra-articular PRP compared to placebo, hyaluronic acid, and corticosteroid. Furthermore, use of intra-articular PRP is associated with a very low rate of adverse events and is likely safer than injectable corticosteroids. Concerns that have limited a wider use of PRP include two main concerns - an uncertainty regarding the current evidence base due to study-related bias, heterogeneity, and lack of reporting standards; and second, more importantly, the main issue remains high cost.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2024
CompletedNovember 17, 2025
November 1, 2025
9 months
October 31, 2022
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary goal of this study is to validate our easy-to replicate LC-PRP preparation technique
The primary goal of this study is to validate the investigator(s) easy-to-replicate LC-PRP preparation technique to demonstrate that its composition is equivalent to standard, commercially-available PRP preparation kits. The investigators will specifically compare the quantity of platelets derived from their system compared to previously published platelet counts for commercially available PRP preparation kits.
24-Months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain and functional outcomes
24-Months
QOL outcomes
24-Months
Global impression of change
24-Months
Patient Satisfaction (GPS)
24-Months
Other Outcomes (3)
Cost-effectiveness
24-Months
Healthcare utilization
24-Months
Direct medical costs
24-Months
Study Arms (1)
Directly Address Two Concerns - Proper Reporting of PRP Composition and Greatly Decreasing Cost
OTHERAs socioeconomic inequity directly relates to disability related to knee Osteoarthritis (OA), limiting the cost of treatment is of the utmost importance to ensure appropriate delivery of care to all patients. As PRP is currently not covered by the vast majority of public and private payors, patients are required to pay for the injections out of pocket, with an average cost of $714 per injection (as high as $2,092). Furthermore, research studies relating to PRP are often expensive due to the cost of the traditional method of extracting PRP, generally with commercial kits, and thus limited in scope. The investigators have developed and implemented a low-cost PRP (LC-PRP) preparation technique and have safely performed the injections on hundreds of patients with knee OA.
Interventions
Blood Collection 45mL, Processed Neutrophil-Poor PRP, 2 Injections at day 0 and 3 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of any adult age with symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) score 1-3 knee OA, based on radiographs within the last six months.
- Patients must have failed at least six weeks of conventional conservative treatments (such as medication or physical therapy).
- Patients with bilateral knee OA will only be eligible if both knees fit the criteria; each knee will count separately.
You may not qualify if:
- Recent (last two years) knee surgery,
- Prior orthobiologic injection(s) into the knee,
- Known major axial deviation (over 30 degrees)
- Known thrombocytopenia (platelets under 50,000), thrombocythemia (platelets over 1,000,000), known platelet disorder (ITP, TTP, or Lowe syndrome)
- Active systemic infection requiring antibiotics, or local infection at the site of injection,
- Non-ambulatory patients,
- Patients seeking care with active litigation pending
- Body mass index (BMI) over 40
- Injection into the affected joint within the last six months
- Oral steroids consumed within the last three months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah Orthopedic Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
Related Publications (4)
Chu J, Duan W, Yu Z, Tao T, Xu J, Ma Q, Zhao L, Guo JJ. Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma decrease pain and improve functional outcomes than sham saline in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Dec;30(12):4063-4071. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06887-7. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
PMID: 35124707BACKGROUNDDai WL, Zhou AG, Zhang H, Zhang J. Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar;33(3):659-670.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
PMID: 28012636BACKGROUNDChu CR, Rodeo S, Bhutani N, Goodrich LR, Huard J, Irrgang J, LaPrade RF, Lattermann C, Lu Y, Mandelbaum B, Mao J, McIntyre L, Mishra A, Muschler GF, Piuzzi NS, Potter H, Spindler K, Tokish JM, Tuan R, Zaslav K, Maloney W. Optimizing Clinical Use of Biologics in Orthopaedic Surgery: Consensus Recommendations From the 2018 AAOS/NIH U-13 Conference. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Jan 15;27(2):e50-e63. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00305.
PMID: 30300216BACKGROUNDBelk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Houck DA, Goodrich JA, Dragoo JL, McCarty EC. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;49(1):249-260. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909397. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
PMID: 32302218BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Cushman, MD
University of Utah Orthopedic Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2022
First Posted
December 28, 2023
Study Start
September 15, 2023
Primary Completion
June 15, 2024
Study Completion
October 10, 2024
Last Updated
November 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share