Effect of Emdogain® on Soft Tissue Wound Healing
Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain®) on Soft Tissue Wound Healing Following Surgical Crown Lengthening Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized, controlled, single-center study is to compare the effects of Emdogain®, a regenerative biomaterial, on post-operative pain, wound healing and inflammation of treated sites after surgical crown lengthening. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the use of Emdogain® in conjunction with crown lengthening surgery improve post-operative soft-tissue healing, decrease inflammation and reduce patient perception of pain compared to crown lengthening without addition of Emdogain®? The treatment group will receive Emdogain® during surgery, and the control group will undergo standard crown lengthening without Emdogain®.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2023
CompletedDecember 21, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.6 years
December 11, 2023
December 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Clinician-reported degree of inflammation
Presence and degree of inflammation (appearance of erythema/edema) using VAS score
One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups
Clinician-reported quality of healing
Overall healing using VAS score
One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups
Patient-reported perception of pain
Pain score using VAS
One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups
Patient-reported swelling
Swelling score using VAS
One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of analgesics
One, two, four and eight-week follow-ups
Study Arms (2)
Treatment/experimental group
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing surgical crown lengthening of a single site with application of PrefGel® + Emdogain®
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients undergoing surgical crown lengthening of a single site with application of PrefGel® only
Interventions
Surgical crown lengthening procedure with root conditioning with 24% EDTA (PrefGel®) and application of 0.3 mL Emdogain® to root surface with 27-gauge needle
Surgical crown lengthening procedure with root conditioning with 24% EDTA (PrefGel®)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who:
- Were capable and willing to provide consent and complete treatment as well as follow-up appointments
- Were over the age of 18 years old
- Required surgical crown lengthening for functional reasons as outlined in background
- Had no contraindications to surgery (these include periodontal contraindications to crown lengthening such as poor crown-to-root ratio, furcation exposure or esthetic concerns)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who were unable to provide informed consent
- Pregnant women
- Women receiving estrogen therapy
- Patients who had received systemic antibiotics within the past 6 months
- Patients with severe systemic disease (ASA 3+) including: poorly controlled diabetes, blood dyscrasias, liver disease, immunosuppressive disorders, malignancy or who have had previous radiotherapy
- Patients with untreated, active periodontal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amir Azarpazhoohlead
- Institut Straumann AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1G6, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howard Tenenbaum, Dr
University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All participants remained blinded with respect to their group assignment for the duration of the study. Allocation concealment was done by placing randomization codes with group assignment in opaque sealed envelopes that were opened by the operator at the end of the surgical procedure, right before suturing, which means the surgeon was blinded throughout most of the treatment. Data was collected by a separate examiner who was also blinded to treatment allocation. Data analysis was carried out by an external statistician, minimizing the risk of bias.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2023
First Posted
December 21, 2023
Study Start
April 8, 2019
Primary Completion
November 9, 2020
Study Completion
October 11, 2021
Last Updated
December 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share