Personalized Perioperative Care Based on Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
SUPPORT
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the perioperative setting, Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) are important for both patients and clinicians. Reliable PROMs, like the Quality Of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, are available for patients experiencing surgery. These PROMs are significantly used as endoints for clinical interventions assessment. These PROMs may also be considered to monitor and assess patient health status as part of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. However data about the efficacy of PROMs-based perioperative clinical follow up are lacking. The clinical hypothesis is that a PROMs (QoR-15) based perioperative clinical care is more efficient that the usual care non based on the QoR-15.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable surgery
Started Apr 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 23, 2025
CompletedMay 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.8 years
April 6, 2023
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative follow-up integrating the patient's point of view in osteoarticular surgery compared to a classic postoperative management
Evolution of a modified version of the French Quality-Of-Recovery 15 score (QoR-15f) between the intraoperative consultation and D35 postoperative
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Describe postoperative functional recovery after osteoarticular surgery
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Describe the consequences of a perioperative follow-up that integrates the patient's point of view on the patient pathway
Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35
Evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative monitoring that incorporates the patient's perspective on reducing postoperative opioid use
Day 35
Evaluate the safety
Inclusion (Day 0), Day 1, Day 3, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 35]
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group: OPTIMISTIC follow-up
EXPERIMENTALfollow-up by nurses specialized in collecting the patient's point of view concerning his or her state of health, in addition to the usual conventional follow-up according to routine care directive interviews carried out preoperatively and at Days 1, 3, 14 and 28 postoperatively (modified QoR-15f score, PROMS...)
Control group: Usual conventional follow-up
ACTIVE COMPARATORusual conventional follow-up according to routine care (modified QoR-15f score will be administered to all patients at visit 0 and Day 35).
Interventions
follow-up by nurses specialized in collecting the patient's point of view concerning his or her state of health, in addition to the usual conventional follow-up according to routine care directive interviews carried out preoperatively and at Days 1, 3, 14 and 28 postoperatively (modified QoR-15f score, PROMS...)
usual conventional follow-up according to routine care (modified QoR-15f score will be administered to all patients at visit 0 and Day 35).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult patient
- Benefiting from an osteo-articular surgery
- Subject affiliated to a social health insurance plan
- Able to understand the objectives and risks of the research and to give a dated and signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to administer the QoR-15f questionnaire (cognitive impairment, language barrier)
- Subject under court protection
- Subject under guardianship or curatorship
- Patient whose rehabilitation will be performed in a secondary hospital
- Patient having already benefited from a previous follow-up by the OPTIMISTE team
- Patient included in a therapeutic trial that may impact postoperative quality of recovery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
EBER Manon
Strasbourg, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
EBER Manon, Mme
CHRU Strasbourg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2023
First Posted
December 26, 2023
Study Start
April 14, 2023
Primary Completion
January 23, 2025
Study Completion
January 23, 2025
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share