Supraclavicular Bupivacaine Vs. Supraclavicular Liposomal Bupivacaine for Orthopedic Wrist Surgery
Vs
Randomized Controlled Trial of Supraclavicular Bupivacaine Vs. Supraclavicular Liposomal Bupivacaine for Orthopedic Wrist Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthopedic wrist procedures often cause significant postoperative pain. A supraclavicular nerve block is an effective and proven method to help reduce postoperative pain and decrease opioid use around the time of upper extremity surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) has been approved for use around the brachial plexus, but its analgesic efficacy has limited data. The investigators' goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of Exparel as compared to plain bupivacaine. The investigators hope to ensure the quality of pain control around the time of distal radius fracture repair and reduce the variability of care at the investigators institution by prospectively and rigorously collecting perioperative data during this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
October 24, 2025
October 1, 2025
2.5 years
December 11, 2023
October 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pre-operative and 48-hour Post-operative Quality of Recovery 15 survey score
The quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated questionnaire to assess postoperative recovery. Scale is based on 15 questions, each question score range is 0-10 (0 being poor and 10 being excellent) The survey will be conducted at 24 hours intervals after surgery up to 48 hours total after surgery. The total score range is 0-150, where a score of 0 would be the worst possible score, and 150 would be the best possible score
Pre-operative and at 24 hours and 48 hours post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Difference in Participant Reported Pain Scores
Post-operative period up to 48 hours after surgery
Time to First Dose of Opioid Medication
Post-operative period up to 48 hours after surgery
Total opioid dose through Post-op Day 2
Post-operative period up to 48 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Supraclavicular Liposomal Bupivacaine group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive the liposomal bupivacaine
Supraclavicular Plain Bupivacaine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive the plain bupivacaine
Interventions
133mg Liposomal bupivacaine plus 10mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
20mL 0.25% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to 18
- Scheduled for orthopedic wrist surgery at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia
- Emergent surgery Open fractures will be treated emergently and will not allow adequate lead time for enrollment in this study. Also, open fractures are usually accompanied by other traumatic injuries that would confound the pain related outcomes in this study.
- Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurological disorder affecting the upper extremity
- Pregnancy Pregnant women have physiologic changes that make them more sensitive to local anesthetics. That would introduce a confounding element in interpreting the effectiveness of the peripheral nerve blocks being studied.
- Cognitive or psychiatric condition that might affect patient assessment and/or inability to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Related Publications (9)
Abell DJ, Barrington MJ. Pneumothorax after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: presenting features, risk, and related training. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):164-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000045.
PMID: 24496168RESULTBrown CA, Ghanouni A, Williams R, Payne SH, Ghareeb PA. Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks in Open Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Perioperative Pain Management Protocol. Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 4):S332-S336. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003464. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
PMID: 36752544RESULTHussain N, Brull R, Sheehy B, Essandoh MK, Stahl DL, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. Perineural Liposomal Bupivacaine Is Not Superior to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine for Peripheral Nerve Block Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):147-164. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003651.
PMID: 33372953RESULTMyles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
PMID: 35430086RESULTRundgren J, Mellstrand Navarro C, Ponzer S, Regberg A, Serenius S, Enocson A. Regional or General Anesthesia in the Surgical Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1168-1176. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00984.
PMID: 31274718RESULTSchoenherr JW, Gonzalez M, Serrano R, Park M, Lee Z, Cobb K, Howard C, Flynn D, Li Q, Grant S, Bullard T. Quality of Recovery After Rotator Cuff Repair With Interscalene Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Interscalene Nerve Catheter. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Nov 22;10(11):23259671221134819. doi: 10.1177/23259671221134819. eCollection 2022 Nov.
PMID: 36458106RESULTChazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
PMID: 26787793RESULTD'Souza RS, Johnson RL. Supraclavicular Block. [Updated 2023 Jan 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519056/
RESULTMyles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
PMID: 27159009RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jay Schoenherr, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- As participants are enrolled in this study, a study identification will be created as their basic demographic information is entered into the secure RedCap database. At this time, the RedCap randomization tool will randomize the subject to either group 1 or 2.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2023
First Posted
December 21, 2023
Study Start
April 10, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share