Resettled Refugee Families for Healing
RRF4H
2 other identifiers
interventional
308
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial is to test a family strengthening (FS) model delivered through multiple family groups (MFG) combined with a virtual peer mentoring program called TeenAge Health Consultants (Virtual TAHC) aimed at addressing emotional and behavioral problems among youth born in the U.S. to parents resettled as refugees. The specific aims of the study are: Aim 1: To systematically adapt an evidence-based family strengthening (FS) model delivered through multiple family groups (MFG) combined with a peer mentoring program (Virtual TAHC) (Goal 1). Aim 2: To assess preliminary short- and long-term impact of the combination intervention (MFG + Virtual TAHC) on behavioral emotional disorders (aggressive behavior, antisocial behaviors, anxiety, depression, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder \[PTSD\]) related to intergenerational trauma among SGRC in the trial (Goal 2). Aim 3: Utilizing mixed methods and applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, examine implementation strategies, facilitators, and barriers of the RRF4H intervention (Goal 3). Participants will receive:
- 1.Family strengthening intervention delivered through multiple family groups (MFG) where children and one of their biological parents will participate in 16 weekly group sessions to discuss common problems and how to address them.
- 2.The youth in the intervention will participate in a peer mentorship program called TeenAge Health Consultants (TAHC) consisting of 16 weekly virtual sessions where they interact with other youth to learn about important topics including how to deal with conflict, stay out of trouble, deal with stress, avoid drugs and other topics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.2 years
November 1, 2023
April 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Improvement in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms among adolescents
Change in symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will be assessed using Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) for adolescents. PTSD scores will be dichotomized between meeting diagnostic criteria for PTSD (\>=35) and not meeting diagnostic criteria for PTSD (\<35).
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms among adults
Change in symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will be assessed using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ). PTSD score will be dichotomized between meeting diagnostic criteria for PTSD \>=2.0 and not meeting diagnostic criteria for PTSD \<2.0.
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Depression Symptoms among adults
Changes in depression symptoms will be measured using the Hopkins symptoms checklist 25. Depression score will be dichotomized between meeting diagnostic criteria for depression (\>=1.75) and not meeting diagnostic criteria for depression (\<1.75).
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Depression Symptoms among adolescents
Changes in depression symptoms will be measured using Hopkins symptoms checklist 37. There is no set clinical cut-off level, but higher score indicates symptoms severity.
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Anxiety Symptoms among adults
Changes in anxiety symptoms will be measured using Hopkins symptoms checklist 25. Anxiety score will be dichotomized between meeting diagnostic criteria for anxiety (\>=1.75) and not meeting diagnostic criteria or anxiety (\<1.75)
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Anxiety Symptoms among adolescents
Changes in depression symptoms will be measured using Hopkins symptoms checklist 37. There is no set clinical cut-off level, but higher score indicates symptoms severity.
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvements in Antisocial Behavior Symptoms (adolescents only)
Changes in antisocial behavior will be assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 6 to 18 years. T-scores will be dichotomized between abnormal range (T-score \>=69) and normal range (T-score \<69).
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Aggressive Behavior Symptoms (adolescents only)
Changes in aggressive behavior will be assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 6 to 18 years. T-scores will be dichotomized between abnormal range (T-score \>=69) and normal range (T-score \<69).
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Improvement in Family Cohesion
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Social Social Support
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Family and Social Support
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Family Communication
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Improvement in Family Functioning
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Intervention Feasibility
Baseline, 16 Weeks post-intervention, and 6 months
Intervention Acceptability
6 months post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
RRF4H Combination Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALThis is a combination intervention that builds on the Usual Care and will consist of (1) a MFG-based FS model, which targets issues such as communication, relationship, and social support network development to assist with parenting and stress management, and stigma reduction96 and (2) a peer-mentoring program called TeenAge Health Consultants (Virtual TAHC) adapted for delivery in virtual environment.
