NCT04235010

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effects of genius toothbrushes on periodontal status of patients during fixed orthodontic treatment.Half of the patients received manual orthodontic toothbrushes (Oral B Ortho, Procter \& Gamble, USA) with V-shaped bristles and rounded ends. The others received genius orthodontic toothbrush (Oral B Genius 8900, Procter \& Gamble, USA) with Oral-B CrossAction brush head, Procter \& Gamble, USA).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 28, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2019

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 28, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

January 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Genius toothbrushOrthodontic treatmentPeriodontal health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Löe and Silness gingival index measurement

    A score from 0 to 3 is given. Grade 0 indicates normal gingiva; grade 1 mild inflammation with no bleeding; grade 2 moderate inflammation, erythema, swelling, bleeding on probing or when pressure applied; grade 3 severe inflammation, severe erythema and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous hemorrhage, some ulceration

    1 month

  • Löe and Silness gingival index measurement

    A score from 0 to 3 is given. Grade 0 indicates normal gingiva; grade 1 mild inflammation with no bleeding; grade 2 moderate inflammation, erythema, swelling, bleeding on probing or when pressure applied; grade 3 severe inflammation, severe erythema and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous hemorrhage, some ulceration

    2 months

  • Löe and Silness gingival index measurement

    A score from 0 to 3 is given. Grade 0 indicates normal gingiva; grade 1 mild inflammation with no bleeding; grade 2 moderate inflammation, erythema, swelling, bleeding on probing or when pressure applied; grade 3 severe inflammation, severe erythema and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous hemorrhage, some ulceration

    4 months

  • Modified Silness and Löe plaque index measurement

    The buccal surface of each tooth is divided into four zones (mesial, distal, gingival and incisal) to the bracket. Each of the four sites of the buccal tooth surface is given a score from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates the absence of plaque; 1 indicates no plaque visible, but an accumulation of soft deposit on a probe when used to clean the surface; 2 indicates a moderate accumulation of soft deposit on the tooth which can be seen with the naked eye; and 3 indicates an abundance of soft matter on the tooth. For the analysis, values are summed to obtain a total score per participant.

    1 month

  • Modified Silness and Löe plaque index measurement

    The buccal surface of each tooth is divided into four zones (mesial, distal, gingival and incisal) to the bracket. Each of the four sites of the buccal tooth surface is given a score from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates the absence of plaque; 1 indicates no plaque visible, but an accumulation of soft deposit on a probe when used to clean the surface; 2 indicates a moderate accumulation of soft deposit on the tooth which can be seen with the naked eye; and 3 indicates an abundance of soft matter on the tooth. For the analysis, values are summed to obtain a total score per participant.

    2 months

  • Modified Silness and Löe plaque index measurement

    The buccal surface of each tooth is divided into four zones (mesial, distal, gingival and incisal) to the bracket. Each of the four sites of the buccal tooth surface is given a score from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates the absence of plaque; 1 indicates no plaque visible, but an accumulation of soft deposit on a probe when used to clean the surface; 2 indicates a moderate accumulation of soft deposit on the tooth which can be seen with the naked eye; and 3 indicates an abundance of soft matter on the tooth. For the analysis, values are summed to obtain a total score per participant.

    4 months

  • Bleeding on probing scores

    A periodontal probe runs along the marginal gingiva at an angle of approximately 60° to the longitudinal axis of the tooth to determine whether probing elicited marginal bleeding (score 1) or not (score 0). The inflammation was recorded as bleeding scores if bleeding occurred within 30 seconds of probing. Bleeding on probing was estimated as a percentage.

    1 month

  • Bleeding on probing scores

    A periodontal probe runs along the marginal gingiva at an angle of approximately 60° to the longitudinal axis of the tooth to determine whether probing elicited marginal bleeding (score 1) or not (score 0). The inflammation was recorded as bleeding scores if bleeding occurred within 30 seconds of probing. Bleeding on probing was estimated as a percentage.

    2 months

  • Bleeding on probing scores

    A periodontal probe runs along the marginal gingiva at an angle of approximately 60° to the longitudinal axis of the tooth to determine whether probing elicited marginal bleeding (score 1) or not (score 0). The inflammation was recorded as bleeding scores if bleeding occurred within 30 seconds of probing. Bleeding on probing was estimated as a percentage.

    4 months

Study Arms (2)

Manual toothbrush

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients used manual orthodontic toothbrush (Oral B Ortho, Procter \& Gamble, USA) for four months

Device: Manual toothbrush

Genius toothbrush

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients used genius orthodontic toothbrush (Oral B Genius 8900, Procter \& Gamble, USA) for four months

Device: Genius toothbrush

Interventions

Patients brushed their teeth twice a day for 2 minutes. An integral timer was used in the genius toothbrush group.

Genius toothbrush

Patients brushed their teeth twice a day for 2 minutes. During brushing, patients in manual group assigned to use their brushes were provided with a digital timer.

Manual toothbrush

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Permanent dentition with no missing teeth
  • No systemic or severe periodontal problems
  • Indication of non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatment
  • No use of drugs in the past two months
  • Absence of physical problems that prevent brushing
  • Right handedness for brushing
  • Same bracket type (0.022 slot metal, conventional) and ligation technique (wire ligature)
  • Finishing of leveling phase (use of rectangular wires)
  • Initial total score was between 3 and 10 for the labial surface of each tooth according to the modified Silness and Löe plaque index

You may not qualify if:

  • Missing teeth
  • Systemic or severe periodontal problem
  • Indication of extraction treatment
  • Use of drugs in the past two months
  • Levelling phase of fixed orthodontic treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics

Denizli, 20160, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The examiner who performed clinical periodontal parameters was blinded to group assignment.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2020

First Posted

January 21, 2020

Study Start

October 28, 2018

Primary Completion

February 28, 2019

Study Completion

March 28, 2019

Last Updated

January 21, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations