Effectiveness and Safety of Pigment Solution Program (PSP) as Adjuvant Therapy in Melasma
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research is a clinical study with a single-blind randomized clinical trial design (randomized controlled trial) in multicenters at two Dermatology and Venereology Education centers in Indonesia. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of PSP as adjuvant therapy for melasma. This research will be attended by 33 research subjects
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedDecember 18, 2023
December 1, 2023
3 months
November 7, 2023
December 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change of Melasma Severity based on modified Melasma Severity Index (mMASI) score.
The range of values for mMASI is between 0 and 24 which can then be divided into mild melasma (0-8), moderate (8-16), and severe (16-24). The range of values for mMASI is between 0 and 24 which can then be divided into mild melasma (0-8), moderate (8-16), and severe (16-24). improvement occurs if the mMASI score decreases by \<50% from the previous visit worsening if score persists or mMASI Score Increase \>50%
re-evaluation on day 28, day 56 and day 84 of therapy
Change of Melasma Severity based on Investigator Global Assesment (IGA).
Assessment of response to therapy as follows: * No effect: 0 (no visible change in Pigmentation) * Mild: 1 (decreased visible pigmentation, but still visible boundaries) * Moderate: 2 (obvious decrease in Pigmentation, but still limited visible) * Very good: 3 (disappearance of all visible abnormalities Pigmentation) improvement if there is \>50% improvement from the previous visit worsening if score persists or improvement \<50%
re-evaluation on day 28, day 56 and day 84 of therapy
Change of Melasma Severity based on Investigator Tolerability Assesment (ITA).
is one method of evaluating patient tolerability of products which is assessed subjectively by investigators. Assessment of patient tolerability as follows: * 0 = no tolerability, * 1 = moderate tolerability, * 2 = good tolerability, * 3 = very good tolerability. tolerability was good if the score improved \>50% from the previous visit worsening if score persists or improvement \<50%
re-evaluation on day 84 of therapy
Change of Melasma Severity based on Patient's Tolerability Assesment (PtGA).
one method of evaluating the response to therapy in melasma which is assessed subjectively by the patient. The response to therapy can be assessed as follows * No or slight response: \< 25% improvement * Moderate response: 25% - 50% improvement * Good response: 50% improvement - \< 75% * Excellent response: improvement \> 75% The response is said to be good if the score is above 50% since the previous visit
re-evaluation on day 28, day 56 and day 84 of therapy
Change of Melanin and Erythema Index Based on Mexameter
improves if there is a decrease in melanin levels \> 50% from the initial visit It is said to be bad or persistent if there is no decrease in melanin levels or there is a decrease of \<50%
re-evaluation on day 28, day 56 and day 84 of therapy
Change of Melasma Severity based on Dermoscopy
based on Dermoscopy Telangiectasis score assessment using a 5-point dermoscopy-scale: 0 = No visible capillaries. 1 = Elongated capillaries accompanied by dilation, not visible to the naked eye. 2 = Moderate telangiectasis that is beginning to be visible to the naked eye. 3 = Severe telangiectasis characterized by reduced capillary loops. 4 = Very severe telangiectasis characterized by dilatation and loss of capillary loops.
re-evaluation on day 84 of therapy
Change of Melasma Severity based on Wood's Lamp
Epidermal Type/ Dermal Typed/ Mixed Typed
re-evaluation on day 84 of therapy
Compare Quality Of Life based on MelasQoL Score
based on MelasQoL Score minimum score: 7 maximum score : 70
re-evaluation on day 84 of therapy
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 (HQ group)
NO INTERVENTIONGroup 1 is control group, getting SPF 30 sunscreen cream in the morning and only 2% Hydroquinone cream at night without a combination cream and facial soap that can be used in the morning and evening.
Group 2 (PSP Group)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2, the treatment group, used PSP cleanser, PSP Day Cream and SPF 30 sunscreen in the morning and used Hydroquinone 2% and PSP Night Cream at night and PSP cleanser which was used in the morning and evening before using the cream.
Interventions
adjuvant therapy for melasma that contains of combination formula consisting of morning cream - containing kojic acid, Vitamin E, Vitamin A and AquaxylTM complex; night cream - contains kojic acid, glycolic acid and AquaxylTM complex, scrub granules; and cleaning fluid containing vegetable oil and lactic acid.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women aged 30-60 years
- Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV-V
- Diagnosis of epidermal, mixed and dermal types of Melasma
You may not qualify if:
- Are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Use other lightening agents, both oral and topical
- Allergy to PSP content
- Use of other topical therapies for skin disorders may interfere with the evaluation of melasma conditions
- Suffering from other skin diseases such as acne, dermatitis
- Using hormonal birth control
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dr.dr.Irma Bernadette, SpKK (K)lead
- Menarini Groupcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Prof. Dr. dr. Irma Bernadette S. Sitohang, SpKK(K) Sitohang
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. dr. Irma Bernadette S. Sitohang, SpKK(K)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2023
First Posted
December 18, 2023
Study Start
September 25, 2023
Primary Completion
December 18, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
December 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12