Usual Care Group
NO INTERVENTIONYouth in RRF4H study will receive the usual mental health counseling provided through their school counselors. There is no structured curriculum for the group counseling programs but are available to all students as needed. The Lincoln Public School District also provides additional resources on specific topics such as trauma, depression and anxiety in children and adolescents, and alcohol substance use in families and provide appropriate referrals for those in need. Additionally, through organizations such as the International Council for Refugees and Immigrants (ICRI), refugee youth 7 to 18 years of age can receive educational and social support programs, after-school STEM clubs and one-on-one peer mentoring. Through the New Life Family Alliance, in addition to after-school program, boys and girls basketball program, youth are connected to youth-serving agencies that can help them effectively and successfully develop and take advantage of opportunities available to them.
Interventions
MFG: is a family strengthening model where children and their parents sit together in groups of 8 to 10 families to discuss important issues. MFG approach provides a social support mechanism and strengthens family relationships by allowing families to share common experiences as well as effective strategies for addressing difficult issues; and focuses on reducing stigma and normalizing common experiences. TAHC: This is a peer-led program that allows younger students to talk with peers about important issues that they face, gain role models, and identify positive social norms from older peers. It provides age-appropriate lessons and is delivered in a structured fashion. The curriculum consists of sixteen 50-minute lessons spread out over two academic years. Topics delivered in the curriculum include substance use, positive outlook on life, forming a positive self-concept, decision making and problem solving, coping with depression, bullying and social media.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child born in the US
- Ages 14-17 years
- In the 9th - 12th grades
- Enrolled in one of the schools in Omaha and Lincoln, NE area Schools
- Peer mentors must be students in upper class (11th or 12th grade) and
- Willing and able to serve as good role models
- Peer mentors must be nominated by community leaders
- Parents must be someone resettled in the U.S. as refugee and be a biological parent of a child between the ages 14-17 years
- Parents must be ≥30 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Can understand the study procedures and/or participant rights during the informed consent process
- Unwilling or unable to commit to completing the study; 2)
- Present with emergency needs (e.g., hospitalization), needed care will be secured, rather than study participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nile Lutheran Church
Omaha, Nebraska, 68111, United States
Related Publications (71)
Bronstein I, Montgomery P. Psychological distress in refugee children: a systematic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011 Mar;14(1):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0081-0.
PMID: 21181268BACKGROUNDJany L. Growing opioid use in Somali community spurs need for culturally relevant treatment. StarTribune2021
BACKGROUNDMcCleary JS, Shannon PJ, Cook TL. Connecting Refugees to Substance Use Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Soc Work Public Health. 2016;31(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2015.1087906. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
PMID: 26667046BACKGROUNDGundel BE. Sudanese refugees' psychological need and mental health care: A phenomenological study of Sudanese beliefs about psychological treatment. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2016
BACKGROUNDTutlam NT. The Impact of Maternal War Trauma on Children: A Study of South Sudanese Families Resettled in the US, Saint Louis University; 2017
BACKGROUNDEnsor MO. South Sudanese diaspora children: Contested notions of childhood, uprootedness, and belonging among young refugees in the US. In: Contested childhoods: Growing up in migrancy. Springer, Cham; 2016:61-77.
BACKGROUNDKroll J, Yusuf AI, Fujiwara K. Psychoses, PTSD, and depression in Somali refugees in Minnesota. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;46(6):481-93. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0216-0. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
PMID: 20354676BACKGROUNDMinnesota State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup. Epidemiological Profile of Substance Use +Related Factors among Minnesota's Somali Youth. In: Minnesota Schools ea, ed. Saint Paul2017.
BACKGROUNDAbur W. Settlement strategies for the South Sudanese community in Melbourne: an analysis of employment and sport participation. Melbourne: Victoria University. 2018.
BACKGROUNDSowey H. Are refugees at increased risk of substance misuse. Sydney: Drug and Alcohol Multicultural Education Centre. 2005
BACKGROUNDSpencer JH, Le TN. Parent refugee status, immigration stressors, and Southeast Asian youth violence. J Immigr Minor Health. 2006 Oct;8(4):359-68. doi: 10.1007/s10903-006-9006-x.
PMID: 16841183BACKGROUNDBuchanan RL, Smokowski PR. Pathways from acculturation stress to substance use among latino adolescents. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(5):740-62. doi: 10.1080/10826080802544216.
PMID: 19308866BACKGROUNDReid CA, Lorraine Beyer, Nick Crofts, Gary. Ethnic communities' vulnerability to involvement with illicit drugs. Drugs: education, prevention and policy. 2001;8(4):359-374.
BACKGROUNDPoppitt G, Frey R. Sudanese adolescent refugees: Acculturation and acculturative stress. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. 2007;17(2):160-181.
BACKGROUNDMilner K, Khawaja NG. Sudanese refugees in Australia: The impact of acculturation stress. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 2010;4(1):19-29
BACKGROUNDFosados R, McClain A, Ritt-Olson A, Sussman S, Soto D, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Unger JB. The influence of acculturation on drug and alcohol use in a sample of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;32(12):2990-3004. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
PMID: 17618064BACKGROUNDPriest N, Paradies Y, Trenerry B, Truong M, Karlsen S, Kelly Y. A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;95:115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.031. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
PMID: 23312306BACKGROUNDKellermann NP. Epigenetic transmission of Holocaust trauma: can nightmares be inherited? Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2013;50(1):33-9.
PMID: 24029109BACKGROUNDvan IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Sagi-Schwartz A. Are children of Holocaust survivors less well-adapted? A meta-analytic investigation of secondary traumatization. J Trauma Stress. 2003 Oct;16(5):459-69. doi: 10.1023/A:1025706427300.
PMID: 14584630BACKGROUNDMotta R. Personal and intrafamilial effects of the Vietnam war experience. The Behavior Therapist. 1990;13:155-157.
BACKGROUNDRoth M, Neuner F, Elbert T. Transgenerational consequences of PTSD: risk factors for the mental health of children whose mothers have been exposed to the Rwandan genocide. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Apr 1;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-12.
PMID: 24690436BACKGROUNDBowers ME, Yehuda R. Intergenerational Transmission of Stress in Humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(1):232-44. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.247. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
PMID: 26279078BACKGROUNDIsobel S, Goodyear M, Furness T, Foster K. Preventing intergenerational trauma transmission: A critical interpretive synthesis. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Apr;28(7-8):1100-1113. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14735. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PMID: 30556334BACKGROUNDSangalang CC, Vang C. Intergenerational Trauma in Refugee Families: A Systematic Review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Jun;19(3):745-754. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0499-7.
PMID: 27659490BACKGROUNDSack WH, Clarke GN, Seeley J. Posttraumatic stress disorder across two generations of Cambodian refugees. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;34(9):1160-6. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199509000-00013.
PMID: 7559310BACKGROUNDDaud A, Skoglund E, Rydelius PA. Children in families of torture victims: Transgenerational transmission of parents' traumatic experiences to their children. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2005;14(1):23-32.
BACKGROUNDCaselli LT, Motta RW. The effect of PTSD and combat level on Vietnam veterans' perceptions of child behavior and marital adjustment. J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):4-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:13.0.co;2-e.
PMID: 7782473BACKGROUNDDekel R, Goldblatt H. Is there intergenerational transmission of trauma? The case of combat veterans' children. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2008 Jul;78(3):281-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013955.
PMID: 19123747BACKGROUNDRosenheck R, Nathan P. Secondary traumatization in children of Vietnam veterans. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 May;36(5):538-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.5.538. No abstract available.
PMID: 4007811BACKGROUNDRosenheck R, Thomson J. "Detoxification" of Vietnam War trauma: a combined family-individual approach. Fam Process. 1986 Dec;25(4):559-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00559.x.
PMID: 3817129BACKGROUNDRoberts AL, Galea S, Austin SB, Cerda M, Wright RJ, Rich-Edwards JW, Koenen KC. Posttraumatic stress disorder across two generations: concordance and mechanisms in a population-based sample. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 15;72(6):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
PMID: 22521146BACKGROUNDTutlam NT, Flick LH, Xian H, Matsuo H, Tutdeal N, Glowinski A. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Among US-Born Children of South Sudanese Parents Resettled as Refugees. Global Social Welfare. 2022:1-10.
BACKGROUNDTutlam NT, Flick LH, Xian H, Matsuo H, Glowinski A, Tutdeal N. Trauma-Associated Psychiatric Disorders Among South Sudanese Dinka and Nuer Women Resettled in the USA. Global Social Welfare. 2020;7(3):189-199.
BACKGROUNDTutlam NT, Liu Y, Nelson EJ, Flick LH, Chang JJ. The Effects of Race and Ethnicity on the Risk of Large-for-Gestational-Age Newborns in Women Without Gestational Diabetes by Prepregnancy Body Mass Index Categories. Matern Child Health J. 2017 Aug;21(8):1643-1654. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2256-x.
PMID: 28092059BACKGROUNDTutlam NT, Chang JJ, Byansi W, Flick LH, Ssewamala FM, Betancourt TS. War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders. Glob Soc Welf. 2024 Sep;11(3):193-210. doi: 10.1007/s40609-022-00227-w. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
PMID: 39588290BACKGROUNDSsewamala FM, Bermudez LG, Neilands TB, Mellins CA, McKay MM, Garfinkel I, Sensoy Bahar O, Nakigozi G, Mukasa M, Stark L, Damulira C, Nattabi J, Kivumbi A. Suubi4Her: a study protocol to examine the impact and cost associated with a combination intervention to prevent HIV risk behavior and improve mental health functioning among adolescent girls in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5604-5.
PMID: 29871619BACKGROUNDChacko A, Gopalan G, Franco L, Dean-Assael K, Jackson J, Marcus S, Hoagwood K, McKay M. Multiple Family Group Service Model for Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at Post-Treatment. J Emot Behav Disord. 2015 Jun;23(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1063426614532690.
PMID: 26316681BACKGROUNDGopalan G, Bornheimer LA, Acri MC, Winters A, O'Brien KH, Chacko A, McKay MM. Multiple family group service delivery model for children with disruptive behavior disorders: Impact on caregiver stress and depressive symptoms. J Emot Behav Disord. 2018 Sep;26(3):182-192. doi: 10.1177/1063426617717721. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
PMID: 30505141BACKGROUNDWeine S, Kulauzovic Y, Klebic A, Besic S, Mujagic A, Muzurovic J, Spahovic D, Sclove S, Pavkovic I, Feetham S, Rolland J. Evaluating a multiple-family group access intervention for refugees with PTSD. J Marital Fam Ther. 2008 Apr;34(2):149-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00061.x.
PMID: 18412823BACKGROUNDKeiley MK, Zaremba-Morgan A, Datubo-Brown C, Pyle R, Cox M. Multiple-Family Group Intervention for Incarcerated Male Adolescents Who Sexually Offend and Their Families: Change in Maladaptive Emotion Regulation Predicts Adaptive Change in Adolescent Behaviors. J Marital Fam Ther. 2015 Jul;41(3):324-39. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12078. Epub 2014 May 8.
PMID: 24809985BACKGROUNDClarahan W, Christenson JD. Family involvement in the treatment of adolescent substance abuse. In: Family therapy with adolescents in residential treatment. Springer; 2017:231-243
BACKGROUNDJackson JM. Multi-family groups for multi-stressed families: Initial outcomes and future implications. Research on Social Work Practice. 2015;25(5):537-548
BACKGROUNDCuijpers P. Peer-led and adult-led school drug prevention: a meta-analytic comparison. J Drug Educ. 2002;32(2):107-19. doi: 10.2190/LPN9-KBDC-HPVB-JPTM.
PMID: 12206061BACKGROUNDMatz AK. Commentary: Do youth mentoring programs work? A review of the empirical literature. Journal of juvenile justice. 2014;3(2):83.
BACKGROUNDTolan P, Henry D, Schoeny M, Bass A, Lovegrove P, Nichols E. Mentoring interventions to affect juvenile delinquency and associated problems: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2013;9(1):1-158.
BACKGROUNDMarsch LA, Borodovsky JT. Technology-based Interventions for Preventing and Treating Substance Use Among Youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Oct;25(4):755-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
PMID: 27613350BACKGROUNDFirst MB. QuickSCID-5: Quick Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2021.
BACKGROUNDOmaha Public Schools. Student and Community Services: School Counseling. 2021; https://www.ops.org/site/Default.aspx?PageID=557. Accessed October 15, 2021
BACKGROUNDLincoln Public Schools. Student Services: Social Workers. 2021; https://home.lps.org/socialworkers. Accessed October 15, 2021
BACKGROUNDInternational Council for Refugees and Immigrants. Youth Services. 2022; https://icrius.org/programs/youth-services/. Accessed October 15, 2022.
BACKGROUNDNew Life Family Alliance. Youth Programs. 2022; https://nlfaomaha.org/youth-programs. Accessed October 15, 2022
BACKGROUNDMcKay MM, Gonzales JJ, Stone S, Ryland D, Kohner K. Multiple family therapy groups: A responsive intervention model for inner city families. Social Work with Groups. 1995;18(4):41-56
BACKGROUNDMcKay MM, Gonzales J, Quintana E, Kim L, Abdul-Adil J. Multiple family groups: An alternative for reducing disruptive behavioral difficulties of urban children. Research on Social Work Practice. 1999;9(5):593-607.
BACKGROUNDWilhelm AK, McRee AL, Bonilla ZE, Eisenberg ME. Mental health in Somali youth in the United States: the role of protective factors in preventing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and self-injury. Ethn Health. 2021 May;26(4):530-553. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1514451. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
PMID: 30141350BACKGROUNDBetancourt TS, Berent JM, Freeman J, Frounfelker RL, Brennan RT, Abdi S, Maalim A, Abdi A, Mishra T, Gautam B, Creswell JW, Beardslee WR. Family-Based Mental Health Promotion for Somali Bantu and Bhutanese Refugees: Feasibility and Acceptability Trial. J Adolesc Health. 2020 Mar;66(3):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
PMID: 31699604BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDDiggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data: Oxford University Press.[Google Scholar]. 2002
BACKGROUNDManagement Information System for Individual Development Accounts: A Feasibility Study (CSD Report No. 01-21) [computer program]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development; 2001
BACKGROUNDMIS IDA Operations Manual: Management Information System for Individual Development Accounts, Version 5 [Computer Software Manual] [computer program]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development; 2006
BACKGROUNDLuellen JK, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Eval Rev. 2005 Dec;29(6):530-58. doi: 10.1177/0193841X05275596.
PMID: 16244051BACKGROUNDvan der Laan M, Rose S. Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
BACKGROUNDEnders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.
BACKGROUNDLittle RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
BACKGROUNDCollins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):330-51.
PMID: 11778676BACKGROUNDCro S, Morris TP, Kenward MG, Carpenter JR. Sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with missing continuous outcome data using controlled multiple imputation: A practical guide. Stat Med. 2020 Sep 20;39(21):2815-2842. doi: 10.1002/sim.8569. Epub 2020 May 17.
PMID: 32419182BACKGROUNDSAS Institute. BASE SAS 9.4 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2013.
BACKGROUNDWestfall PH, Young SS. Resmpling Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-value Adjustment. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1993
BACKGROUNDRodriguez G, Goldman N. An Assessment of Estimation Procedures for Multilevel Models with Binary Responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a-Statistics in Society. 1995;158:73-89.
BACKGROUNDHaybittle JL. Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment. Br J Radiol. 1971 Oct;44(526):793-7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-44-526-793. No abstract available.
PMID: 4940475BACKGROUNDPeto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br J Cancer. 1977 Jan;35(1):1-39. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1977.1.
PMID: 831755BACKGROUNDTutlam NT, Liyew TW, Betancourt TS, Powell BJ, Guo S, McKay M, Ssewamala FM. Type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial to address intergenerational impact of war trauma and resilience among second-generation refugee children in the USA: Resettled Refugee Families for Healing (RRF4H) study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 16;15(10):e108824. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108824.
PMID: 41101964DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nhial T Tutlam, PhD
Washington University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2023
First Posted
December 20, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
Once all of the data has been de-identified, cleaned, and validated, and main findings have been published, the principal investigator (PI) intends to share the data and I will ensure all mechanisms used to share data will include proper plans and safeguards for the protection of privacy, confidentiality, and security for data dissemination and reuse (e.g., all data will be thoroughly de-identified and will not be traceable to a specific study participant). Plans for archiving and long-term preservation of the data will be implemented, as appropriate.